Order Denying Motion for Stay
Public Court Documents
January 16, 1987
3 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Order Denying Motion for Stay, 1987. b3fcc6c0-b7d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/fa3b7117-3bcb-44f6-b8e0-b9e485b1138b/order-denying-motion-for-stay. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
. ER 4850 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE
WilLAN rid J
SAN FRANCISCO, CA. 94102
(415) 556-3031
TO: Counsel cof Record
RE: Joseph Toussaint, et al v. Daniel McCarthy, et al;
C 73-1422 SAW :
A motion has been filed in this action noticed for hearing
on Thursday, April 2,.1987 rat. 2:15 pm. Pursuant
to Local Rule 220-3, opposition must be served and filed not later
than March 19, 1987 , and reply to the opposition
must be served and filed not later than March 26,1987 .
THE COURT MAY IMPOSE SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO FULLY COMPLY
WITH ALL RELEVANT RULES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE ONE
ABOVE REFERENCED.
oh
Continuances of extensions of time will not be granted except
in accordance with Local Rule 220-9.
Max Thomsen, Courtroom Deputy
Clerk for Judge Stanley A. Weigel
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT a
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4.
Joseph Toussaint, et al
Plaintiff,
No. C. 73-1422 SAW
vs.
Daniel J. McCarthy, et al NOTICE
Defendant.
TO:
COUNSEL OF RECORD
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT the above entitled case has been continued
by the Court from March 26 to Thursday, April 2, 1987 at 2:15 pm for
hearing Plaintiff's motion for civil contempt re double celling at Folsom
San Francisco, California William L. Whittaker, Clerk
Dated: February 27, 1987
Tr
Max Thomsen, Deputy
ELT CP CR th ME
Fil.ED
IN TRE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
JAN 1 6 10R7
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ; :
THOMAS C. CAVER, CLER"
BY ies
PEPUTY CLERK
JOHN DILLARD, et al., )
Plaintiffs, )
Vv. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 85-T-1332-N
CRENSHAW COUNTY, etc., et al., )
Defendants. ;
ORDER
Counsel for the Lawrence County Defendants having orally informed
the court that the parties have resolved the issues raised by the Lawrence
County defendants' December 16, 1986, motion for stay pending appeal, it is
ORDERED that said motion is denied.
DONE, this the 16th day of January, 1987.
Pima)
DNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDCE —