Memorandum Opinion and Order

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 4223f6bf-d492-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Memorandum Opinion and Order, 1984. 4223f6bf-d492-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/121715da-bc22-451c-8908-314f4c7a773b/memorandum-opinion-and-order. Accessed December 04, 2025.

Copied!

    'rt
a.

a-

UNTTED STATES
EASTERN DISTRICT

RALETGH

DISTRICT COURT
OF NORTH CAROLTNA
DIVIS ION

*qILED

RALPH GfNGLES, €t al.
Plaintiffs,

vs.

RUFUS L. EDMISTEN, €t al.
Defendants.

No.8I-803-CIV-S

ORDER

Por the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion of the

court filed this duy;

It is ADJUDGED and ORDERED that:
I- Chapters I and 2 of the North Carolina Session Laws of

the second Extra session of LgB2 (1982 redistricting pran) are
decrared to violate section ? of the voting Rights AcL of r9G5,

amended June 29 , L982, 42 u.s.c. s 1973, by the creation of ttre
forrowing regisrative districts: senate Districts Nos.-2 and

22, and House of Representatives Districts Nos. g, 2I,23,36,
and 39.

2. Pending-- furthet orders- of .this court, the
defendants, th.ir - ug"nt= una employees, d!€-enjoined fiom
conducting any primary or general elections to elect members of
the State senate or state House of Representatives to
reoresent, inter aria, tegister.ed brack voters resident in any

of the areas now included within the legislative districts
identified in paragraph I. of this . Order, whether



\
,1

t: J'-
2-

pursuant to the LgB2 redisEricting planr or any revised or new

plan

This order does not purport to enjoin the conduct of any

other primary or general elections that the state of North

Carolina may see fit to conduct to elect members of the Senate

or House of Representatives.under the rg}2 redistricting plan,
or to elect candidates for un, other offices than those of the
state senate and ilouse of Representatives. see N.c.G.s. L2o-2.1
(1983 Cum. Supp. ) .

3. Jurisdiction of this court is retained to entertain
the submission of a revisedltegisrative districting pran by the

defendants, or to enter a further remedial decree, in acccrdance

with the Memorandum opinion filed today in this action.
4. The award of costs and attorneys fees as pralzed by

praintiffs is deferred pendjng entry of a final judgment r ot
such earlier date as may be shown required in the interests of
justice.

United States Circuit JuCg'e

Distr ict

iltnklin f. D[pGe, Jr.
Senior United States Distr.ict

:.-'l
.IuCAetl
tlA

Juutnu

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in