Annotated List of Exhibits

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Date is approximate.

LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorney
- Leslie J. Winner
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 012ae2f3-de92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Annotated List of Exhibits, 1983. 012ae2f3-de92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/07cb73ad-65e9-4327-9e63-703c94946c1d/annotated-list-of-exhibits. Accessed May 21, 2025.

Copied!

    III. LISTS OF EXHIBITS

A. Gingles Plaintiffs List of Exhibits

Number

10.

ll.

12.

13.

Title

Vita of Bernard N. Grofman

Senate Plan, Chapter 2, 1982 2nd Extra
Session (Map)

House Plan, Chapter 1, 1982 2nd Extra
Session (Map)

(a) and (b) House District 36, Mecklen—
burg County, Map and Legend

(a) and (b) House District 39, Forsyth
County (Part), Map and Legend

(a) and (b) House District 23, Durham
County, Map and Legend

(a) and (b) House District 21, Wake
County, Map and Legend

(a) and (b) House District 8, Wilson,
Edgecombe and Nash Counties, Map and
Legend

(a) and (b) Senate District 22, Mecklen-
burg and Cabarrus Counties, Map and
Legend »

(a) and (b) Senate District 2, Map and
Legend

”Effects of Multimember State House and
Senate Districts in Eight NorthCarolina
Counties, 1978-82,” Grofman, 1983

"An Outline for Racial Bloc Voting
Analysis,” Grofman, 1983

(a) and (b) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Mecklenburg County, Senate 1978(Primary
and General)

(c) and (d) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Cabarrus County, Senate 1978 (Primary
and General)

(e) and (f) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Mecklenburg and Cabarrus Counties, Senate 1978
(Primary and General)
-50-
Amended

Defendants

Objection

No
No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Objection
Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Number

14.

15.

16.

Title

(g) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Mecklenburg County, Senate 1980
(Primary only)

(h) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Cabarrus County, Senate 1980 (Primary
only)

(i) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Mecklenburg/Cabarrus Counties, Senate
1980 (Primary only)

(j) and (k) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Mecklenburg County, Senate 1982 (Primary
and General)

(1) and (m) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Cabarrus County, Senate 1982 (Primary
and General)

(n) and (o) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Mecklenburg/Cabarrus Counties, Senate
1982 (Primary and General)

(p) Charlotte Observer, April 17, 1980,
April 19, 1980, April 22, 1980, April
30, 1980

 

(a) and (b) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Mecklenburg County, House, 1980(Primary
and General)

(c) and (d) Racial Bloc VotingAnalysis,
Mecklenburg County, House, 1982(Primary
and General)

(a) and (b) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Forsyth County, House 1978 (Primary
and General)

(c) and (d) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Forsyth County, House 1980 (Primary and
General

(e) and (f) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Forsyth County, House 1982 (Primary and
General

(h) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis, Forsyth
County, Senate 1980 (Primary)

(a) and (b) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Durham County, House 1978 (Primary and
General)

(c) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,Durham
County, House 1980 (General)

-51-
Amended

Defendants

Objection

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Defendants
Number _ Title Objection

(d) and (e) Racial Bloc VotingAnalysis,

Durham County, House 1982 (Primary and ho
General)
(f) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,Durham No
County, Senate 1978 (General)

17. (a) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis, Wake No
County, House 1978 (Primary)
(b) and (c) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis, No
Wake County, House 1980 (Primary)
(d) and (e) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis, No
Wake County, House 1982 (Primary and
General)

18. (a) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis, No
Edgecombe County, House 1982 (Primary)
(b) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,Wilson No
County, House 1982 (Primary)
(c) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis, Nash No
County, House 1982 (Primary)
(d) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis, House No
District No. 8, House 1982 (Primary)
(e) and (f) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis, No
Edgecombe County, Congress 1982 (First
and Second Primaries)
(g) and (h) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis, No
Wilson County, Congress 1982 (First and
Second Primaries)
(i) and (j) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis, No
Nash County, Congress 1982 (First and
Second Primaries)
(k) and (l) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis, No
Edgecombe County Commission 1982(Primary
and General)
(m) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis, Wilson No
County, County Commission 1976 (Primary)
(n) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis, Nash No

County, County Commission 1982 (Primary)

(0) and (p) Racial Bloc Voting Analysis,
Wilson—Edgecombe—Nash, Congress 1982
(First and Second Primaries)

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection*

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

Objection

7"Defendants contend that analysis of counties is irrelevant.

-52-
Amended

Number

19.

20.

21.
22.

23.

24.

25.
26.

27.

28.

Defendants

Title Objection
Electoral Participation and Success No Objection
by Race, 1970-1982
”The Disadvantageous Effects of At— No Objection

Large Elections on the Success of
Minority Candidates for the Charlotte
and Raleigh City Councils," Grofman,

 

 

1983

Vita of Harry L. Watson None

Raleigh News and Observer, 1/30/1898, (22-37)

Cartoon Relevance, materia-
lity and hearsay (as

Raleigh News and ObServer, 10/15/1898, to the truth of the

Cartoon substance)

Raleigh News and Observer, 7/4/1900,
Cartoon

 

"White People Wake Up,” Leaflet, 1950

(a) Raleigh News and Observen 5/26/54,
(Alton Lennon Political Advertisement)

 

(b) Raleigh News and Observer, 5/27/54,
(Kerr Scott Political Advertisement)

 

(c) Raleigh News and Observer, 5/28/54,
(Kerr Scott Political Advertisement)

 

(d) Raleigh News and Observer, 5/28/54,
”Alton Lennon Forces Flood”

 

(e) Raleigh News and Observer, 5/29/54,
(Alton Lennon Political Advertisement)

 

(a) Raleigh News and Observer, 5/19/60,
”Lake Sturing Passions on Desegregation
Issues"

 

(b) Raleigh News and Observer, 5/26/60,
(Lake Political Advertisement)

 

(c) Raleigh News and Observer, 5/26/60,
(Lake Political Advertisement)

 

Raleigh News and Observer, 6/2/64,”Moore

 

Seeks Runoff”

-53-

Number

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

39.
40.

41.

Title

Charlotte News, 5/21/64, Political
Advertisement (Moore)

Raleigh NewsauuiObserver, 6/21/64,
Political Advertisement (Preyer)

Raleigh News and Observer, 10/14/64,
Political Advertisement (Goldwater)

Raleigh News and Observer, 11/7/66,
"Jones Charges East With Smear'Tactics"

 

Raleigh News and ObserVer, 10/20/68,
Political Advertisement (Bob Scott)

Raleigh News and Observer, 11/2/68,
Political Advertisement (Jim Gardner)

Raleigh News and Observer, 10.25/65,
Political Advertisement (Wallace)

 

' Charlotte News, 10/29/68, Political

A vertisement (Wallace)

(a) Raleigh News and Observer, 5/5/72,
(Political Advertisement, United
Concerned Citizens of Raleigh)

 

(b) Raleigh News and Observer, 10/18/22,
(Political Advertisement — Democrats
for Helms)

(c) Raleigh News and Observer, 10/27/72,
(Political Advertisement — Democrats
for Helms)

(d) Raleigh News and Observer,11/10/72,
(Political Advertisement - Democrats
for Helms)

White and Black Voter Registration in
11 Southern States

[omitted]

Voter Registration by Race: North
Carolina V. Statewide, 1960—1982(graph)

Black Elected Officials in North
Carolina, 1970-1981

-54-

Defendants

Objection

Relevance, materia-
lity, hearsay

Relevance, materia-
lity, hearsay

Inadequate
foundation

Number

42.

v// 43.

lzgijgw/ as.
. 4Q@\

4?.

 

4@.

Title

Statutes providing for segregation
Vita of Paul Luebke

Durham Morning Herald, 9/10/76,
Political Advertisement (Green)

 

Charlotte Observer, 9/12/79,Letter
to the Editor

 

‘Charlotte ObServer, 9/18/79,Editorial

 

'Charlotte Observer, 9/21/79,Politica1
Advertisement (knox)

 

Charlotte Observer, 9/23/79,Politica1
Advertisement (Knox) (2 pp)

 

Charlotte Observer, 9/26/79, News

Analysis

 

Durham Morning Herald, 4/ /80,Artic1e

 

Durham Morning Herald, 5/4/80,Politica1
Advertisement

 

Raleigh News and Observer, 10/28/80,
11MorganChargesOpponent”

 

North Carolina Anvil, 5/15/81, "Durham
Democrats Endorse White Slate”

Letters from Tim Valentine Campaign

'(a-h) Political Advertisements by'Helms

for Senate, 1983

" Charlotte Observer, 6/9/83, ”Ads
ignal Helms-Hunt Race”

(j) List of Newspapers in which Helms
Ads were run

Durham Morning Herald, 7/25/82, re:
Second Primary

North Carolina Institute of Govern—

ment, Legislative Reporting Service,
2/11/83

-55-

Defendants

Objection

None
None

(44—51)

Relevance, materia-
lity, and hearsay
(as to the truth of
the substance)

Relevance, materia-
lity, hearsay

Relevance, materia—
lity

Relevance, materia-
lity, hearsay (as to
truth of substance)

'J’,

None

Relevance, materia—
lity, hearsay

None

Number

56.

57.
58.
59.

‘60.
61.
62.
63.
64.

65.

66.
67.
68.
69.

70.
70A.
70B.

71.

72.

Demographic
County

Demographic
Demographic
Demographic
Demographic

Demographic
County

Demographic
Demographic

Demographic
County

Demographic
County

Demographic
Demographic
Demographic

Demographic
County

Demographic

Demographic

Title

Abstract of Mecklenburg

Abstract
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract

Abstract

Abstract
Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract
Abstract
Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

of
of
of
of
of

of
of
of

of

of
of
of
of

of
of

ForsythCounty
Durham County
Wake County

Wilson County

Edgecombe

Nash County
HalifaxCounty

Northampton
Hertford

Gates County
Martin County
Bertie County

Washington

Chowan County

State as whole

Charlotte Observer, 6/21/83, "Scores
Show Black Students Narrowing Gap”

”Patterns of Pay in North Carolina
State Government," Office of State
Personnel, Executive Summary

”Institutional Racism/Sexism in North

Carolina State Government."

and 48-65.

pp. 1-24a

-56_

Defendants
Objection

None

None
None
None

None

None
None
None

None
None

None
None
None

None

None

None

None

71-74

Defendants stipulate
that these four docu-
ments are authentic
and were produced at
the request of the
North Carolina State
Government. Defen—
dants object on the

Number

73.

74.

75.
75A.
76.
77.
78.

79.

80.

Title

”Housing for North Carolinians:

Policy and Action Recommendations,"
North Carolina Department ofNatural
Resources and Community Development

“North Carolina Housing Element,"
1972, North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and Community Deve—
lopment, pp. 10-17

.Vita of Thad L. Beyle

Letter from Huskins to Sullivan

Campaign Finance Reports from Mecklen-
burg County General Assembly Elections

Campaign Finance Reports from Forsyth
County General Assembly Elections

Campaign Finance Reports from Durham
County General Assembly Elections

Campaign Finance Reports from Wake
County General Assembly Elections

Voter Turnout, Registration Data and

.Vote Abstract from Ballance—Hux

81.

82.

83.

84.

85.

Primary, 1982

Campaign Finance Reports from Hux-
Ballance election, 1982

Vita of Alex W. Willingham

Excerpts from the Transcripts of the

House and Senate RedistrictingCommittees

and of the Senate floor debate

Raleigh News and Observer, 2/10/1982,

House and Senate District plans Advance”

Appointments of Women, Blacks andIndians

Defendants
Objection

grounds of relevance
materiality, hearsay
and opinion.testimony

None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None

Hearsay

(a) Comparison of nine executive«officials Hearsay

(Table 5)

(b) Comparison of Governor Hunt and former Hearsay

Governor Holshouser

-57-

Defendants

Number Title Objection
(c) Boards and Commissions with no Hearsay
Blacks
(d) Explanation of Criteria Hearsay

-58-

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Annotated List of Exhibits

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorney

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in