Correspondence from Chachkin to Clerk Re: Milliken v. Bradley
Public Court Documents
May 31, 1972
2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Correspondence from Chachkin to Clerk Re: Milliken v. Bradley, 1972. 14aacae7-52e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3239e76c-e34d-49fb-b206-45ee98d4497d/correspondence-from-chachkin-to-clerk-re-milliken-v-bradley. Accessed December 05, 2025.
Copied!
May 31, 1972
Hon. Michael Rodak, Jr., Clerk
United States Supreme Court
Washington, D. C. 20543
Dear Mr. Rodak:
Re: Milliken, etal. v . Bradley, et al.
No. 71-1468
I am one of the attorneys for the original plaintiffs-
respondents in the above-captioned matter (those parties
designated as respondents on the cover of the petition
from Ronald Bradley to and including the Detroit Branch
of the NAACP). f .
On behalf of these respondents, I find it necessary to L~"
respectfully request an extension of one week within_
which to complete preparation and printing of our brief
in opposition to the petition for certiorari.
Much of the time of counsel for respondents in this
matter was devoted recently to the completion of an ~~
extensive hearing in the trial court between March 28 and
April 14, 1972, preparation of exhaustive proposed find
ings of fact and conclusions of law which were filed with
the trial court in early May, and submission of briefs
and argument at a hearing on or about May 9, 1972 con- -
cerning a motion of the United States of America seeking
to intervene in this litigation. These matters as well
as the extensive involvement of all counsel for these
respondents in litigation to protect the constitutional
rights of black school children, including many cases
before this Court, have prevented us from being in a
position to respond, as we would have liked, within the
normal time fixed by the rules.
Counsel for respondents are located in four different
cities and the necessities of consultation before a
draft can be sent to the printer, combined with these
| O C O L U M B U S C I R C L E 5 8 6 - 8 3 9 7 N E W Y O R K , N . Y . 1 0 0 19
Hon. Michael Rodak, Jr. - 2- May 31, 1972
other circumstances, impel us to request an extension
of one week within which to respond.
NJC:nm
cc Douglas H. West, Esq.
Robert B. Webster, Esq.
William M. Saxton, Esq.
Robert J. Lord, Esq.
Eugene Krasicky, Esq.
Theodore Sachs, Esq.
Alexander B. Ritchie, Esq.
Richard P. Condit, Esq.
Kenneth B. McConnell, Esq.
George T. Roumell, Jr., Esq.
Very truly yours-,-
Norman J. Chachkin
I O C O L U M B U S C I R C L E 5 8 6-8 3 9 7 N E W Y O R K , N . Y . 1 0 0 1 9