Order Denying Motion for Stay

3 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Also includes Correspondence from Clerk to Counsel Notifying Hearing of Motion for Toussaint v. McCarthy dated 2/27/1987.

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Voting Rights
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
- Larry T. Menefee
- James U. Blacksher
Organizations
- LDF
- Blacksher, Menefee & Stein
Matter
- Dillard v. Crenshaw County
Case
- Dillard v. Crenshaw County
U.S. state
- Alabama
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- b3fcc6c0-b7d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9

Cite this item

Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Order Denying Motion for Stay, 1987. b3fcc6c0-b7d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/fa3b7117-3bcb-44f6-b8e0-b9e485b1138b/order-denying-motion-for-stay. Accessed May 09, 2025.

Copied!

    OFFICE OF THE CLERK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

. ER 4850 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE 

WilLAN rid J 
SAN FRANCISCO, CA. 94102 

(415) 556-3031 

TO: Counsel cof Record 

RE: Joseph Toussaint, et al v. Daniel McCarthy, et al; 

C 73-1422 SAW : 

A motion has been filed in this action noticed for hearing 

on Thursday, April 2,.1987 rat. 2:15 pm. Pursuant 
  

to Local Rule 220-3, opposition must be served and filed not later 

than March 19, 1987 , and reply to the opposition   

must be served and filed not later than March 26,1987 . 
  

THE COURT MAY IMPOSE SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO FULLY COMPLY 

WITH ALL RELEVANT RULES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE ONE 

ABOVE REFERENCED. 

oh 

Continuances of extensions of time will not be granted except 

in accordance with Local Rule 220-9. 

  

Max Thomsen, Courtroom Deputy 

Clerk for Judge Stanley A. Weigel 

 



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT a 

  

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4. 

Joseph Toussaint, et al 

Plaintiff, 

No. C. 73-1422 SAW 
  

vs. 

  

Daniel J. McCarthy, et al NOTICE 

Defendant. 

TO: 

COUNSEL OF RECORD 

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT the above entitled case has been continued 
by the Court from March 26 to Thursday, April 2, 1987 at 2:15 pm for 
hearing Plaintiff's motion for civil contempt re double celling at Folsom 

San Francisco, California William L. Whittaker, Clerk 

Dated: February 27, 1987 
  

Tr 
Max Thomsen, Deputy 
  

ELT CP CR th ME 

 



  

Fil.ED 
IN TRE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE 

JAN 1 6 10R7 
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ; : 

THOMAS C. CAVER, CLER" 
BY ies 
  

PEPUTY CLERK 

JOHN DILLARD, et al., ) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

Vv. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 85-T-1332-N 

CRENSHAW COUNTY, etc., et al., ) 

Defendants. ; 

ORDER   

Counsel for the Lawrence County Defendants having orally informed 

the court that the parties have resolved the issues raised by the Lawrence 

County defendants' December 16, 1986, motion for stay pending appeal, it is 

ORDERED that said motion is denied. 

DONE, this the 16th day of January, 1987. 

Pima) 
  

  DNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDCE —

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Order Denying Motion for Stay

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in