Hardback 6 Inventory Dec 1982 - Jun 1983

Working File
June 24, 1983

Cite this item
Hardback 6 Inventory Dec 1982 - Jun 1983 preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Major v. Treen Deposition of Lani Guinier Errata Sheet, 1984. c706390a-e292-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/29268c04-7cd4-4df6-bec8-74e81e4fb875/major-v-treen-deposition-of-lani-guinier-errata-sheet. Accessed April 06, 2025.

    Copied!

    RE: ltajor v. Treen

Deposition of Lani Guinier, November 29, 1984

Errata Sheet

P. 10 lines 10-12. Put period in proper place; correct
punctuation: because the Justice Departmentts
position in Busbee versus Smith was the same
position as @raintif,f intervenors.
In ltlajor versus Treen, the Justice Departmentrs
posffi as the defendant state.

P. 11 line L7 correct spelling
uncontrovertably

P. 14 lines 4-6. Correct typo
was not enforcing a Section 5. ("9" should be
taken out. )

P. 19 lines 15 and 16
other instances were vigorously investigating
and enforcing Section 5 in c@
intentional discriminatiffiea

P. 15 line 8. correct typo:
But, since it was a Section 5 case, it was a very
different kind of case.

P. 22 line 12, correct spelling: Laughlin ltcDona1d

P. 25 line 12, correct grammer: So the situation in which the
Legal Defense Fund

P. 26 line 16, correct spelling: Gingles versus Edmisten.

P. 26 line 16, correct typo:
reflect specialized effort, to reflect the
experience of the



P. 30 line 14-17 Correct syntax
this case. The fact that the issues were of
first impression since the Voting Rights Act
was passed in June of 1982, and the fact that2
during the time in which vre rdere preparing A
the litigation and during which'the case was
tried, there were no other

P. 31 line 18 Correct typo
the plaintiffs representing the class of black
voters bears (Delete "s". )

P. 33 line 
*ir.!"rr".. 

capitalization of case name

line 15
has been an integral part of all dilution litigation,
and,

-2-

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top