Notice of Postponement of Deposition; Motion to Quash Subpoenae or in the Alternative for a Protective Order

Public Court Documents
December 14, 1981 - December 17, 1981

Notice of Postponement of Deposition; Motion to Quash Subpoenae or in the Alternative for a Protective Order preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Letter to Everett from Carraway RE Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Interrogatories, 1999. d573623b-f60e-f011-9989-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/bc7e0eb8-b59d-46a6-8f72-493351039697/letter-to-everett-from-carraway-re-defendants-response-to-plaintiffs-interrogatories. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    State of North Carolina 
MICHAEL F. EASLEY Department of Justice 

ATTORNEY GENERAL P. O. BOX 629 REPLY TO: Frances S. Carraway. CLAS 

RALEIGH Special Litigation 

27602-0629 (919) 716-6900 
(919) 716-6763 

October 7, 1999 

Robinson O. Everett VIA HAND DELIVERY 

P O Box 586 

Durham, NC 27702 

Re: Cromartie: Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Interrogatories 

Dear Mr. Everett: 

Enclosed please find the declarations of Representative Edwin McMahan, Gerry Cohen and 

Linwood Jones verifying the responses found in Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ First Set of 

Interrogatories. We hope to have Senator Roy Cooper's declaration early next week and will forward 

it to you as soon as we receive it. 

Sincerely, 

wr 
Frances S. Carraway, CLAS 

Adam Stein 

Todd Cox 

 



  

DECLARATION 

Representative W. Edwin McMahan, Chairman of the House Congressional Redistricting 

Committee declares and says: 

That I have read the Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories and as 

committee chairman, I am acquainted, at least generally, with the facts contained therein as they 

relate to the House or me; that the response was prepared with the advice and assistance of counsel; 

and that the response separately and fully answers each interrogatory, except those to which 

objections are made. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the Defendants’ 

Response is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and befief. 

RLS 
  

Representative W. Edwin McMahan 

 



DECLARATION 

Gerry F. Cohen, staff counsel for the Senate Select Committee on Redistricting declares and 

That I have read the Defendants” Response to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories and as 

staff counsel for the committee, I am acquainted, at least generally, with the facts contained therein 

as they relate to the Senate or me; that the response was prepared with the advice and assistance of 

counsel; and that the response separately and fully answers each interrogatory, except those to which 

objections are made. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the Defendants’ 

] 
Response is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and beligf. 

/ 
| 

/ ~ = I! // 

Ll J / { 

Gerry F. Cohen 
  

 



  

DECLARATION 

Linwood L. Jones, staff counsel for the House Congressional Redistricting Committee 

declares and says: 

That I have read the Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories and as 

staff counsel for the committee, I am acquainted, at least generally, with the facts contained therein 

as they relate to the House or me; that the response was prepared with the advice and assistance of 

counsel; and that the response separately and fully answers each interrogatory, except those to which 

objections are made. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the Defendants’ 

Response is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. 

7 

/ ine da 

pr so 

  

  

  

Linwood L. Jones

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top