Correspondence from Menefee to Kellogg (Redacted)
Correspondence
February 8, 1988
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Correspondence from Menefee to Kellogg (Redacted), 1988. 521cf245-066a-ef11-bfe2-6045bdda2af8. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f74e1b2d-9596-45cd-8f46-6a0b2a43e9a8/correspondence-from-menefee-to-kellogg-redacted. Accessed November 05, 2025.
Copied!
LARRY T. MENEFEE
ATTORNEY AT LAW
FIFTH FLOOR TITLE BUILDING
300 NORTH TWENTY-FIRST STREET
BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35203
(205) 322-7300
February 8, 1988
Mr. R. James Kellogg
RE: Major vs. Treen
Dear Jim:
This in response to your letter of February 1. As you know,
I feel very badly about the course of this litigation.
In spite of considerable concern about our delay in filing a
supplemental brief on Delaware Valley I do not believe that even
a timely filing of that brief would have materially changed the
pace of which the court is moving. In my cover letter to that
draft brief which I sent out in September I believe that I raised
questions about future strategy and supplemental motions for
fees. Several of you wrote back saying that you had no
additional fees you wish to claim. (I have not heard from L.D.F
as to either future strategy or supplemental fees)
It is my suggestion that I do the following. Within the
next several days I will finish the supplemental brief (which I
received from Steve Ralston several weeks ago) and, with the
coordination of Bill Quigiey, get that filed. I will contact
Judge Collins office to learn what I can of the status of this
matter. I also would communicate with the Judge either by letter
or supplemental motion/brief informing him of Plaintiffs
inability to recover the interim fees he thought he ordered last
January, urging further attention to this matter and informing
him about our interest in the upcoming legislative session. I
will also file a supplemental motion for fees and expenses within
the next several weeks. Anyone who wishes to be included in that
should let me know immediately.
I would of course be glad to participate in a conference
call. Basically my suggestion is to make yet another effort to
prompt the court to action. Should we request a hearing or
do this? 1 would like to try this approach for the next several
months.
I have no contact with the State. It is difficult for we tO
assess the possibilities of settlement. I fear that we would
deal from such a position of weakness it would be quite
unfavorable. However, perhaps some of you could make a better
approach than I could to the State to see if there is any
interest in a settlement that we would find worth considering.
Thank you for your thoughts. Does anyone else have any
jdeas? Best regards.
Sincerely,
arry JT. Menefee
LTM:mp]
Lani Guinier
Armand Defner
Stanley Halpin
Bill Quigley
Steve Scheckman