Letter to Professor Thad Beyle
Working File
March 24, 1983

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Letter to Professor Thad Beyle, 1983. 723fb537-d392-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/036de3a3-76c1-4554-97d8-f4bddfef3776/letter-to-professor-thad-beyle. Accessed April 18, 2025.
Copied!
t. n CHAMBERS. FERGUSON, WATT, WALLAS. ADKINS & FULLER, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LA\M SUITE 73O EAST INDEPENDENCE PLAZA 951 SOUTH INOEPENOENCE BOULEVARD CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA 28202 TELEPHONE (704) 375-8461 l{arch 24, 1983 JULIUS LEVONNE CHAMBERS JAMES E, FERGUSON. II MELVIN L, WATT JONATHAN WALLAS KARL ADKINS JAMES C, FULLER. JR, YVONNE MIMS EVANS JOHN \^/, GRESHAM RONALD L, GIBSON GILDA F, GLAZER LESLIE J. WINNER JOHN T. NOCKLEBY' .oF O.C. BAR ALSO Professor Thad Beyle Department of Political Science Chapel Hi1l, North Carolina 275L4 Re: Gingles v. Edmlsten Dear Thad: Please know I In any helpful pardon my extreme delay in writing this letter. I promissed to contact you in a week, not a month. event, I did enjoy our conversation. It was very to me. It is my understanding that we c€rme to the following agreement, subject to my getting funding approval: 1.. You will- supervise a grad student to study the I-ingering effects of discrimination in registration and voting in North Carolina. If the results warrant it, you will then be prepared to testify on that topic. 2. You will ask Mark Lanier, who is currently studying the majority vote requirement for North Carolina Insights, to include the racial impact of the majority vote require- ment in his study. You will then also be prepared to testify on that topic. 3. You will study the tenuousness of the policy of using whole counties as the building blocks for legislative districts in the North Carolina Legislature considering, in particular, the changing role of the -t Professor Thad Beyle l,larch 24, 1983 Page 2 Legislature in county gevernment and alternate ways that the legitimate needs of county governments can be met. To do this you estimated a cost of $600. This is broken down into 50 hours of graduate student time at $6 per hour plus $:OO to you which-incl-udes your supervision oi the graduate students and incidental expenses. Pursuant to our _origila1 agreement with Pete Harkinsr w€ have alreadypaid you for two days of time to prepare court testimony and time in court. I have discussed this proposal with my co-counsel, and she agrees that it is a good arrangement and that we ought to pursue it. I hope that my delay in writing you has not made it impossibLe. rt wilr be extremely useful information and I bel-ieve that you will be a good-witness. If there are any probl-ems, p1-ease gi-ve me a ca11. As I t-ol-d- you, our court date has been set for Ju1.y 25. We probably need to have the testimony basically rbady and exhibits identified by at least two months prior to that date. If this will present a major time problem, please let me know. You also agreed to see if you can discover anyone who is knowledgeable about racial appeals and elections in general or in North Carolina in particular. If you have been suc- cessful in finding such a person, I would appreciate your telling me so that I can contact him or her.- If you !r?r. any questions about any of this, please give me a caJ-l. In the meantime, I hope that you are doing well and enjoying the springtime. LJW: ddb cc: Ms. Lani Guiner Mr. Steve Suitts rely, eslie In/inner