Correspondence from Neyhart to Smiley Re: Weber Material for Joint Appendix

Correspondence
August 4, 2000

Cite this item
Correspondence from Neyhart to Smiley Re: Weber Material for Joint Appendix preview

1 page

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Correspondence from Neyhart to Smiley Re: Weber Material for Joint Appendix, 2000. 2fd4059b-fb0e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/fc7aecba-74b1-40e3-b015-ed5dab555d64/correspondence-from-neyhart-to-smiley-re-weber-material-for-joint-appendix. Accessed July 01, 2025.

    Copied!

    SENT BY: ; 

H.O. EVERE | | (1878-1971) 
KATHRINE R. EVERETT (1683-1992) 

ROBINSON GO. EVERETT 

DAWN T, BATTISTE 
SANDRA G. HERRING 

  

OF COUNSEL 

ROBERT D. HOLLEMAN 

OF COUNSEL 

CRAIG M. KABATCHNICK 

(ADMITTED NC, D.C.) 

VIA FAX 

Ms. Tiare BB. Smiley 

» @ 682 5468; AlUG-4-00 "® 

EVERETT & EVERETT 
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 

SUITE 300 

301 W. MAIN STREET 

P.O. BOX 588 

DurHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 27702 

August 4, 2000 

Special Deputy Attorney General 
North Carolina Department of Justice 

Post Office Box 629 

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-0629 

Re: Weber Maternal for Joint Appendix 

Dear Tiare: 

PAGE 1/1 

TEL: (319) 682-5691 
FAX; (913) 882-5489 

[nclosed are our last set of corrections with regard to the material that has been sent wo us 

in respect to the Joint Appendix materials. In addition to the corrections noted on the attached 

sheets, we wish Lo pul back into Dr. Weber's report all of paragraph 55 as well as paragraphs 62 
and 63. Also, we wish to have the Rowan County data added to the other counties of District 12 

in Table 5. Tinally, there should be a note in Table 6 that the data for Davidson, Guilford, 

Iredell, Rowan, and Mecklenburg Counties have not been reprinted. 

As for Dr. Weber's deposition excerpts, we note that you did not have included 63:7-13 

which we had previously designated. ln our telephone conversation earlier today, Fran Carraway 

assured me that this will be taken care of. 

In another matter, Judge Everctt has told me that in the conversation he had with you 
concerning your request for an extension you were under the impression that the time for filing a 
reply brief was 10 days. 1 believe, however, that the rules authorize 30 days, but we certainly 

hope that at that point the filing can be accelerrated so we can get this appeal over with as 

quickly as possible. 

Sincerely, 

Sot a. Heft 
Scth Allen Neyhart 

cc Adam Stcin 

oC; Todd Cox

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top