Memorandum from Suitts to North Carolina Reapportionment Group

Correspondence
August 20, 1981

Memorandum from Suitts to North Carolina Reapportionment Group preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Williams. Memorandum from Suitts to North Carolina Reapportionment Group, 1981. 65b6dae8-d992-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/171a0802-4105-4046-9473-bde71356d311/memorandum-from-suitts-to-north-carolina-reapportionment-group. Accessed April 22, 2025.

    Copied!

    \
O -r,r-',.:1 ,- :r.lV;l;r(; .'t!' i .i -,-t

:'i,i:-.'i.i a!r:-'.,41 J:l:: t ..,-'-.:j.,

AiLAtITA. GEOR.SIA 303C3 (i3J I 5:2-476.

DATE: August ?C, 1931

MElrgRAUpulr

lJ: l-olth Carolina il,e:pJ;o1'i:j.onnent Group

.'.ill.1: Stet'e Suitts

ll.i: .'. rcvierr of ou1' ne'Jting cf Augus:- 17

I ii:nt to rei'j.ati tl:e !r:"giiiigitts
:--, i;i3t ',.e ni-qht be i'e;tndr'd of '.tliat
.:l:re, [",.'- riho:al and b,v :;]iat iate.

cur iteeting on ilo;cay
3gr:ced neeCs to be

i':::erning Conire-.siol:l re,:listri:ting, cLlr dj.-;:ussi\s
:c-'i:sed on the chang.es i:t District Tt;o and the failure of Nre

^-- -^-- 
:.': !!-^--a - l^---^I--1 ^.-- \al-',.'isi:iiure to i:rcl.uil.r Durl:an Ccunty, ;iithcut :r bieikJcl';;l

: ctlstration fisure-i or voter turnout rates bv iace. l'Je 
";e

cslstration figr-rre-i or voter turnout rates o)' iace, 1';e 
";ei'e

:'u:',ian Count)'tras left out Dec3use ts1a:lt registration and tui'no
i;:ab1e to deternine if there is support fcr the argunent th:T N;). r ":. ,.

:.i.s \'onsiderabl,v higirer than in most otl)3r cor.rnpies rvirich here
.;:;iuil",rl i;ithin District Ti';:, if avaiJ.able, thtis sLlpDorting
.::i:-i ::iEht counter, :o sone extent. the rebutial tlrat iltere is
, .::;' an abrsciute Clife:'3rlce ol' ,cour perceiltsee li[ni: l're i".';;'l
l'i-rtiict Trn'o as it stantis a::3 Disirict Two rvith Durilam but
., t iliout AlarTlance and Chathan Counties.

. \;:rerently the iiepublican PartY has filed objectiLrns ic

.-c:rulessional District lrumber Tiuo rriith the l'ietu that it diiutes
,' i:i.'1. r'oting strength. iulius Ciianbers connitt,.'d his firn tc tlte
::i,:i. r:i obtaining a cot)y of the letter of ol:jection filed br'
t.:.-' .lr:.rb1icans. lriiilo no :ssigi:nent. 1';as :nade, f i1 cc;;r.it us
i.,,::itlreling the registt'.ltion d:lta, e;C 3s best as av:ilabLe
. r:l:-"r:;iion-peinits, tui'ncui 'l3ta for ihl' a?p1ice'rie couriies.

n the J:':it of the cc;tplaint r':iiicl'r Leslie liln;ier
tre agreed that a rederal aciion ought to be cc:;.3nced,
t t!:e 3pplicsble secticns of tire licith Caroliila state
::rd tire proioseC )iorth Carolina reapporticr:;eii plan

xcusos cf ':lle Gcneral lssenb11'r'iolate Secticn 5 and
t:re t,':r:i:'t:i P.ig:l-'s.\:t and viollte tite lJth:i:'ld 15th

l::::ed o
L.l ted.
i ng tlia
itutron

- !_ 1

-r;: I of
^ i] L-\ .

- 11 r-r I a _ .\



î n.r.ro )

-issenl)1v has both thc nu:':csL5 anC c:rcct of rscial Ciscrir..,in:lti.on
i.n voti.ng. 'i'iris 1.'iter s;rou1d be sirpp6llsd as niuch,rs pcrsSible b1'
3i1 ani11'sis 1-rf the el:.€e,:t of tire prL.tposed p1an. Tl're ".nai)-sis ln'i11be iargely the responsibiLity' of the- South-ern Regio:::r1 Counci.1.

For both actions, 'iie agreed that some historical research
needs to be :cnnissior.rei oir the origins and purnoses of the
s tate const j :utional pror-is ions requiri.ng respect f or count,v
lilg: ir re.irportionnenr. Julius agreed-to check rvith EcdyIfilliams of the Joint Center for Political StuCies to deteimineif one of their schclars could carry out the research. If not,Julius rvi1l check r"ith 1oca1 historians.

Fina11y, 
-tr'e. 

agreed that the optinal plans for reapportioninc
both houses of the C<;'ircr.:1 -{ssenbly to giv'e maxinun voiing s tre;rqtl:to Blacks needed to be fornulated. 'lfe rvculd tr)'to har.e t:;s plins
clevelopgd .- one rvhich gr.,'e scme respect to countl lines anc theotner r*hich s inp11, rras based o;1 cenius tr'act dati . Ilic.lrarC. rilein
a-qreed to explore availalrle resources, cctnputer-s, and progl'rinners,
tuith a fetn' of the national orgeni:aticns, and ila1'mond itheeler
agreed to inquiie rvith local experts in 1oca1 institutioas.

h'ith agreement about these courses of action and tasks, .,,3

pro j ected the f ollorr.ing tinetable :

1

August 51. 19S1: Leslie r,'i11 hal-e circulated
receT\€A-tTiET ccnnents about the dreft of the
and rsi11 have placed it in federal court;

an.l
conD i; i:r I

S_gp-19.rlr!_qr 1J, 1931: By this Cate the Southern Ilegionel
edrmEifrilTf-TfIE-prepared its analysis of the effects
of the proposed reapportion;nent p1an, circulated s;ld
received conrlents on i ts draf t ietter of ob jection, aadfiled the letter of objection on behalf of tire locaI \trti:
car'olina group" If the Justice Departilent r'eciuests acJi -

tional infornation on the reapportionmeitt plan a;rd the
tiinetable f cr Ei ling a leiter of ob je cticr: is e:(t(-:rie.l.
filing may be postponed;

Octobe=r 15 -50. 19S1: 3r'th:.s .-ine R.icl:ard e:rJ L:',.:cnd....'_.--ri:.I1 hel'e nrCe cc,ntacts, decis ions abcut ,.;!to ca;.i. p:cduce
n9q91- legisLatir-e p1ans.rvi11 irave been nade, and the plens
lri11 have been produced;

)Jgrsnirer' I, i3.j:_ gy this {o!", Julius :;i11 har-e _:s'cu:-ed
? r'-.searcnc'r to pi'.:Enet c:'igi.ns and purposes of tjre state
constitr::lcral i:r'J\.i.s:c;r-; :rnd the researcher :;i11 har,-e
a p:^c1ini:::::'.,' .^..)c:t :it'::i 1:rbl.e. A f inal Cccunent of
:'c jearcir' i;: t1.., itr:,r, shoulJ be ccnpi"t"a bl, Deconber 1S

l',':r113',rc ::ri'l::l'.'3 a ,1.:)r:elr:::.: :a11 before th: nicdle :f Saptc:-.'-,:
',;i-1 ;t!:rccJ tJ ilrrct 1:t -;r:tri.:itc )n'i.) .').{3in on Septcnb,-.r 1c 3t 10:r.)C -:.-.i:'l ti:-' sr:3 ii-''r',' 3.iJrr::c.l r:i'>ns. I :..ilk this i.-s rrhero tr'e stxnil a::d
:J"{ pi:coeJ.

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top