Letter to Markham from Smiley RE: Pretrial Order
Correspondence
October 22, 1999
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Letter to Markham from Smiley RE: Pretrial Order, 1999. c0dba293-f50e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f8d86b08-0aec-43b7-bcb0-585e0273561d/letter-to-markham-from-smiley-re-pretrial-order. Accessed November 19, 2025.
Copied!
State of North Carolina
MICHAEL F. EASLEY Department of Justice
ATTORNEY GENERAL P. 0. BOX 629 REPLY TO: Tiare B. Smiley
RALEIGH Special Litigation
27602-0629 (919) 716-6900
FAX: (919) 716-6763
October 22, 1999
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
Mr. Douglas Markham
Mr. Robinson O. Everett
Everett & Everett
Post Office Box 586
Durham, NC 27702
RE: Cromartie Pretrial Order
Dear Doug and Robinson:
Attached is our rough list of exhibits for the pretrial order. With your list in hand and the
delay of trial, we likely will be doing some revisions. We have already deleted deposition
exhibits that duplicate your designation of deposition exhibits. Our witness list has not changed,
except of course that we are adding Leslie Winner. With respect to various maps that we have
listed, the reference to “Data” is to the five basic statistical reports: deviation, total population,
VAP, registration, and elections.
We note that your lists are not formatted in a pretrial order format and do not contain a
column for objections. It would be helpful if your next version of the various lists is in the proper
format. With the delay of trial, we do not anticipate maintaining Monday’s deadline for
requesting copies of exhibits that are new or unknown to the other parties; nor do we see the need
to have the pretrial order ready by Friday. We do agree, however, that it is important to continue
to move forward in the preparation of the pretrial order and would like to come to agreement on a
revised schedule. :
Sincerely,
ice BMA
Tiare B. Smiley
Special Deputy Attorney General
cc: Adam Stein
Aodd Cox
HL. EXHIBITS
A. Deposition Exhibits
42. Shaw, et al. and Pope, et al. v. Hunt, et al. and Gingles, et al., Plaintiffs’ and
Plaintiff-Intervenors’ Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint Pursuant
to Rule 15(a), Fed. R. Civ. P. and Local Rule 4.00, 7/9/96
43. Shaw, et al. and Pope, et al. v. Hunt, et al. and Gingles, et al., Second Amended
Complaint for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction
44. Shaw, et al. and Pope, et al. v. Hunt, et al. and Gingles, et al., Response to Order
of June 9, 1997, 6/19/97
63. note to Robinson O. Everett, 11/29/95
B. Maps and Stipulated Data
No. Title
100. 1997 Section 5 Submission
101. 96 Congress Martin 2.0
a. Data
102. 97 Congress Cooper 2.0
a. District 1
b. District 12
Cc. Data
103. 97 Congress Cooper 3.0
a. District 1
b. District 12
C.' Data
104. 97 House/Senate Plan A
a. District ]
b.:* District 12
c.. Data
105. House 97 Congressional Plan A
a. District 1
b. District 12
C. + Datla
106. House 97 Congressional Plan A.1
a. District 1
b. District 12
c. Data
107. House 97 Congressional Plan B.1
a. District 1
b. District 12
c. Data
108. House 97 Congressional Plan E
a. District 1
b. District 12
Cc. Data
109. Comparative Maps of Districts 1 (1992 and 1997)
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
113,
116.
117.
118.
119,
120.
121.
122.
123.
Comparative Maps of Districts 12 (1992 and 1997)
Congressional District 1 - 1992 versus 1997
Congressional District 12 - 1992 versus 1997
North Carolina Counties by Percent Population Black
with First Congressional District Overlay
Republican Victories in Forsyth County Precincts Abutting District 12
Republican Victories in Guilford County Precincts Abutting District 12
Republican Victories in Mecklenburg County Precincts Abutting District 12
Forsyth County District 12 Precincts
Guilford County District 12 Precincts
Mecklenburg County District 12 Precincts
Precinct Map (Forsyth County)
Guilford County Precinct Map
Mecklenburg County Precinct Map
Guilford County Precincts “Excluded” By Elm and Lee Streets
Plaintiffs’ Exhibits
Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors
300.
309.
310.
311.
312.
313,
314.
313.
316.
317.
318.
28 CFR §51 (1999) Appendix - to Part 51 - Jurisdictions Covered Under Section
4(b) of the Voting Rights Act, as Amended
Affidavit of Dr. Gerald R. Webster and attached report, AN EVALUATION OF
NORTH CAROLINA’S 1998 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS,
Webster Tables 1 through 8
Webster Figures 1 through 12
Webster Figures A-1 through A-12
Webster Figures A-13 through A-18
ADDENDUM TO “AN EVALUATION OF NORTH CAROLINA’S 1998 CONGRESSIONAL
DISTRICTS [1997 PLAN],” Gerald R. Webster, Ph.D.
Webster Addendum Figures Al through AS
Chart: Segments Bordering the 12th District, Dr. David W. Peterson
a. Total Black Population
b. All Measures of Black Population
c. Court of Appeals Democrats
d. All Measures of Political Afiliation
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Photograph of computer screen
Judgment In A Civil Case, filed 9/15/97,
Shaw v. Hunt, No. 92-202-CIV-5-BR
Order, filed 7/12/96, Shaw v. Hunt,
No. 92-202-CIV-5-BR
U
L
Ww
)
LY
L
U
NO
NO
N
N
N
=
U
I
DD
re
D
N
D
w
h
(U
S)
No
or