Correspondence from Guinier to Stevas
Public Court Documents
May 9, 1985
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Correspondence from Guinier to Stevas, 1985. 16dd7443-de92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/01eb2db2-a6fd-4cc5-bb1d-134b30d3288a/correspondence-from-guinier-to-stevas. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
May 9, 1985
The llonorable Alexander L. Stevas
Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States
waltrington, D. c. 20543
Re: 83-1968 - Rufus L- Edmisten, et a1' v'
Ra1ph Ginqles, et a1-
Dear Mr. Stevas:
I am counsel of record for appellees. in the above
-"ftiorr.d case in which probable jurisdiction was
noled, April 29, 1985. Pursuant to our conversa-
tj.on of iray 3 , 1985, I write to alert you to a
poiential -problem I have regarding the briefing
ichedule dlscribed in the t{emorandum to Counsel in
a;;;" Granted Review on April 29, 1985' The brief
i;; appellents is now due June 13, 1985. Accordingly,
the brief for-aptelfees will be due in mid-July, 1985'
As I Stated during our conversation, I am also lead
counsel for one oi three co-defendants in a criminal
j;t case that is set for trial June 17, 1985 19lt!99
=- et al-'- Cr' No' 8500014
and Cr. No. g he trial is sched-
uled to last four weeks, during the same period in
whj_ch I would be preparing the brief for appe3-1ees.
I thought it prudent to bring this apEarent conflict
to youi attenlion early on. Counsel for appellants
havE stated they do nol object to my seeking an ex-
tensionoftimewithinwrrichtofilemybrief.
Thank you for your consideratj.on and assistance.
Respectful111 YovtVl
O*(,&,^*A*
Carol Lani Guinier
cLG/ x
cc: Jerris Leonard, Esg.
James Wallace, Esg.
\.rri'IETY NINE i-IlJDSON STFEET r,E,,v'/caK. \ Y 10013