Gingles Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Requests for Admission

Public Court Documents
February 1, 1983

Cite this item

Gingles Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Requests for Admission preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorney
- Leslie J. Winner
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 3c228d08-d492-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Gingles Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Requests for Admission, 1983. 3c228d08-d492-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2ac6e21f-97d1-4616-8bca-9e06b4ea038d/gingles-plaintiffs-response-to-defendants-requests-for-admission. Accessed April 06, 2025.

Copied!

    ,o

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

RALEIGH DIVISION

MLPH GINGLES, et 4I.,
Plaintiffs,

v.

RUFUS L. EDMISTEN, €t al.,
Defendants.

No.81-803-CIV-5

ALAN V. PUGH, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

v.

JAMES B. HUNT, JR., et 41.,
Defendants.

No. 81-1066-CIV-5

JOHN J. CAVANAGH, €t 4L.,
Plaintiffs,

v.

ALEX K. BROCK, et a1.,
Defendants.

and

RALPH GINGLES, €t al.,
Defendant - Intervenor s .

No. 82-545-CIV-5

GINGLES PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS' REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

1. Gingles plaintiffs admit that as of January 1, L982

2 of the 5 members of the North Carolina Board of Election
were black. Gingles plaintiffs specifically deny that 2 out

of the 5 members of the Board were black at any time prior
to the filing of this action.



2. Gingles plaintiffs admit that as of January, 1983

ll members of the House of Representatives and 1 member of

the Senate are black. Plaintiffs specifically deny that there

have ever been as many as L2 black members of the General Assembly

at any time prior to the filing of this action.

3. Gingles plaintiffs admit Request for Admission ll3.

4. Gingles plaintiffs deny that black members in the 1983

North Carolina General Assembly represent every major metropoli-
tan area in North Carolina with significant concentrations of
black voters. Examples of areas not so represented include, but

are not limited to, Wilson and Rocky Mount in the House of
Representatives and Charlotte and Fayetteville in Ehe Senate.

rhis / dayor Zl ,1e83.
I

"11u,!.a- h )r-,,^---
LESLIE J. WINNER
Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Wallas,

Adkins & Fu11er, P.A.
Suite 730 East Independence PLaza
951 South Independence Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
704 / 37 s-846L

JACK GREENBERG
LANI GUINIER
Suite 2030
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019

Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors

-2-



a

a

o

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I have served the foregoing document on all
other parties by placing a copy thereof enclosed in a postage

prepaid properly addressed wrapper in a post office or official
depository under the exclusive care and custody of the United

States Postal Service, addressed to:

Kathleen Heenan
Jerris Leonard & Associates, P.C.
900 lTth Street, N.W.
Suite 1020
Washington, D.C. 20006

Arthur J. Donaldson
Burke, Donaldson, Holshouser & Kenerly
309 N. Main Street
Salisbury, North Carolina 28L54

Robert N. Hunter, Jr.
Attorney at Law
201 W. Market Street
Post Office Box 3245
Greensboro, North Carolina 27402

Wayne T. Elliott
Southeastern Legal Foundation
1800 Century Boulevard, Suite 950
Atlanta, Georgia 30345

Hamilton C. Horton, Jr.
450 NCNB PLaza
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27L0L

James Wa1lace, Jr.'Deputy Attorney General for Legal Affairs
Attorney General's Office
North Carolina Department of Justice
Raleigh, North Caroliaa 27602

This I ary 6 kkual--, , 1983.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Gingles Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Requests for Admission

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorney

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in