Draft of Gingles v. Edmisten and Pugh v. Hunt Stipulation 1
Working File
February 1, 1982
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Williams. Draft of Gingles v. Edmisten and Pugh v. Hunt Stipulation 1, 1982. c94347e3-da92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/09995a17-4111-4c74-9b86-aed63e210ae7/draft-of-gingles-v-edmisten-and-pugh-v-hunt-stipulation-1. Accessed October 08, 2025.
Copied!
ll ,_-_..... _
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \
~ -- / FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
//// RALEIGH DIVISION
// I A; I, ‘
// _, I u_.L,A 11‘ _§.V
RALPH GINGLES, et al-ia _iil , é+—~
Plaintiffs )
,. ) '
vs. // ) I No. 81—803—CIV—5
)
)
)
RUFUS EDMISTEN, et al., ////
. Defenda ts
ALAN V. PUG et al.,
Plaintiffs
NO. 81-1066-CIV-5
HUNT, JR., etc., et alJ,
Defendants
vvvvvvv
STIPULATION
/’The parties in the above—entitled actions, by and througn\
speétirA'" ’W' bQZStipulate”afid’E§Eeehas follows:
kjwb
422? By letter g; 30 November 1981, the Office of the
0b. .
United States Attorney General interposed objection tojtwo—p¥§§3EEH{
amendments to the Constitution of North Carolina, Article 11,
Sections 3(3) and :é%%i§%%§é§§§§§§é%%i:>
A .
$22 <£§:ietté%~qf 7 pecember 1981, the effieeJGé—the-United
Mk. . u¥ JLCh;
States Attorney General a Vise the State that lt-WOQid—aflfiéfflxzmfifififir/
‘4
MC
Chapter 894 (S.B. 87, 1981) at Chapter 821 (S.B. 313, 1981), North
Carolina's reapportionment plans for the State Senate and the Unite
States Congress (Attachment B). Isfgf’
(3) By letter of 20 anuary 1982, the Office of the
l advised the State that it would nd§%
'55:;
pre—clear Chapter 1130 .B. 1428, 1981), North Carolina's reappOflfiz
(4) 9 February 19
I
Assembly conv ned for the purpose 0
/
for the State House of Representatives,
the North Carolina General 'I‘fifif
enacting apportionment plmSv'
tate Senate, and United‘
States Congress;