Letter to Markham from Smiley RE: Pretrial Order

Correspondence
October 22, 1999

Letter to Markham from Smiley RE: Pretrial Order preview

4 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Letter to Markham from Smiley RE: Pretrial Order, 1999. c0dba293-f50e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f8d86b08-0aec-43b7-bcb0-585e0273561d/letter-to-markham-from-smiley-re-pretrial-order. Accessed June 14, 2025.

    Copied!

    State of North Carolina 
MICHAEL F. EASLEY Department of Justice 

ATTORNEY GENERAL P. 0. BOX 629 REPLY TO: Tiare B. Smiley 
RALEIGH Special Litigation 

27602-0629 (919) 716-6900 
FAX: (919) 716-6763 

October 22, 1999 

VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL 

Mr. Douglas Markham 

Mr. Robinson O. Everett 

Everett & Everett 

Post Office Box 586 

Durham, NC 27702 

RE: Cromartie Pretrial Order 

Dear Doug and Robinson: 

Attached is our rough list of exhibits for the pretrial order. With your list in hand and the 
delay of trial, we likely will be doing some revisions. We have already deleted deposition 
exhibits that duplicate your designation of deposition exhibits. Our witness list has not changed, 
except of course that we are adding Leslie Winner. With respect to various maps that we have 
listed, the reference to “Data” is to the five basic statistical reports: deviation, total population, 
VAP, registration, and elections. 

We note that your lists are not formatted in a pretrial order format and do not contain a 
column for objections. It would be helpful if your next version of the various lists is in the proper 
format. With the delay of trial, we do not anticipate maintaining Monday’s deadline for 
requesting copies of exhibits that are new or unknown to the other parties; nor do we see the need 
to have the pretrial order ready by Friday. We do agree, however, that it is important to continue 
to move forward in the preparation of the pretrial order and would like to come to agreement on a 
revised schedule. : 

Sincerely, 

ice BMA 
Tiare B. Smiley 

Special Deputy Attorney General 
cc: Adam Stein 

Aodd Cox 

 



  

HL. EXHIBITS 

A. Deposition Exhibits 

42. Shaw, et al. and Pope, et al. v. Hunt, et al. and Gingles, et al., Plaintiffs’ and 

Plaintiff-Intervenors’ Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint Pursuant 

to Rule 15(a), Fed. R. Civ. P. and Local Rule 4.00, 7/9/96 

43. Shaw, et al. and Pope, et al. v. Hunt, et al. and Gingles, et al., Second Amended 

Complaint for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction 

44. Shaw, et al. and Pope, et al. v. Hunt, et al. and Gingles, et al., Response to Order 

of June 9, 1997, 6/19/97 

63. note to Robinson O. Everett, 11/29/95 

B. Maps and Stipulated Data 

No. Title 
100. 1997 Section 5 Submission 

101. 96 Congress Martin 2.0 

a. Data 

102. 97 Congress Cooper 2.0 

a. District 1 

b. District 12 

Cc. Data 

103. 97 Congress Cooper 3.0 

a. District 1 

b. District 12 

C.' Data 

104. 97 House/Senate Plan A 

a. District ] 

b.:* District 12 

c.. Data 

105. House 97 Congressional Plan A 

a. District 1 

b. District 12 

C. + Datla 

106. House 97 Congressional Plan A.1 

a. District 1 

b. District 12 

c. Data 

107. House 97 Congressional Plan B.1 

a. District 1 

b. District 12 

c. Data 

108. House 97 Congressional Plan E 

a. District 1 

b. District 12 

Cc. Data 

109. Comparative Maps of Districts 1 (1992 and 1997) 

 



  

110. 

111. 

112. 

113. 

114. 

113, 

116. 

117. 

118. 

119, 

120. 

121. 

122. 

123. 

Comparative Maps of Districts 12 (1992 and 1997) 
Congressional District 1 - 1992 versus 1997 

Congressional District 12 - 1992 versus 1997 

North Carolina Counties by Percent Population Black 

with First Congressional District Overlay 

Republican Victories in Forsyth County Precincts Abutting District 12 

Republican Victories in Guilford County Precincts Abutting District 12 

Republican Victories in Mecklenburg County Precincts Abutting District 12 

Forsyth County District 12 Precincts 

Guilford County District 12 Precincts 

Mecklenburg County District 12 Precincts 

Precinct Map (Forsyth County) 

Guilford County Precinct Map 

Mecklenburg County Precinct Map 

Guilford County Precincts “Excluded” By Elm and Lee Streets 

Plaintiffs’ Exhibits 

Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors 

300. 

309. 

310. 

311. 

312. 

313, 

314. 

313. 

316. 

317. 

318. 

28 CFR §51 (1999) Appendix - to Part 51 - Jurisdictions Covered Under Section 

4(b) of the Voting Rights Act, as Amended 

Affidavit of Dr. Gerald R. Webster and attached report, AN EVALUATION OF 

NORTH CAROLINA’S 1998 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS, 

Webster Tables 1 through 8 

Webster Figures 1 through 12 

Webster Figures A-1 through A-12 

Webster Figures A-13 through A-18 

ADDENDUM TO “AN EVALUATION OF NORTH CAROLINA’S 1998 CONGRESSIONAL 

DISTRICTS [1997 PLAN],” Gerald R. Webster, Ph.D. 

Webster Addendum Figures Al through AS 

Chart: Segments Bordering the 12th District, Dr. David W. Peterson 

a. Total Black Population 

b. All Measures of Black Population 

c. Court of Appeals Democrats 

d. All Measures of Political Afiliation 

Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

 



Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

Photograph of computer screen 

Judgment In A Civil Case, filed 9/15/97, 

Shaw v. Hunt, No. 92-202-CIV-5-BR 

Order, filed 7/12/96, Shaw v. Hunt, 

No. 92-202-CIV-5-BR 

  

U
L
 

Ww
) 

LY
 
L
U
 

NO
 

NO
 
N
N
N
 

=
 

U
I
 

DD
 

re
 
D
N
D
 

w
h
 

(U
S)
 

No
 

or

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top