Letter to Markham from Smiley RE: Pretrial Order
Correspondence
October 22, 1999

4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Letter to Markham from Smiley RE: Pretrial Order, 1999. c0dba293-f50e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f8d86b08-0aec-43b7-bcb0-585e0273561d/letter-to-markham-from-smiley-re-pretrial-order. Accessed June 14, 2025.
Copied!
State of North Carolina MICHAEL F. EASLEY Department of Justice ATTORNEY GENERAL P. 0. BOX 629 REPLY TO: Tiare B. Smiley RALEIGH Special Litigation 27602-0629 (919) 716-6900 FAX: (919) 716-6763 October 22, 1999 VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL Mr. Douglas Markham Mr. Robinson O. Everett Everett & Everett Post Office Box 586 Durham, NC 27702 RE: Cromartie Pretrial Order Dear Doug and Robinson: Attached is our rough list of exhibits for the pretrial order. With your list in hand and the delay of trial, we likely will be doing some revisions. We have already deleted deposition exhibits that duplicate your designation of deposition exhibits. Our witness list has not changed, except of course that we are adding Leslie Winner. With respect to various maps that we have listed, the reference to “Data” is to the five basic statistical reports: deviation, total population, VAP, registration, and elections. We note that your lists are not formatted in a pretrial order format and do not contain a column for objections. It would be helpful if your next version of the various lists is in the proper format. With the delay of trial, we do not anticipate maintaining Monday’s deadline for requesting copies of exhibits that are new or unknown to the other parties; nor do we see the need to have the pretrial order ready by Friday. We do agree, however, that it is important to continue to move forward in the preparation of the pretrial order and would like to come to agreement on a revised schedule. : Sincerely, ice BMA Tiare B. Smiley Special Deputy Attorney General cc: Adam Stein Aodd Cox HL. EXHIBITS A. Deposition Exhibits 42. Shaw, et al. and Pope, et al. v. Hunt, et al. and Gingles, et al., Plaintiffs’ and Plaintiff-Intervenors’ Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 15(a), Fed. R. Civ. P. and Local Rule 4.00, 7/9/96 43. Shaw, et al. and Pope, et al. v. Hunt, et al. and Gingles, et al., Second Amended Complaint for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction 44. Shaw, et al. and Pope, et al. v. Hunt, et al. and Gingles, et al., Response to Order of June 9, 1997, 6/19/97 63. note to Robinson O. Everett, 11/29/95 B. Maps and Stipulated Data No. Title 100. 1997 Section 5 Submission 101. 96 Congress Martin 2.0 a. Data 102. 97 Congress Cooper 2.0 a. District 1 b. District 12 Cc. Data 103. 97 Congress Cooper 3.0 a. District 1 b. District 12 C.' Data 104. 97 House/Senate Plan A a. District ] b.:* District 12 c.. Data 105. House 97 Congressional Plan A a. District 1 b. District 12 C. + Datla 106. House 97 Congressional Plan A.1 a. District 1 b. District 12 c. Data 107. House 97 Congressional Plan B.1 a. District 1 b. District 12 c. Data 108. House 97 Congressional Plan E a. District 1 b. District 12 Cc. Data 109. Comparative Maps of Districts 1 (1992 and 1997) 110. 111. 112. 113. 114. 113, 116. 117. 118. 119, 120. 121. 122. 123. Comparative Maps of Districts 12 (1992 and 1997) Congressional District 1 - 1992 versus 1997 Congressional District 12 - 1992 versus 1997 North Carolina Counties by Percent Population Black with First Congressional District Overlay Republican Victories in Forsyth County Precincts Abutting District 12 Republican Victories in Guilford County Precincts Abutting District 12 Republican Victories in Mecklenburg County Precincts Abutting District 12 Forsyth County District 12 Precincts Guilford County District 12 Precincts Mecklenburg County District 12 Precincts Precinct Map (Forsyth County) Guilford County Precinct Map Mecklenburg County Precinct Map Guilford County Precincts “Excluded” By Elm and Lee Streets Plaintiffs’ Exhibits Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors 300. 309. 310. 311. 312. 313, 314. 313. 316. 317. 318. 28 CFR §51 (1999) Appendix - to Part 51 - Jurisdictions Covered Under Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act, as Amended Affidavit of Dr. Gerald R. Webster and attached report, AN EVALUATION OF NORTH CAROLINA’S 1998 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS, Webster Tables 1 through 8 Webster Figures 1 through 12 Webster Figures A-1 through A-12 Webster Figures A-13 through A-18 ADDENDUM TO “AN EVALUATION OF NORTH CAROLINA’S 1998 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS [1997 PLAN],” Gerald R. Webster, Ph.D. Webster Addendum Figures Al through AS Chart: Segments Bordering the 12th District, Dr. David W. Peterson a. Total Black Population b. All Measures of Black Population c. Court of Appeals Democrats d. All Measures of Political Afiliation Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Photograph of computer screen Judgment In A Civil Case, filed 9/15/97, Shaw v. Hunt, No. 92-202-CIV-5-BR Order, filed 7/12/96, Shaw v. Hunt, No. 92-202-CIV-5-BR U L Ww ) LY L U NO NO N N N = U I DD re D N D w h (U S) No or