Memorandum from Suitts to North Carolina Reapportionment Group
Correspondence
February 23, 1982

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Williams. Memorandum from Suitts to North Carolina Reapportionment Group, 1982. 6df9b6b8-da92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/09c014df-2e97-4ef8-8293-5eea37a02aa7/memorandum-from-suitts-to-north-carolina-reapportionment-group. Accessed May 21, 2025.
Copied!
TONY HAFRISON. Prca6.nl MAnY FMilcES OERFNER. vrclPrca6.nl a a JULIUS L. CHAUBERS. P.sl Prr6id.nt STEVE SUlfTS. Erruliw Di,xtd a JOS€PH HA.IS. Cartt!.| 75 MARIETTA STREET, N.TV. ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 (aoa) 522-87C4 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: The N. C. Reapportionment Working Group Steve Suitts Work to be Done Since Our Meeting of Wednesday, February L7 DATE: February 23, 1982 For perhaps understandable reasons I have resisted over the last few days the duty of reviewing our conversations of the last neeting. Yet, today I fully realize that, were he still with us, Raymond would have already called to ask about the latest word and work in our efforts. So, I'11 try to recollect here what we intend to accomplish or set in motion before our next neeting on Tuesday, March 9, at 10:00 A.M. in Charlotte or Raleigh. (Leslie or Julius will let us know in the next few days where we will be traveling.) 1. Julius and Leslie will initiate meetings and contacts with folks in Durham to understand their perspectives, suggestions, and evidence in objection to the congressional plan. With that infor- mation and understanding, werl1 act accordingLy. 2. Leslie will distribute to everyone a summary of the alternative house and senate plans that were produced by Harkins. 3. In keeping with the thrust of our initial examination of the house plan, Steve will see to it that we have analyses and model single-member district plans that are designed so that they: a. Improve Cumberland Coulty by creating a single- member district with a rnajority black population within the proposed multi-member district number 18; b. Attempt to create a majority black district and a majority Indian district in Hoke, Roberson, and Scotland Counties; c. Create a majority black district in Nash, Edgecombe, and itlilson Counties; d. Improve the voting strength of blacks in all districts lvith covered counties norr'proposed as part of multi- nenrber distri.cts; Attempt to create a majority'b1ack single-member -) MEMORANDUM Fe5Tualy-Zs, 1982 The N.C. Reapportionment Working Group Page Two district between major rnetropolitan areas and surrounding covered jurisdictions. 4. In keeping with our initial examination of the state senate p1an, Steve will see that analyses and model plans are drafted so, that they: a. Demonstrate the insufficiency of the 5L.72 majority black district in the blackbelt and that other non-diluting options were available to the legislature; b. Attenpt to create a majority black district in the same area which the legislature could have adopted; c. Attempt to create a single-member majority, non-white district in Hoke, Roberson, and Scotland Counties; d. Improve on the voting strength of blacks in all covered counties proposed as a part of nulti-member districts ; e. Attenpt to create majority black single- member districts between major metropolitan counties and surrounding covered jurisdictions. 5. Leslie will be responsible for drafting the final letter to the Justice Department, asking that it object to the state plans on behalf of the clients in light of these analyses. 6. Leslie will take comments from each of us about further inquiries and research needed surrounding the 1965-1966 reapportionment of the legislature relating to the work of Harry Watson. It would be helpful if everyone provided copies of these suggestions to everyone else, so werd all keep up with the direction of the inquiry. 8. Steve will continue to supervise the research of the SRC clippings files into the patterns, themes, and techniques of racial discrimination in North Carolina, especiallv relating to voting, in keeping with the report distributed at our Iast meeting. 9. Julius will secure a final word for Ne11 Painter tor her involvc-ment in developing the final history of discrirnination in 7. Leslie will have Watson investigate the "open" papers for Hugh White to gauge the utility of those papers and others and will file a motion for the state to produce the archives of the other relevant politicians where the custody of those papers are now in the hands of the state. I'IEM0RANDUI'[ TEEruary 7s, L98?. The N.C. Reapportionment Working Group Page Three the state and will organize a neeting of the principals including Dr. Painter, to review the special needs relating to scholarship in the context of this lawsuit. 10. Lani and Steve will contact Gordon Henderson to find out if he can help develop a statewide plan based upon what has been done heretofore. Steve will contact Pete Harkins to make arrangements, one way or the other, for an improved p1an. Our needs here are for a revised plan that avoids more diligently diluting the voting strength of minorities and observes 1ocal political factors. 11. Napoleon will prepare a draft of a brief that casts the argunent by which our case for a purposeful discrimination can be proven and won. LZ. Leslie and Julius non-covered counties and Leslie vention. 13. Leslie will amend in light of the new plans whicht'theory of affirmative duty." will speak with new clients from will prepare papers for their inter- and supplement our existing complaint the state has adopted and with the 14. Leslie will file a motion for the certification of our class in the lawsuit. 15. Each of us will submit to Leslie a list of who we believe should be deposed in the lawsuit in the areas of discovery in which we are interested. 16. All of us will submit to Leslie a list of the documents that we think defendants should produce in this case. 17. Steve is setting up a file of the relevant clippings from the Raleigh News and Observer and the few other clips that we have from othe ought to the meeting last time. I think that's the summary for now. should keep some folks busy. S. T. S. Until March the gth, it