Memorandum of Swann ET AL. in Response to Motion as to Scheduling and Apportionment of Time for Oral Argument

Public Court Documents
October 1, 1970

Memorandum of Swann ET AL. in Response to Motion as to Scheduling and Apportionment of Time for Oral Argument preview

23 pages

Also includes response to suggestion that the court does not have jurisdiction of the appeal in the Moore case.

  • Case Files, Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hardbacks. Memorandum of Swann ET AL. in Response to Motion as to Scheduling and Apportionment of Time for Oral Argument, 1970. fec217d2-2e34-f111-88b4-7c1e527f53b4. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/fa6e1579-aa34-443a-974d-256806172a4e/memorandum-of-swann-et-al-in-response-to-motion-as-to-scheduling-and-apportionment-of-time-for-oral-argument. Accessed October 16, 2026.

    Copied!

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.