Correspondence from Edmisten to Leonard; Pugh v. Hunt Motion for Extension of Time; Order

Public Court Documents
February 5, 1982

Cite this item

Correspondence from Edmisten to Leonard; Pugh v. Hunt Motion for Extension of Time; Order preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 5f353bc1-d792-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Correspondence from Edmisten to Leonard; Pugh v. Hunt Motion for Extension of Time; Order, 1982. 5f353bc1-d792-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/24c20f66-1b2a-4c58-8e60-e3ee9b315e57/correspondence-from-edmisten-to-leonard-pugh-v-hunt-motion-for-extension-of-time-order. Accessed November 01, 2025.

Copied!

RUFUS L. EDMTSTEN
ATTORNEY GTEXENAL

JWJR,/dm

Enclosures

:4
ames W=1Iace, Jr"

uty Attorney General
for Legal Affairs

St*e of Fo*h CIurolitra
prpurlmnrl of Sluslicc

P. O. Box 629
RALEIGH
27602

February 5, l9B2

Honorable J. Rich Leonard, Clerk
United States District Court
Eastern Dlstrict
Fcderal Building
RaIeigh, North Carolina 276t1

RE: AIan V. Pugh, etc., et aI. v James B.

Dear Mr. Leonard:

Hunt , Jr. , etc. , €t aI.

. Enclosed please find four copies of a Motion for Extension ofTime and Proposed order in the above-captioned case. would youplease file the same return a copy stamped,'Fil_ed" to me in irreenclosed self-addressed envelope.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Very truly yours,

RUFUS L. EDM]STEN
ATTORNEY GENERAL

rN THE UN]TED STATES DTSTRTCT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRTCT OF NORTII CAROLINA

RALEIGH DTVISION

crvrl No. 81-1065-crv-5
ALAN V. PUGH, etc., et dl.,

Plainti ffs ,

JAMES B. HIJNT, JR., ctc., et df .,
Dcfendants.

MOTTON FOR NXTENSION OF TI'I{E

This court, oD January 18, 1982, having directed corlnsel in
the above-captioned matter to confer and submit to the clerk
within twenty days of the date of said order a stipulati on con-
cerning ti're amount of time required for discovery in thr: case,

and the defcndants having fi1ed, oD January 29 , 19g2, a Motion
to Consolidate the above-captioned action with the case of Gj-ngles, etc.
et aI. v Edmisten, etc., et a1., Civil No. B1-803-Crv-5, the defendants

hereby respectfully move the Court that they be given ar) extension
of time to respond to the Court's Discovery Order of January f8,
I9B2 to a date ten days follorving the Courtrs determinal Lon on

defenants' Motion to Consolidate the cases.

Respectfully submitted rhis the { uuo of Fehruary , tglz.

RUPUS L. EDMISTEN
ATTORNEY GENERAL

/;
Jarn'es lWal-Iace", lr. -hDg5-tutt' Attorney Grderal
ttod Legal Affairs

Carolina Department
Post Office Box 629
Ra1eigh, North Carolina z
Telephone: (9I9) 733-3377

Norma IIarrell
Tiare Smiley
Assistant Attorneys General

John Lassiter
Associate Attorney Gener.al

Attorneys for Defendants

of Justice
7 602

o
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

rOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
RALEIGH DTVISION

ALAN V. PUGH, etc., et i1., ) CML NO. 81-803-CIV-5
)

Plainti ffs ,

JAMES B. HUNT, JR., etc., €t dI.,
ORDER

Defendants.

For good cause shown the defendants in the above-entitled
actj-on are hereby granted an extension of time to comply with
this Court's Discovery Order of January 18, 1982, to a date

ten days following this Courtrs determination on the defendants'

Motion to Concolidate this case rrrith the case of qilglgs, et al.
v Edmisten, €t dI., Civil No 81-803-CIV-5.

This the day gf Februdry, 1982.

J. Rich Leonard
United States District Court

Deputy Clerk

Of Counsel:

Jerris Leonard &

900 17th Street,
Suite I020
Washington, D. C

Telephone: (202)

-2-

Associates, P. C.
N.W.

. 20006
872-109s

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this dav served the foregoing

I4otion for Extensjon of Time and Proposed Order upon p1a:i ntif f s'

attorncys by placing a copy of samc in the United States post

Office, postage prepaid, addressed to:

This the )

Arthur J. Donaldson
Burke, Donaldson, Holshouser & ferorly
309 North Main Street
Salisbury, North Carolina 28L44

Robert N. Hunter, Jr.
Attorney at Law
Post Office Box 3245
201 West Market Street
Greensboro, North Carolina 27402

J. Levonne Chambers
LesIie Viinner
Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, VlaIlas,

Adkins & Fu11er, P.A.
951 South Independence Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202

Jaclt Greenberg
James Ivl. Irlabrit, III
Napeol-eon B. Ir,illiams , Jr.
10 Columbus CircIe
llew York, New York 10019

day of February , 1982.

,/ ,2"
-,/'

l-/

James WaIlace, Jr

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Edmisten to Leonard; Pugh v. Hunt Motion for Extension of Time; Order

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in