Rogers v Lodge Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae
Public Court Documents
December 1, 1981
5 pages
Cite this item
-
Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Rogers v Lodge Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae, 1981. b59aea30-c39a-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f76d3687-83a8-4e82-a52a-8f6e62b4ea7a/rogers-v-lodge-motion-for-leave-to-file-brief-amicus-curiae. Accessed October 24, 2025.
Copied!
No. 80-2100
I n th e
(Emtrt of tty Mnit^
O ctober T erm , 1981
Q u en tin R ogers, et al.,
Appellants,
versus
H erman L odge, et al.
ON A P PE A R FROM T H E U N IT E D STATES
COURT OF A PPEALS FOR T H E F IF T H C IR C U IT
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF
AMICI CURIAE OF
THE N.A.A.C.P. LEGAL DEFENSE
AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.
AND THE CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS
IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES
J ack G reenberg
J ames M. N abrit, III
L ow ell J ohnston
N apoleon B. W illiam s
L an i G u in ie r
Suite 2030
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019
Counsel for Amici
December 1981
No. 80-2100
IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
OCTOBER TERM, 1981
QUENTIN ROGERS, et al.,
Appellants ,
versus
HERMAN LODGE, et al.
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF THE N.A.A.C.P. LEGAL DEFENSE
AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., AND THE
CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS IN SUPPORT
OF APPELLEES.
Pursuant
Legal Defense
to Rule 36, the N.A.A.C.P.
and Educational Fund, Inc.,
and the Congressional Black Caucus request
2
leave to file a Brief Amici Curiae in the
instant appeal. Amici are organizations
dedicated to protection of the right to
vote of minorities, especially Black Ameri
cans, in this country.
Appellees have consented to the re
quest. Appellants have not.
Amici assert in their brief that this
Court should decide in this appeal no more
than that Appellees have submitted suffi
cient evidence to sustain their burden of
proof and persuasion. Amici also argue
that the decision herein should be based
on evidentiary principles universally ap
plied in the federal courts. These argu
ments, as developed in the Brief Amici
Curiae, have not been presented by the
parties. Yet, they are critical for
proper disposition of this appeal. For
3
these reasons, Amici Curiae request leave
to file the brief.
Respectfully submitted,
JACK GREENBERG
JAMES M. NABRIT, III
LOWELL JOHNSTON
NAPOLEON B. WILLIAMS, JR.
LANI GUINIER
Suite 2030
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019
(212) 586-8397
Counsel for Amici In Support
of Appellants
MESLEN PRESS INC. — N. V. C. .<23>- 2)9