Brief of Amicus Curiae the Washington Legal Foundation in Support of Appellants

Public Court Documents
July 5, 1985

Cite this item
Brief of Amicus Curiae the Washington Legal Foundation in Support of Appellants preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Attorney Notes on Vernon Malone 1, 1983. 573d2f57-df92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/58e8eadd-7910-4f61-b319-8c7d89c71403/attorney-notes-on-vernon-malone-1. Accessed April 06, 2025.

    Copied!

    GILBERT F. GANUCHEAU 
CLERK 

WWI $tates Court of Meals 
FIFTH CIRCUIT 

OFFICE OF THE CLERK 

September 1, 1987 

Mr. Kendall L. Vick 
Assistant Attorney General 
Louisiana Department of Justice 
234 Loyola Avenue, 7th Floor 
New Orleans, LA 70112 

No. 87-3463 - Chisom, Et Al. v. Edwards, Et Al. 

Dear Mr. Vick: 

—PULexA.A._ 

_ 

kl CLAsavw 

TEL, 504-589-6514 
600 CAMP STREET 

NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130 

Pursuant to your motion a further 20 day extension 
until September 21, 1987 has been granted for the filing of 
the appellees' brief. The Court will expect the brief to 
be filed by this new due date without your requesting any 
further time. 

GFG/jmg 
cc: Mr. William P. Quigley 

Mr. Mark L. Gross 
Ms. Pamela S. Karlan 

y yours, Very 

Gilbert F. Ganucheau 
Clerk 



• 

egal 
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 

efense und 99 Hudson Street, New York, N.Y. 10013 • (212) 219-1900 

September 1, 1987 

Hon. Gilbert Ganucheau 
Clerk 
United States Court of Appeals 
for the Fifth Circuit 
600 Camp Street 
New Orleans, LA 70130 

Re: No. 87-3463, Chisom v. Edwards  

Dear Mr. Ganucheau: 

I am writing with regard to appellees' motion for 
extension of time within which to file their brief. As 
I told your office on the telephone today, appellants 
do not oppose this motion. 

We note, however, that the motion is open-ended 
with regard to the amount of time requested. In 
determining the appropriate extension, we ask that the 
Court keep in mind the fact that appellees have already 
received an extension of nearly one month and the 
nature of this case, which challenges an electoral 
scheme which is scheduled to be used in 1988. We also 
ask that the Court make clear that it will not 
entertain any further requests by appellees for 
extension of time. 

cc: Kendall L. Vick, Esq. 
William P. Quigley, Esq. 
Ron Wilson, Esq. 
Roy J. Rodney, Esq. 
Mark Gross, Esq. 

ectfully, 

61101,4* 
Pamela S. Karlan 
Counsel for Appellants 

Ccmtributions are deductible for U.S. income tax purposes. 

The NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) is not part of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) although 
LDF was founded by the NAACP and shares its commitment to equal rights. LDF has had for over 30 years a separate Board, program, staff, office and budget.

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top