Order for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition with Motions

Public Court Documents
August 7, 1972

Cite this item

Order for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition with Motions preview

4 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
Matter
- Milliken v. Bradley
Case
- Milliken v. Bradley
U.S. state
- Michigan
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 620e406f-53e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0

Cite this item

Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Order for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition with Motions, 1972. 620e406f-53e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f71fe79f-e855-427f-a5ff-063ced96e3c8/order-for-writ-of-mandamus-and-prohibition-with-motions. Accessed November 28, 2025.

Copied!

    O F F IC E  O F  T H E  C L E R K

JAM E S  A. H IG G IN S United  s ta te s  c o u r t  of  a p p e a l s
FO R  T H E  S IX T H  C I R C U I T

CLERK
C IN C IN N A T I ,  O H IO  4-5202

August 7, 1972

Mr. Charles E. Keller 
Mr. Frank J. Kelley 
Mr. Robert A. Derengoski 
Mr. Eugene Krasicky 
Mr. David Norman 
Mr. Ralph B. Guy, Jr.
Mr. Louis R. Lucas 
Mr. J. Harold Flannery 

•'Mr. Jack Greenberg 
Mr. Nathaniel R. Jones 
Mr. E. Winther McCroom 
Mr. Bruce Miller 
Mr. Alexander B. Ritchie 
Mr. George T. Roumell, Jr. 
Mr. Theodore Sachs 
Mr. Kenneth B._ Me Connell 
Mr. Richard P. Condit 
Mr. William M. Saxton 
Mr. Douglas H. West 
Mr. Robert J. Lord 
Mr. Charles F. Clippert

Re : Case No /2 -1771
School District of the City of
Birmingham
vs .
The Honorable Stephen J. Roth 
AND '
Case No. 72-8002 
Bradley, et al. 
vs. _
William G. Milliken, et al. .
and ‘
Detroit .Federation of Teachers, etc. 
and
Denise Magdowski, et al.

Gentlemen: '
Enclosed.is a copy of two orders which were 

entered today in-the above-styled cases.
Very truly yours

Enclosures



NO. 72-1771
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF ;
BIRMINGHAM, OAKLAND COUNTY,
MICHIGAN ' :

F I L E D
A-UG 7 - 1972 

JAMES A. HIGGINS, Cle
petitioner

' O R D E R
THE HONORABLE STEPHEN J. ROTH, 
DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE EASTERN 
DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN 
DIVISION

Respondent

Before: PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and PECK,
Circuit Judges.

Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED that the application 
for writ of mandamus and prohibition is denied and the petition is 
dismissed.

This order is entered without prejudice to the right of 
the petitioner School District to file application to intervene 
in the case of Bradley v. Milliken now pending in the Eastern 
District of Michigan. .

' ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT



NO. 72-3002
UNITED STATES COURT OE APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
RONALD BRADLEY, ET AL.

Plaintiffs-Appellees
v.

WILLIAM G. MILLIKEN, ET AL.

a w n a

AU G? 1372

JAMES A. HIGGINS, Clerk

Defendants-AppeHants
and : O R D E R
DETROIT FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, :
LOCAL 231, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF 
TEACHERS, AFL-CIO :

Defendant-Intervenor
and
DENISE MAGDOWSKI, ET AL.

Defendants-Intervenors

Before: PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and PECK,
Circuit Judges.

This matter having come on to be considered on the 
Emergency Motions filed August 2, 1972, by the defendants-appellants 
Milliken, Kelley, State Board of Education, Porter and Green, and 
by defendants-intervenors Allen Park Public Schools, Grosse Poj.nte 
Public Schools, Southfield Public Schools and the School District of 
the City of Royal Oak for an order enforcing our order of July 20, •
1S72, and for an order directing the District Court to stay proceedings 
therein, and this Court, being fully advised in the premises having- 
determined that said motions are not well taken,



- 2-

d  0  XIX 0  Ci p

to  s 0©k

IT IS ORDERED that said motions be and they hereby are 
without, however, prejudice to the rights of the moving parties 
the same or similar relief in the District Court.

ENTERED BY ORDER CE THE COURT

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Order for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibition with Motions

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in