Order Denying Motion for Stay
Public Court Documents
January 16, 1987

3 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Order Denying Motion for Stay, 1987. b3fcc6c0-b7d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/fa3b7117-3bcb-44f6-b8e0-b9e485b1138b/order-denying-motion-for-stay. Accessed April 27, 2025.
Copied!
OFFICE OF THE CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA . ER 4850 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE WilLAN rid J SAN FRANCISCO, CA. 94102 (415) 556-3031 TO: Counsel cof Record RE: Joseph Toussaint, et al v. Daniel McCarthy, et al; C 73-1422 SAW : A motion has been filed in this action noticed for hearing on Thursday, April 2,.1987 rat. 2:15 pm. Pursuant to Local Rule 220-3, opposition must be served and filed not later than March 19, 1987 , and reply to the opposition must be served and filed not later than March 26,1987 . THE COURT MAY IMPOSE SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO FULLY COMPLY WITH ALL RELEVANT RULES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE ONE ABOVE REFERENCED. oh Continuances of extensions of time will not be granted except in accordance with Local Rule 220-9. Max Thomsen, Courtroom Deputy Clerk for Judge Stanley A. Weigel UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT a NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4. Joseph Toussaint, et al Plaintiff, No. C. 73-1422 SAW vs. Daniel J. McCarthy, et al NOTICE Defendant. TO: COUNSEL OF RECORD YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT the above entitled case has been continued by the Court from March 26 to Thursday, April 2, 1987 at 2:15 pm for hearing Plaintiff's motion for civil contempt re double celling at Folsom San Francisco, California William L. Whittaker, Clerk Dated: February 27, 1987 Tr Max Thomsen, Deputy ELT CP CR th ME Fil.ED IN TRE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE JAN 1 6 10R7 MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ; : THOMAS C. CAVER, CLER" BY ies PEPUTY CLERK JOHN DILLARD, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) Vv. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 85-T-1332-N CRENSHAW COUNTY, etc., et al., ) Defendants. ; ORDER Counsel for the Lawrence County Defendants having orally informed the court that the parties have resolved the issues raised by the Lawrence County defendants' December 16, 1986, motion for stay pending appeal, it is ORDERED that said motion is denied. DONE, this the 16th day of January, 1987. Pima) DNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDCE —