Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Fourth Request for Production of Documents
Public Court Documents
April 24, 1991
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Fourth Request for Production of Documents, 1991. 60042677-a446-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f9df265f-e69c-4d0c-8163-8fd1d2e18cc6/defendants-motion-for-extension-of-time-to-respond-to-plaintiffs-fourth-request-for-production-of-documents. Accessed November 02, 2025.
Copied!
Cv 89-0360977S
MILO SHEFF, et al SUPERIOR COURT
J.D. HARTFORD/NEW
Plaintiffs NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD
Ve
WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al
Defendants APRIL 24, 1991
DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' FOURTH REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
OF DOCUMENTS
On March 27, 1991 defendants received plaintiffs' Fourth
Request for Production of documents. In the request plaintiff's
list thirty-two (32) categories of documents which they are
seeking. The defendants are in the process of identifying,
collecting, and copying the responsive material. Because of the
number of requests for production and the amount of work
necessary to identify and collect responsive material, the
defendants are unable to respond to plaintiffs' request within
the time provided by the Practice Book.
Auth: P.B. § 228(Db)
NO ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED/NO TESTIMONY REQUIRED
The purpose of this motion is to seek a one month extension
of time to respond to plaintiff's fourth request for production
of documents, giving the defendants until May 28, 1991. This is
the defendants first request for an extension of time to respond
to this set of interrogatories.
On April 23, 1991 defendants' counsel spoke with plaintiffs’
counsel (Attorney Stone) and was advised that the plaintiffs do
not object to the granting of this motion.
WHEREFORE, the defendants request that the time allotted for
them to respond to the Plaintiffs' Fourth Request for Production
be extended until May 28, 1991.
FOR THE DEFENDANTS
Fj n R. Whelan
Lg Lie a Attorney General
110 Sherman Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06105
Tel phone: 566-3
Wegyp | (V Lh Li
Diane W. Whitney
Assistant Attorney Gene &
110 Sherman Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06105
i
ORDER
For good cause shown the foregoing motion is hereby:
GRANTED/DENIED
BY THE COURT
HON. HARRY HAMMER
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed,
postage prepaid on April 24, 1991 to the following counsel or
record:
John Brittain
University of Connecticut
School of Law
65 Elizabeth Street
Hartford, CT 06105
Wilfred Rodriguez
Hispanic Advocacy Project
Neighborhood Legal Services
1229 Albany Avenue
Hartford, CT 06112
Philip Tegeler
Martha Stone
Connecticut Civil Liberties Union
32 Grand Street
Hartford, CT 06106
Wesley W. Horton
Mollier, Horton & Fineberg, P.C.
90 Gillett Street
Hartford, CT 06105
Jenny Rivera, Esq.
Puerto Rican Legal Defense Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street
14th Floor
New York, NY 10013
Julius L. Chambers
Marianne Lado, Esq.
Ronald Ellis, Esq.
NAACP Legal Defense Fund and
Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10013
John A. Powell
Helen Hershkoff
American Civil Liberties Union
132 West 43rd Street
New York, NY 10036
AA
John R. Whelan
Agsiscant Attorney General