Update on N.C. Reapportionment 1/8/82

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- d8cf94f0-d692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Update on N.C. Reapportionment 1/8/82, 1982. d8cf94f0-d692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/337a7c57-6789-4a50-acd4-b20608d91082/update-on-nc-reapportionment-1882. Accessed December 04, 2025.

Copied!

    UPDATE - N.C. Reapportionment Ll8/82

I. Department of Justice
A. Objected to ConsLitutional Amendment, Senate and

Congressional P1ans.
B. House plan pending - decision must be made by

January 20, L982.

C. Note: It is debatable whether or not the State
constitutional amendment can be applied to the
60 non-$5 counties.

II. Republican Lawsuit
A. It has been removed to the Eastern District of North

Carolina.
B. Answer due soon.
C. North Carolina Attorney General plans to move to

consolidate.

III Legislative
A. Has not scheduled new sessi-on - aPParently House and

Senate can't agree when.

B. Senate plans to redistricE - splitting some countys
but not single member districts.

C. House is fighting to keep its p1an.

D. Apparently the Congressional plan will be done over,
putting durham in Second District.

IV. Gingles v. Edmisten
A. Discovery

t. Deadline FebruarY 19, L982.

2. Motion to Quash denied. No depositions scheduled.
3. No interrogatories or requests to produce scheduled.

B. Class Certification
Motion mostly prepared - Attorney General will tell us
on January 11, whether they will consent. They are con-
cerned about overlapping class of republicans.

C. Motion for Summary Judgment - Possibly ripe for
1. Senate Plan
2. Congress Plan

D. Order thag we be ready for final pretrial conference by
February L9, L982.



UPDATE - Reapporti.onment

-2-

V. Informal Discovery
A. Met with McNeil Smith yielding a few ideas about proving

unresponsiveness .

B. Met with John Brooks.

VI. Computer
A. A11 counties on computer by township.
B. Mecklenburgr Gaston, Guilford, Forsythe, Orange, Cr:mberland,

Wake on computer by enumeraEion district.
C. Sti11 working on Durham, New Hanover, Buncombe.

D. Has Senate plan with 4-5 majority minority districts.
E. Anticipates House plan by January L6, 1982.
F. Program not interactive - much work being done by hand.

VII Historian 
- 

report promised by January 19, 1982.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Update on N.C. Reapportionment 1/8/82

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in