Proposed Order for Preparing Metropolitan Desegregation Plans
Working File
January 1, 1972
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Proposed Order for Preparing Metropolitan Desegregation Plans, 1972. 485e69f4-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/deec39cf-aba7-44f3-b083-b77df489bb1f/proposed-order-for-preparing-metropolitan-desegregation-plans. Accessed November 01, 2025.
Copied!
j;
1
••
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
)
RONALD BRADLEY, et al, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
v. )
)
WILLIAM G. MILLIKEN, et al, )
)
Defendants, )
and )
)
DETROIT FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, LOCAL )
231, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, )
AFL-CIO, )
)
Defendant-Intervenor, )
and )
)
DENISE MAGDOWSKI, et al, )
)
Defendants-Intervenors, )
et al )
_______________________________________ )
' . . ■ f
i
I
!
.■ j
i
i
j
i
Civil Action
No. 35257 f
i
!■ •* i
ORDER
FOR PREPARING METROPOLITAN DESEGREGATION PLANS
At a session of the United States
District Court for the Eastern
District of Michigan,held on the
____ day of ________ , 1972, in the
United States Federal Building,
Detroit, Michigan.
PRESENT: Stephen J. Roth
United States Judge
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
j
1. The Defendant State Board of Education, in cooperation
j!and consultation with the various affected local school districts i
__ jis hereby ordered to prepare a pupil assignment plan for all
students within the Detroit metropolitan school community.
2. Said plan shall provide for school attendance within
the following school "clusters:
No. 1
No. 2
No. 3
No. 4
No. 5
No. 6
No. 7
No. 8
Detroit Murray
Melvindale
Lincoln Park
Allen Park
Southgate
Detroit Southwestern
River Rouge
Wyandotte
Riverview
Trenton
Grosse lie
No . 9 Detroit Mumford
Detroit Ford
Bloomfield Hills
West Bloomfield
Walled Lake
Avondale
No.10 Detroit Northern
Highland Park
Hazel Park
Royal Oak
Birmingham
Detroit Western
Van Buren
Ecorse
Taylor
Woodhaven
Romulus
Huron
Gibralter
Flat Rock
Detroit Chadsey
Westwood
Inkster
Wayne
Cherry Hill
Detroit Nprthwestern
Crestwood
Dearborn
Dearborn Heights
Fairlane
Garden City
North Dearborn Heights
Detroit Mackenzie
Detroit Cody
Northville
Plymouth
Livonia
Redford Union
South Redford
Detroit Central
Ferndale
Oak Park
Berkley
Southfield
Detroit Cooley
Detroit Redford
Clarenceville
Farmington
Novi
No.11 Detroit Pershing
Hamtramck
Madison Heights
Lamphere
Clawson
Troy
No.12 Pontiac
Holly
Brandon
Waterford
Lake Orion
Oxford
Rochester
Clarkston
Huron Valley
South Lyon
No.13 Detroit Kettering
Utica
Warren
No.14 Detroit Northeastern
Detroit Osborn
Van Dyke
Warren Woods
Centerline
Fitzgerald
No.15 Detroit King
Grosse Pointe
Harper Woods
East Detroit
No. 16 Detroit Southeastern
Lake Shore
Lakeview
Roseville
South Lake
No. 17 Detroit Finney
Detroit Denby
Chippewa Valley
Fraser
Clintondale
- 2-
No. 18 Mt. Clemens
Anchor Bay
Richmond
Romeo
L'Anse Creuse
Armada
New Haven
3. Within each cluster, the racial proportions in each
school shall be so reflective of the racial proportion of the
cluster as to render all the schools in the cluster non-racially
identifiable. No strict racial quota shall be required, but any
substantial deviation from the norm must be justified by compelling
reasons of public convenience and necessity.
4. The Defendant State Board of Education shall present
! .
jthis pupil assignment plan to the Court on a date to be set by
this Court, along with a report as to a feasible date or dates
for implementing the plan as to all grades or as to specific
grades.in stages.
5. Said report shall also include a statement of steps
I •
to be taken to preserve desegregation in each cluster, including,
but not necessarily limited to, the following topics:
(a) Curriculum appropriate for multi
racial student bodies;
(b) Avoidance of intra-school segre
gation caused by "tracking," testing,
; grouping or similar devices;
(c) Provisions for student transportation;
(d) Provision of administrative staff,
counselling staff and faculty appro
priate to a multi-racial student body;
(e) Provision for inclusion of all students
and their parents in the life of the
school.
(f) Provision of in-service training to
prepare teachers for multi-racial teaching
situations.
- 3-
6. All parties and any school district affected shall
be given the opportunity to respond to this plan and report as to 1
its practicalities within a time set by the Court and the Court jj
l| will hola a hearing subsequent to the filing of such* responses
| .I as to the plan's practicalities.!(ii
j tI
United States Judge
!
:
- 4-