1-24 of 47

Content type Title Description
Defendants Response in Opposition to Motion for Intervention as Party Plaintiff Filed on Behalf of Organization of School Administrators and Supervisors Includes Correspondence from Kelley to Clerk. Response of State Defendants in Opposition to Motion for Intervention as Party Plaintiff Filed on Behalf of Organization of School Administrators and Supervisors.
Correspondence from Chachkin to Clerk Re: The School Town of Speedway, IN v. Dillin
Defendants Propose Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Following Hearings on Detroit-Only Remedy Includes Correspondence from Roumell to Judge Roth.
Correspondence from Clerk to Chachkin
Defendant's Answer to Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Adjudging Defendant's Detroit Plans to be Legally Insufficient and for Other Relief Defendant Board of Education for the City of Detroit Answer to Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Adjudging Defendant's Detroit Plans to be Legally Insufficient and for Other Relief
Correspondence from Kelley to Clerk
Response of Defendant Detroit Board of Education to Petition for Writ of Certiorari Filed by William Milliken and Frank J. Kelley
Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Intervene from Hood to Judge Roth
Ruling on Propriety of Considering a Metropolitan Remedy to Accomplish Desegregation of Detroit Public Schools
Objections of Defendants to the Plan Submitted by Michigan State and By Way of an Alternative, A Submission Herein by Said Board of a Detroit Integration Plan Objections of Board of Education for the City of Detroit and Other Defendants to the Metropolitan Plan Submitted by the State of Michigan and By Way of an Alternative, A Submission Herein by Said Board of a Metropolitan Detroit Area Integration Plan
Memorandum in Support of Motion to Defer Further Proceedings Date is approximate.
Brief on Law in Support of Metropolitan Plan Presented by Detroit School Board and Other Defendants
Notice of Hearing
Plaintiffs' Statement in Opposition to Government's Motion to Intervene Under Section 902 Date is approximate.
Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Government's Motion to Intervene
Answer of Defendants to Application for Leave to Intervene and Motion to Defer Further Proceedings Made by The United States Answer of Defendant Detroit Board of Education and Other Defendants to Application for Leave to Intervene and Motion to Defer Further Proceedings Made by The United States of America
Brief in Opposition to Certiorari
Defendants Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Following Hearings on Metropolitan Detroit Desegregation Plans
Order Requiring Defendants to Make a Survey and Evaluation of Existing School Transportation Facilities Order Requiring Defendants State Board of Education and State Superintendent of Public Instruction to Make a Survey and Evaluation of Existing School Transportation Facilities
Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Support of Motion for Order Adjudging Defendant's Detroit Plans to be Legally Insufficient Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Support of Motion for Order Adjudging Defendant's Detroit Plans to be Legally Insufficient and for Other Relief
Notice of Hearing; Proof of Service Includes Correspondence from Guy to All Counsel
Memorandum in Support of Motion to Intervene Date is approximate.
Defendants' Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion Requiring Defendants to Cooperate and Pay for a Desegregation Plan Prepared by Plaintiffs State Defendants' Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for an Order Requiring State Defendants to Cooperate Fully and Openly and for State Defendants to Pay for the Reasonable Costs of a Plan of Metropolitan Desegregation Prepared by Plaintiffs
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for an Order Requiring Defendants to Cooperate and Pay Reasonable Costs of Plaintiffs' Desegregation Plan Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for an Order Requiring State Defendants to Cooperate Fully and Openly and for State Defendants to Pay for the Reasonable Costs of a Plan of Metropolitan Desegregation Prepared by Plaintiffs
Return to top