Answer of Defendants to Application for Leave to Intervene and Motion to Defer Further Proceedings Made by The United States
Public Court Documents
May 9, 1972
1 page
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Answer of Defendants to Application for Leave to Intervene and Motion to Defer Further Proceedings Made by The United States, 1972. 1286ebed-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7e71bf1d-df0a-4100-b6c2-d93804bc3675/answer-of-defendants-to-application-for-leave-to-intervene-and-motion-to-defer-further-proceedings-made-by-the-united-states. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
#
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
RONALD BRADLEY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
WILLIAM G. MILLIKEN, et al.,
Defendants,
DETROIT FEDERATION OF TEACHERS LOCAL
231, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS,
AFL-CIO,
Civil Action
No. 35257
and
Defendant-Intervenor,
DENISE MAGDOWSKI, et al.,
Defendants-Intervenors,
et al.
ANSWER
OF DEFENDANT DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION AND
OTHER DEFENDANTS TO APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE
AND MOTION TO DEFER FURTHER PROCEEDINGS MADE BY THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
i
NOW COMES the Defendant School Board for the City of
Detroit, and other Defendants, and in answer to the Application
For Leave to Intervene by the United States of America and the
Motion to Defer Further Proceedings made by the United States of
America, the said Defendant takes no position, except to state that
if the United States of America is permitted to intervene, it
should intervene for all purposes, including the purpose of being
subject to counter-claims on behalf of the Plaintiffs or Defendant^,
as the case may be, for any monies expended as the result of any
remedial orders that may be issued by the Court.
Respectfully submitted,
RILEY AND ROUMELL
And;
Date: May 9, 1972,
Louis D. Beer v
720 Ford Building
Detroit, Michigan 48226
Telephone: 962-8255
Attorneys for Defendant Detroit
Board of Education