Correspondence from Guinier to Stevas
Public Court Documents
May 9, 1985

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Correspondence from Guinier to Stevas, 1985. 16dd7443-de92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/01eb2db2-a6fd-4cc5-bb1d-134b30d3288a/correspondence-from-guinier-to-stevas. Accessed October 12, 2025.
Copied!
May 9, 1985 The llonorable Alexander L. Stevas Clerk Supreme Court of the United States waltrington, D. c. 20543 Re: 83-1968 - Rufus L- Edmisten, et a1' v' Ra1ph Ginqles, et a1- Dear Mr. Stevas: I am counsel of record for appellees. in the above -"ftiorr.d case in which probable jurisdiction was noled, April 29, 1985. Pursuant to our conversa- tj.on of iray 3 , 1985, I write to alert you to a poiential -problem I have regarding the briefing ichedule dlscribed in the t{emorandum to Counsel in a;;;" Granted Review on April 29, 1985' The brief i;; appellents is now due June 13, 1985. Accordingly, the brief for-aptelfees will be due in mid-July, 1985' As I Stated during our conversation, I am also lead counsel for one oi three co-defendants in a criminal j;t case that is set for trial June 17, 1985 19lt!99 =- et al-'- Cr' No' 8500014 and Cr. No. g he trial is sched- uled to last four weeks, during the same period in whj_ch I would be preparing the brief for appe3-1ees. I thought it prudent to bring this apEarent conflict to youi attenlion early on. Counsel for appellants havE stated they do nol object to my seeking an ex- tensionoftimewithinwrrichtofilemybrief. Thank you for your consideratj.on and assistance. Respectful111 YovtVl O*(,&,^*A* Carol Lani Guinier cLG/ x cc: Jerris Leonard, Esg. James Wallace, Esg. \.rri'IETY NINE i-IlJDSON STFEET r,E,,v'/caK. \ Y 10013