Bradley v. Milliken HB No. 4

1-24 of 59

Sort by

Content type	Title	Description
	Brief in Opposition to Certiorari
	Correspondence from Chachkin to Clerk
	Certificate of Service for Brief in Opposition to Certiorari
	Response of Defendant Detroit Board of Education to Petition for Writ of Certiorari Filed by William Milliken and Frank J. Kelley
	Certificate of Service to Response of Defendant Detroit Board of Education to Petition for Writ of Certiorari
	Correspondence from Chackin to Clerk
	Brief in Opposition to Certiorari
	Defendants Response in Opposition to Motion for Intervention as Party Plaintiff Filed on Behalf of Organization of School Administrators and Supervisors	Includes Correspondence from Kelley to Clerk. Response of State Defendants in Opposition to Motion for Intervention as Party Plaintiff Filed on Behalf of Organization of School Administrators and Supervisors.
	State Defendants' Brief in Opposition to Motion for Intervention as Party Plaintiff Filed by Organization of School Administrators and Supervisors
	Correspondence from Clerk to Chachkin
	Correspondence from Clerk to Derengoski
	Correspondence from Nelson (West Publishing Company) to Caldwell
	Correspondence from Kelley and Derengoski to Clerk
	Memo from Bailey to Counsel Re: Detroit Files
	Correspondence from Chachkin to Clerk Re: Milliken v. Bradley
	Correspondence from Chachkin to Clerk Re: The School Town of Speedway, IN v. Dillin
	Supreme Court Notice of Appeal
	Correspondence from Caldwell to West Publishing Company Editorial Dept
	Answer of Defendants to Application for Leave to Intervene and Motion to Defer Further Proceedings Made by The United States	Answer of Defendant Detroit Board of Education and Other Defendants to Application for Leave to Intervene and Motion to Defer Further Proceedings Made by The United States of America
	Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Government's Motion to Intervene
	Plaintiffs' Statement in Opposition to Government's Motion to Intervene Under Section 902	Date is approximate.
	Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Intervene from Hood to Judge Roth
	Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Support of Ruling on Desegregation Area and Development of Plan
	Proposed Order for Preparing Metropolitan Desegregation Plans