Correspondence from Guinier to Finance; Invoice from Hamilton Graphics; Correspondence from Richardson to Bush; Receipt; Correspondence from Stevas to Leonard

Correspondence
April 19, 1985 - May 23, 1985

Cite this item

Correspondence from Guinier to Finance; Invoice from Hamilton Graphics; Correspondence from Richardson to Bush; Receipt; Correspondence from Stevas to Leonard preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorney
- Leslie J. Winner
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- f5ebd86b-dd92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Correspondence from Guinier to Finance; Invoice from Hamilton Graphics; Correspondence from Richardson to Bush; Receipt; Correspondence from Stevas to Leonard, 1985. f5ebd86b-dd92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/1ea01531-6d7e-4dc2-9011-d3cb38d627fa/correspondence-from-guinier-to-finance-invoice-from-hamilton-graphics-correspondence-from-richardson-to-bush-receipt-correspondence-from-stevas-to-leonard. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    ,l?n^o /** /? 351 -f,
Lani Guinier

May 9, 1985

To: Finance

Re: Gingles v. Edmisten,
No. 0834-01

Account No. 01-7171
Legal Briefs

/r* /r,,-,-"/



ro: NAACP Legal Defense Pund
99 Hudscn Street
New York, New York 10013

Att: Lani Guinier, Esq.

Per coPy

INVOICE

T: offsetqing 3q coPies to SuP-
plemental Brief for Appellee:

21 pages at $3.55 per page $ 76.65

DArE April 19, 1985
JoB No. 456

rNVorcE No. 448

RE: Lacy H. Thornburg, et al, v,
Ralph Gingles, et aI.

62.O0Covers
30 extra copies at .10C per page
per copy 63.00

15 extra copies at .8+ per page
per eopy 25.20

30 extna covers at .81+ per cover 24.30
15 extra eovers at .78Q per cover 11.70
Perfeet Binding--75 copies at $f.OO

75,00ffi

HBi
HAMILTON GBAPHICS, INC.

200 Hudson Street, New York, NY 10013 . l212lxi6-4177



NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.
g9 Hudson Street, New York, N.Y. 10013o (212) 219-1900

lIay 23, 1985

Ivlr. Jo B. Bush, CVR
P. O. Box 28163
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

RE: Ralph Gingles v. Rufus Edmisten, €t aI.

Dear Mr. Bush:

Enclosed please find check in amount of
$72.75 which covers cost of the attached
Inovice No. 85-025.

Very truly yours,
//. 1

fJ*,- ltL; 7-1/Luav^,2
Ar^"" Richardson'secretary to Lani Guinier, Esq.

Enclosure #1

Conlribulions are deduetible /or I-l.S. inutne lar purposes

The NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIoNAL FUND is not part ol the National Association lor the Advancemenl ol Colored People although it
was lounrted by it and shares its commilment to equal righls. LDF has had lor over 25 years a separate Board, program, stall, ollice and budget.



(

JO B. BUSH, CVR

P. O. BoX 28t6t
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA

4/28/85

27 6tt

INVOICE NO.DATE :

SOLD TO: LANI GUINIER, ESQUIRE
99 HUDSON STREET
I6TH FLOOR

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10011

DOCKET NUMBER

CASE NAME RALPH GINGLES V. RUF MI STEN

DATE OF CASE 10/14/8'
CITY 0F CASE RALEIG;I---I{--C-

R5-0?5

, ..-.

.D. NO.56-1387803

PAGE NUMBER

ilArr PAGE S

SKIPPED NOS

NET PAGES

M I SCELLANEOUS

POSTAGE

To GUINI ER

_1TO

@ $ t.oo

(EXPRESS MAIL)ON

EXPEDITED X REGULAR

6r.00

2l

27

FoR 5 9.75
FOR S-

9.75
TO

TO

ON

oN_FOR 5

TOTAL DUE

THANK YOU.

72.75

(

paipreHr DUE UPON RECEIPT



T
UPRs EME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

OFFICE OF THE CLERK
WASHTNGTON. D. C. 20543

Direct Dial Number
(202) 479-301 4

M. .is 1gB5

Jerris Leonard, Esquire
Leonard and McGuan, P. C.
Suite 1020
The Farragut Buildlng
900 17Lh Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20006

Re: 83- 1 968 Laey H. Thornbury, et al . v .
Ralph Gingles, et aI .

Dear Mr. Leonard:

Your request of May 17,1985, for an extension of timeto file the appellants'brief on the merits in the above
stated case has been granted, and the time has been extendedto and includlng July 8, t 985.

Inasmuch as this case will more than 1ike1y becalendared for orar argument in 0ctober or Ncvember, no
further extensions of time will be granted to fil r appellants'
brief on the merits as this would delay progress of the casesince the court prefers to have the briefs well ir. advance ofthe arguments.

Very truly yours,

ALEXANDER L. STEVAS, CLERK

1tA.0^44J
Sandy NeI sen
Assistant CIerk

cc: CaroI Lani Guinier, Esq.
Robert Neal Hunter, Jr. , Esq.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Guinier to Finance; Invoice from Hamilton Graphics; Correspondence from Richardson to Bush; Receipt; Correspondence from Stevas to Leonard

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorney

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in