Correspondence from Chachkin to Clerk Re: The School Town of Speedway, IN v. Dillin

Brief in Opposition to Certiorari preview

20 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
LDF Attorneys
- Jack Greenberg
- Norman J. Chachkin
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Milliken v. Bradley
Case
- Milliken v. Bradley
U.S. state
- Michigan
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 0f1990db-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0

Cite this item

Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Correspondence from Chachkin to Clerk Re: The School Town of Speedway, IN v. Dillin, 1972. 20aacae7-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/8da2f262-73e0-45f6-9cd5-5da83513c51b/correspondence-from-chachkin-to-clerk-re-the-school-town-of-speedway-in-v-dillin. Accessed April 05, 2025.

Copied!

    May 30, 1972

Hon. Michael Rodak,' Jr., Clerk 
Supreme Court of the United States 
Washington, D. C. 20543

Re: The School Town of Speedway,
Indiana, et al. v. Dillin, et al. No. 71-1260

Dear Mr. Rodak:
I have been made acquainted with the contents of the response which has been, or 

will shortly be, filed by the United States in 
connection with the pending petition for a writ 
of certiorari in the above-captioned matter.

Since we are in agreement with the 
position of the United States, the respondents 
whom I represent (the intervening plaintiffs 
below, Buckley et al.) do not desire to file a 
separate brief in opposition to certiorari.

1

I am taking this opportunity, therefore, to formally waive our right to separately 
respond; I should appreciate your notifying the 
Court that we join in the position of the United 
-States. Additional copies of this letter are enclosed for your convenience.

ji

Very truly yours,

A-* < /c. (
Norman J. Chachkin 
Attorney for Respondents Buckley et al.

'■

cc: Hon. Erwin N. Griswold
William F. Harvey, Esq. 

' Harold E. Hutson, Esq. 
Frank Campbell, Esa.

J '

iI-

I O  C O L U M B U S  C I R C L E 5 8 6 - 8 3 9 7 N E W  Y O R K ,  N . Y .  1 0 0 1 9



May 30, 1972

Hon. Michael Rodak,' Jr., Clerk 
Supreme Court of the United States 
Washington, D. C. 20543

Re: The School Town of Speedway,
Indiana, et al. v. Dillin, et al. No. 71-1260

Dear Mr. Rodak:
I have been made acquainted with the contents of the response which has been, or 

will shortly be, filed by the United States in 
connection with the pending petition for a writ 
of certiorari in the above-captioned matter.

Since we are in agreement with the 
position of the United States, the respondents 
whom I represent (the intervening plaintiffs 
below, Buckley et al.) do not desire to file a 
separate brief in opposition to certiorari.

1i

I am taking this opportunity, there
fore, to formally waive our right to separately 
respond; I should appreciate your notifying the 
Court that we join in the position of the United 
-States. Additional copies of this letter are enclosed for your convenience.

Very truly.yours,

'/■/{t'i/U'rtc t C
Norman J. Chachkin 
Attorney for Respondents 

Buckley et al.
\

f

cc: Hon. Erwin N. Griswold
William F. Harvey, Esq. 

• Harold E. Hutson, Esq. 
Frank Campbell, Esq.

t o  C O L U M B U S  C I R C L E 5 8 6 - 8 3 9 7 N E W  Y O R K ,  N . Y .  1 0 0 1 9



May 30, 1972

Hon. Michael Rodak, Jr., Clerk 
Supreme Court of the United States 
Washington, D. C. 20543

Re: The School Town of Speedway,
Indiana, et al. v. Dillin, et al No. 71-1260

Dear Mr. Rodak:
I have been made acquainted with the contents of the response which has been, or 

will shortly be, filed by the United States in 
connection with the pending petition for a writ 
of certiorari in the above-captioned matter.

Since we are in agreement with the 
position of the United States, the respondents 
whom I represent (the intervening plaintiffs 
below, Buckley et,al.) do not desire to file a 
separate brief in opposition to certiorari.

I am taking this opportunity, therefore, to formally waive our right to separately 
respond; I should appreciate your notifying the 
Court that we join in the position of the United 
•States. Additional copies of this letter are enclosed for your convenience.

Very truly yours,

Norman J. Chachkin 
Attorney for Respondents Buckley et al.

cc: Hon. Erwin N. Griswold William F. Harvey, Esq. 
Harold E. Hutson, Esq. 
Frank Campbell, Esq.

I O  C O L U M B U S  C I R C L E 5 8 6 - 8 3 9 7 N E W  Y O R K ,  N . Y .  1 0 0 1 9



May 30, 1972

Hon. Michael Rodak, Jr., Clerk 
Supreme Court of the United States 
Washington, D. C. 20543

Re: The School Town of Speedway,
Indiana, et al. v. Dillin, et al. No. 71-1260

Dear Mr. Rodak:
I have been made acquainted with the 

contents of the response which has been, or 
will shortly be, filed by the United States in 
connection with the pending petition for a writ 
of certiorari in the above-captioned matter.

Since we are in agreement with the 
position of the United States, the respondents 
whom I represent (the intervening plaintiffs 
below, Buckley et al.) do not desire to file a 
separate brief in opposition to certiorari.

1A

I

I am taking this opportunity, there
fore, to formally waive our right to separately 
respond; I should appreciate your notifying the 
Court that we join in the position of the United 
•States. Additional copies of this letter are enclosed for your convenience.

Very truly.yours,
V-A

Norman J. Chachkin 
Attorney for Respondents Buckley et al.

cc: Hon. Erwin N. VjX ISWOiQWilliam P. Harvey, Esq. 
Harold E. Hutson, Esq. 
Frank Campbell, Esq.

ii

I O  C O L U M B U S  C I R C L E 5 8 6 - 8 3 9 7 N E W  Y O R K ,  N . Y .  1 0 0 1 9

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Brief in Opposition to Certiorari

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in