Bradley v. Milliken HB No. 4

1-24 of 47

Content type	Title	Description
	Affidavit of Harold B. Wagner
	Answer in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion Requiring Defendants to Cooperate and Pay for a Desegregation Plan Prepared by Plaintiffs
	Answer of Defendants to Application for Leave to Intervene and Motion to Defer Further Proceedings Made by The United States
	Application for Waiver of Ten Day Motion Response Period; Affidavit of Rosenberg; Memorandum in Support of Motion to Defer Further Proceedings
	Brief in Opposition to Certiorari
	Brief in Opposition to Certiorari
	Brief of Defendants in Support of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the Board's Detroit Plan
	Brief on Law in Support of Metropolitan Plan Presented by Detroit School Board and Other Defendants
	Certificate of Service for Brief in Opposition to Certiorari
	Certificate of Service to Response of Defendant Detroit Board of Education to Petition for Writ of Certiorari
	Correspondence from Chachkin to Clerk
	Correspondence from Chachkin to Clerk Re: Milliken v. Bradley
	Correspondence from Chachkin to Clerk Re: The School Town of Speedway, IN v. Dillin
	Correspondence from Chachkin to Judge Roth
	Correspondence from Chackin to Clerk
	Correspondence from Clerk to Chachkin
	Correspondence from Clerk to Derengoski
	Correspondence from Kelley and Derengoski to Clerk
	Correspondence from Kelley to Clerk
	Defendant Detroit Board of Education Exhibits in Reference to Desegregation Plan
	Defendant's Answer to Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Adjudging Defendant's Detroit Plans to be Legally Insufficient and for Other Relief
	Defendants Propose Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Following Hearings on Detroit-Only Remedy
	Defendants Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Following Hearings on Metropolitan Detroit Desegregation Plans
	Defendants Response in Opposition to Motion for Intervention as Party Plaintiff Filed on Behalf of Organization of School Administrators and Supervisors