Correspondence from Hunter to Stevas
Public Court Documents
August 16, 1984

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Correspondence from Hunter to Stevas, 1984. 901887a2-d592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/302880ba-0292-4309-9dcb-2e415e10c7fe/correspondence-from-hunter-to-stevas. Accessed June 17, 2025.
Copied!
H uxrrn, HoocMex. GnrrNn, Gooot'laN & ATTOIINEYS AT LA\^' sI:ITE 4tO GATE CIT.I- SA\-INGS & LOAN .BITILDING 2OI'I^'EST MARXET STBEET P. O. BO)i 3245 'F,t} -373-c,9,.'4 t glg ) 275't3 4l August 16, 1984 . SA]I-ISBURY OTFICE 3O9 NORTH MAIN STREET SALISBURY, N.C.2Al44 1704\ a37-1300 Doxarosox BOI}ERT N HUNTEN,.JR, EOBETT S-A}\'YE}I IIODGIqA^* NICITAND }d, ONEENE GAEY B GOOD}'IAN ART}IUR J. DONALDSON ' Mr. Alexander L. Stevas Office of the Clerk Supreme Court of the United States Washington, DC 20543 Re: Rufus L. Edmisten, et al. No.83-1968 V. Ralph Gingles, €t aI. Dear Mr. Stevas: I represent Alan V. Pugh, et aI. in the above-captioned action. We had requested the right to file a response to the jurisdictional statement of Rufus Edmisten, et aI. on JuIy 19,1984. This request was granted, giving us until August 17, 1984 to file any response we may have. Our intervenors have elected to not file any response in addition to that filed by Ralph Gingles, and wish to join in their motion to dismiss or affirm and to adopt the same as our position in this matter. We do not wish to file any additional materials at this time. Shou1d the appeflee's motion to dismiss or affirm be denied, we would like to continue to be informed of the status of this case and to submit any briefs which are appropriate. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. N. Hunter, Jr. cc: Jerris Leonard James Wallace 1/]r,an:- Guinier Les1ie Winner yours,