Newspaper clippings (Jan/Feb 1984)
Press
February 2, 1984

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Correspondence from Whelan to Tegeler Re: Deposition Schedule, 1992. c5e98cfc-a146-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/fcc8c34b-b16e-4f1a-95e9-4d8e4baeed55/correspondence-from-whelan-to-tegeler-re-deposition-schedule. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
>. 3 : en MacKenzie Hall RICITARDY Bi UMENTIIAL 110 Sh RS ly TTOR EY GENERA SIernan eel SRN UREA Hartford. CT 06105 FAX (203) 5323-35336 Office of The Attorney General A Pel: 566-7173 State of Connecticut July 2.,°1992 Philip D. Tegeler, Esq. Connecticut Civil Liberties Union 32 Grand Street Hartford, Connecticut 06106 RE: Sheff v. O'Neill Dear Phil: Thank you. for your letter of June 26, 1992. The deposition schedule which you set out in that letter is consistent with my records. A couple of points need to be in regard to the schedule. First, July 30 has been set aside for the deposition of an as yet undisclosed plaintiff witness. It is highly unlikely that we will be able to prepare to take the deposition of an unknown expert witness in the short amount of time that is left between now and July 30. A final decision regarding whether we can proceed on June 30th will be made after the plaintiffs' provide the necessary disclosure regarding this witness. Second, you will recall that we have issued a notice of deposition and a deposition subpoena for Marvin Dawkins. To date you have not suggested any alternative dates for Mr. Dawkins' deposition. We continue to await your response in this regard. Finally, in regard to your reguest for further information regarding the state employees who we have listed as potential witnesses, you should know that they we expect to revise our disclosure as decisions are made as to who we will call and for what purposes. At the moment we are considering deleting Forgione, Conjero, and Behuniak since their testimony is likely to be duplicative. In regard to Williams, Brewer, Prowda, Rindone, Sergi, Breene and Downs our description of their testimony will be updated but, at the moment, it is as complete as it can be. As I have explained to you, these individuals are not what one would normally think of as expert witnesses. The testimony they will present will not be based on facts or opinions “Macguired iin anticipation of litigation or for trial”. They will testify regarding facts known to them by reason of their employment and as such they are fact witnesses rather than Philip Tegeler, Esq. July 1,:-1992 Page 2 expert witnesses. We have disclosed their names pursuant to the outstanding order only because that order requires us to go beyond disclosing our experts. We do not expect these individuals to offer their personal opinions during their testimony, but simply convey to the court the information they have which we think is relevant to the issues before the court. For these reasons you need to understand that our disclosure in regard to these individuals will be different than our disclosure in regard to our expert witnesses. The descriptions which we have provided you to date identify the specific areas within the personal knowledge of these individuals which we may cover during their testimony. These disclosures should help you focus your deposition, but the disclosures do not limit the scope of your deposition nor do they limit the extent to which we may ask these people to convey their personal knowledge to the court at trial, We will, of course, update the description of the testimony of these individuals as we discover new areas we wish to cover with them and as we make final decisions as to who is the best person in DOE or DOH to convey certain information to the court. You can be sure that our decision making process in this regard will continue up to and even through the date that trial begins. Very truly yours, RICHARD BLUMENTHAL / ATTORNEY ZEJERNL 7 7 7 74 /4 ; HA ~~ { (LA / Fi 4 John R% Whelan A N » Asgistant Attorney General / i JRW: sad / CC: All Counsel of Record / State of Connecticut ATTORNEY GENERAL MacKENZIE HALL 110 SHERMAN STREET HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06105 Julius L. Chambers Esq Marianne Lado Esq Ronald Ellis Esg NAACP Legal Defense Fund & Ed. Fund 99 Hudson Street New York NY 10013 miinimmiminmaimarunnnnm