Correspondence from Kelley and Derengoski to Clerk
Public Court Documents
June 2, 1972
1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Correspondence from Kelley and Derengoski to Clerk, 1972. efa9cae7-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f9012dec-fdba-4e5e-8898-b3e805ae551f/correspondence-from-kelley-and-derengoski-to-clerk. Accessed April 22, 2025.
Copied!
STATE OF MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERA
L eon S. C ohan
Deputy Attorney General
F R A N K J. KELLEY
A T T O R N E Y G E N E R A L
LANSING
4 8 9 1 3
June 2, 1972
Hon. M ichael Rodak, J r . , C lerk
United S ta tes Supreme Court
Washington, D. C. 20543
Re: M i l l ik e n , e t a l v B rad ley , e t a l
No. 71-1468
P e t i t io n e r s in the above captioned cause are
compelled to oppose the request f o r an ex tens ion o f time
sought by the o r i g in a l p la in t i f f s - r e s p o n d e n ts here in
because the reasons advanced in support o f the requested
de lay are w ithou t m er it .
The o r i g in a l p la in t i f f s - r e s p o n d e n ts have con
s i s t e n t l y opposed a p p e l la te rev iew o f the t r i a l c o u r t 's
f in d in g o f ae ju re s e g re g a t io n . In th is regard , counsel
f o r these p a r t ie s have a lready thorough ly b r i e f e d the
questions a t issue in the S ix th C i r c u i t Court o f Appeals.
In l i g h t o f th is f a c t , the t h i r t y day p e r io d f ix e d by the
ru les f o r f i l i n g t h e i r b r i e f in th is im portant case is
c l e a r l y ample time.
W ill iam M. Saxton, Esq.
Robert J. Lord, Esq.
Theodore Sachs, Esq.
Norman J. Chachkin
A lexander B. R i t c h ie , Esq.
Richard P. C ond it, Esq.
Kenneth B. McConnell, Esq.
George T. Roumell, Jr.
Dear Mr. Rodak:
Very t r u ly yours
cc: Douglas H. West, Esq.
Robert B. Webster, Esq