1970 Analysis of Facility Utilization

13 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Impact area
- Education
Topic
- School Desegregation
Matter
- Milliken v. Bradley
Case
- Milliken v. Bradley
U.S. state
- Michigan
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 4261dc9f-54e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0

Cite this item

Case Files, Milliken Working Files. 1970 Analysis of Facility Utilization, 1970. 4261dc9f-54e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/365ea94b-7af2-409d-8ae7-084e2719e5cd/1970-analysis-of-facility-utilization. Accessed November 23, 2025.

Copied!

    1970

SOURCES: CAPACITY-  "O rganization and P ro jected  Enrollm ent-

September, 1970" dated A p ril 10, 1970 

Revised A p ril 2, I 97O

CONSTRUCTION-  Data furn ished by D etro it  Board o f  

Education: "School Data" Books

Enrollment-  Data furn ished  by D e tro it  Board o f

Education (September, 1970 R acia l Count)

SITE SIZE-  "Survey o f  A cq u is it ion , Development and

U t il iz a t io n  o f  R ecently Acquired School 

S ite s  in  R ela tion  To S ite  Standards 

Adopted in  1959" dated August, 1967 

Revised A p r il 2, 1969.

FACILITY UTILIZATION



FACILITY UTILIZATION

SITE SIZE IN WHITE AND BLACK SCHOOLS

9 0 BLACK SCHOOLS

1 . Schools 90$+ Black w ith a v a ilab le  s i t e  s iz e  data * .................... . .  130

2. T ota l acreage o f  sch ools  in  l in e  1 ......................................................... 746.7

3-. Number o f  students in  sch ools  in  l in e  1 .............................................  221,297

4. Average students per acre in  l in e  1 sch ools  ............................ .. 296

90^-f* WHITE SCHOOLS

1 . Schools 90$+  Black w ith a v a ila b le  s i t e  s iz e  data * ......................... 67

2. T ota l acreage o f  sch ools  in  l in e  1 ..................................................... 337.2

3. Number o f  students in  sch ools in  l in e  1 ..............................................  53,544

4 . Average students per acre in  l in e  1 s c h o o l s ......... ....................... .. 65.6

* No s i t e  s iz e  in form ation  was provided f o r  some White and some Black s ch o o ls .

i



1

FACILITY UTILIZATION

SCHOOL TOTAL
■pwnnT.T..,

TOTAL 
i CAPACITY TEMPORARY 

CAP. OR • 0 .DATES OF ADDITION SITE SIZE

ALGER 99.2 528 640 6k
CAP.
_i l

OF CONS.
1 8qR____ 1QPO 1.6  ...

AMOS T * ° 597__ C 3  6 0 8 0
-S t

1895 1908 1.8

ANGELL QO.Q 1282 1120 0 162 — 1916 ___ 1919 1958 1 .9

ANN ARBOR TRAIL n--7_ 625 768 0 -143 1947 1955 5 .6  „

ARTHUR J.H. 2.1 481 480 0 1 1930 1941, 1948 3-7

ATKINSON 100 712 768 64 -56 1928 . 1931 7 .0

BAGLEY 976 1480 1408 192 72 1929 1931, 1?38 T 1949 3.4

BALCH 100 470 ..992 64 -522 1921 4 .4

BARBOURJ.H. 99. 4 1915— 2070 0 -  -155 1920 1959, I 960 3.7

BARTON. 96.3
■

820 568 256 252 1946 3.4

BEARD 0.2 604 608 0 -4 1896 1.2

BEAUBIEN J.H. 99-0 12 68 1330 0 -62 10.0

BELL
;

99. 5 411 672 256 -261 1965 2 .4  '

BELLEVUE 98.4 644 1216 0 -572 .. 1899 1910, 1957 4.1

BENNETT 0.7 1051. .-  1056 64 -5 1911 1930, 1962 1 .7

BERRY 99.8 . 552 1056 512 -504 1892 1957, 1961 3 .8

BIDDLE 1,0Q 471 480 0 -9 2.6

BIRNEY OB.Q 998 .. 8.32 0 166 1963
♦ 5.4

BOW 17.8 99R ... 1056 0 -63 1950 1951. 1959 3 .6

BOYNTON .99.6 1121 __1184 0 -63 1925 ' 1928. 1956. 1958 3.7

BRADY 100 1125 _ 1408 64 -283 1921 1924. 1956. 1961 4 .9

BREITMEYER 1Q0 . 495 720 0 -225 1917 1.2

BROOKS J.H. 1 .5 603 580 0 23 1963 10.0

BUNCHE 99.9 840 1600 0 -760 1902 1956, 1961 3 .8

BURBANK K-9 _ 2^  .. 801 _ 940 0 -139 1931 1944, 1948 4 .0

BURGESS
i

0 .3 368 ...-.576 0 -208 1925 1955 3 .8

BURNS _59«8 1451 1312 192 139
I
i 1924 1 1930 2.6

i
i
i



» ' 
4 2.



3

TOTAL TOTAL TEMPORARY ORIG. DATES OF
$B ENROLL. CAPACITY, CAP..+ OR ' DATE' ADDITIONAL CONS.

COOLIDGE 2.1 1183 1184 0
-  4 x 6 - 1 927 

-1  1925
- 1929, 1938_____________________

1928, 1940, 1951
....13,

4

COOPER 72.1 1678 1728 64 -50 1919 1920 2

CRAFT 86.8 493 576 0 -83 1901 1957 ■ 1 1

CRARY 20.6 921 960 0 -39  1937 1939, 19^9, 1955 1 3

CROSSMAN 99.5 1097 1344 64 -247 1911 1920, 1951, 1959 2

COURTIS 98.1 1489 1376 128 113 5

COURVILLE 98.4 1585 1696 0 -111  1922 1926, 1930 5

CUSTER 99.8 1507 1568 0 -61 1920 1924 5
l o w ~ z W ~

COUZENS 97.5 680 crz3 0 CT3-1956 2

DAVISON 96.9  1373 1472 0 -99  1919 1920 5

DENBY S.H. 2.5 2949/< 2480 60 469 1929 1930, 1938 17

DIXON 1.5 816
928 -

0
±113.
C D  1930 1947, 1956 3

DOTY 98.1 730 912 0 -182 1908 1921, 1959, 1962 1

DOSSIN 5.0 576 576 0 0 1950 1954 5

DOW 1.3 628 736 0 -108 1952 1957 4

DREW J.H.
. . . ' . 

95-0 1587 1810 0 -223 14.

DUFFIELD 93.8 787 1472 0 -685 1924 f 4.

DURFEE J.H. 100 1496 1810 0 -314 1926 1927, 1929 13.

DWYER 99.6 845 1088' 64 -343 1913 1919 •

EARHART J.H. 8.6 l l l l 990 0 121 1908 4.

EDISON 2.7 659 640 0 19 1921 1930, 1952 4.

EDMONSON 79.5 1278 2176 0 -898 . j 9.

EDMONDSON ANNFV- 8 1 .4  269 352 0 -83
ELLIS —71 .6  756 840 0 -84 1915 1919, 1959 • 2.

EMERSON K-9
1

—3.6
.

LR72 1420 0
.

-48  1949 1950, 1953 5.
ESTABROOK .,.,.99.0

'
EOQ -  656 0 -347 1891 1921 8.

EVERRET - 0 l—302___
35-a-

A Q -------1949 — 195.6_________________________ - 2.



TOTAL
<£r ENROLL

TOTAL TEMPORARY 
. CAPACITY CAPTOR

ORIG.
DATE

DATES OF 
ADDITIONAL CONS.

‘SITE
. *.... .SIZE --

FAIRBANKS i„ 93,3._ J iia $08 0
CAP. 

- 1051 .. 1 OKS 2.1

FARWELL J.H. 67.8 566 1352 381+ -786 9-5

FERRY & ANNEX 66.6 115*+ 1392 320 -238 1923 1951, 1959 1 .9

FIELD 90.1 680 1760
1
1120 -801 1887 I 89I+, 1907, 1921 3 .2

FIELD ANNEX -9 0 .8 279 W /Field 1.0

FINNEY S.H. 86.6 2658 2160 0 1+98 1929 1930, 19^9 19.3

FISHER 100 . 197 282 61+ -35 1950 1958 9 .9

FITZGERALD 98.9  1854 2112 X 382 -258 1926 1927, 1930 2. 1+

FLEMING 0.2 -.658 672 0 -19 1962 12 .9

FOCH J.H. 95.1+ 161+0 1650 0 -10 1921+ 1959 5.1+

FORD K-9 85.1+ .781 81+0 0 -109 I 925 191+1, 1952 3 .9

FORD S.H. 20.0 3082. ..2550 0 . 5 3 2 _ 1957 1962 23.1

FOSTER 100 58 6 1088
i

0 -502 1957 3.5

FOX 0 187 • 160 0 -23 1962 1.2

FRANKLIN 17.6  1061
J5 6 2

0
son

1899 1921, I 960 3 .0

GARDNER 0.2 611 51+1+ 0 67 Annx. 1926, 1950, 1957 3 .0

GEORGE 100 271 672 0 - 1+01 1957 1958 1.5

GLAZER 100 783 832 0 -79 * 3.1+

GOLDBERG 97.2 896 1,876 0 - 1+80 1957 I 960, 1962 2.2

GOMPERS 0 1+61 1+80 0 -19 1955 * 1.6

GOOD ALE K-6;7B-8) O il___ 1186 1060 0 126 1926 1937 5 .8

GRANT K-9 26.2 ' 787 930
j . 

0 -11+3 1927 1930 - 5 .0
GRAYLING ___ 682 662 0 -30 1917 1929 2 .9

GREENFIELD PARK 3Q>2 JL5j+8 1600
• 1 ■ 

0 -52 1916 1917, 1920, 1922 3 .6

GREENFIELD UNION 9.0 -&*+... 1+80 0 13!+ 1911+ 1930 1 . 1+

GREUSEL J.H. X8, 6. 81+0 0 - l l +2 1908 1917, 1919 2.7

G U E S T _________
i j

1529 11+88 288 1+1 Annx. 192b, 1930, 1931 2.6

GUYTON 80.6 1 1083 ! 1056 ! 64 27 J192 l! 1928, 1956 .. ' ' i 1+.5
i



PQ
■ TOTAL TOTAL‘TEMPORARY 

ENROLL. CAPACITY CAP.-fOR-
joRIG.
DATE

DATES OF 
ADDITIONAL CONS.

SITE
3IZEJ

HALLY ■-22.
CAP

1+ 81+8 992 0 -ll+L ! 1928 _ 1957_________

---- —»

6 .9

HAMILTON - JOx
i , 

.0-9.92___ 928 _ 0 62 L 1927 ___ 1937. 1958 3.0

HAMPTON K-8 -JZ5*
I ! ■
1 1775 1800

iJ
0 -25

1 j1 1
! 1929____ 1930. 1938. 1951+ 8.8

HANNEMAN , 1  6 8 0
.J ta .iL  676___ m

1 4
___q____ d !. 1916 1 .Q

HARDING K-9 Q-S ie q ; 1 51 0__ g ft? Anny. 1QP5. ic m  . k 7

HANSTEIN . i 2.a
’ ' ! " . 

- pl+n qqp n -IIP
j
L Ann y _ 1 q?6

HARMS 0—3_

i1
687 701+ 0 -1 7 lent; 1 8

HARRIS I.9L..P.
\ ■, ,

___ 2Q2__512__ 61+
j
!
IPG i Aqv 195ft

HEALY !
»_Q__:___ 2Q8__l+i6 fli . l i f t

! ■ ; 
i o qn )i 7

HERMAN 58.5 1505 1821+ 0 “ 319 191+1+ 19^9, 1955 2.7

HIGGINBOTHAM 99-8 606 960 96 -351+ 1928 191+3, 191+8 1+.6

HIGGINS 0.6 1 "'808 856 0 - 1+8 1931 2.2

HILLGER 99-5
i ’ ’ 

621+ 672 128 - 1+8 1912 1.0

HOLCOMB 1.0
:

799' 861+ 0 -65 1925 191+9 5-6

AL.L HOIMES & ANNES 93.2  1908 1901+ 256 1+ 1915 1919, 1921, 1927 3 .8

O.W. HOIMES
~ 1  7 1
21.3 6521 928 0 •276 1917 1922, 1931 3 .8

KOSMF.RHtfnA—------- --■--- —--
1 1

L 3 .1  106-'+, LO59 123 8 ... 192L 192? 1
-
3 . 5-

HOUGHTEN 1 .1 919
:
11008 | 0 i -89 1921+

| • ' . I
1926, 1955 ’  3-3

HOWE 99.3 1075 ; 1152 „ „  ! 61+ _ i - 7 7 : 1913 1957* 1938, 1962 ! 1+.8

HUBERT 2 . 0 ,  o >4 . 944 | JO  -9® 1921 ; 1930, 1951+

HUNTER K-9 38.3 639 900 0 - 261 1911+ 1920 1.8

HUTCHINS J.H. 99-4 lli+9 1980. 0 ■ 831 1920 1929, 1959 10.8

HUTCHINSON 97-3 111+5 1120 0 25 1916 1922, 195I+ 3 .9

ILENE PRIMARY 99-J 333

IVES ’ . 13.0  61+6 536 0 n o 1911 1957 1 .6

JACKSON J.H.
i  i 1+2. § 1568 ' 11+50 ' 0 118 1927 1930 3 .6



■ TOTAL
ENROLL.

------------- r--------- r-------- j
TOTAL !TEMPORARY 
CAPACITY CAP. I f  OR-

origI
DATE

DATES OF 
ADDITIONAL CONS.

SITE
SIZE

JAMIESON*'

r ^ _

9 9 -? 13^3 1408 192
CAP :
-65 1961 3-9

JEFFERSON J.H. 36-7 881 1480 0 -559 1922 • 1.6

JEFFRIES 98.2 613 768 64
. :1

-1?5 1953 1963______________________ 4 .9

JONES & ANNEX 99r 3 1302 \Sh 8
j

1906 195ft.. 1062 4.0

JOFFE 98.6 .. 290 320 0 -30
.■

■ 1.6

JOY J.H. 98 .8 1708
\

1570 0 138 i
J

1965
. . ' ' ■

10.5

JOYCE 99. ^
■ . 

I lk 1056 128 -282 I i? ? 7 i o£n______________________ 1.0

KEATING 93.7 1687
1

1776 0 -89 1919 19°°) 1 Q OS 1 0^7 2. 6"

KEIDAN 99.9 3 394 1440 0 6 7.0

KENNEDY 77-8 525
7(3^

.... E73 . . 192
l i t

e r a 1916 1960 2.9

KETTERING S.H. 97,1 3U72 2730 0 . 742 1965 20.0

KING
r '
91.8 . 986 736 . 64 250 1931 1949 4 .4

KING S.H. QQ f Tft7Q
V

.1910
/

.... 0 -31 33 .2

KNUDSEN J.H. 98. C 877. 910 0 -33 9.5

KOSCIUSKO 0 615 608 0 7 1956 1 .6

KROLIK ^ . e > 466 480 0 -14 1965 3 .9

LARNED 0 .4 231 288 0 -57
.

. 1954 3 .2

LAW lH.c ' ....397 384 0 13
1
! 1925 1946, 1954 5 .4

LESLIE 7-8 .535 640 0 -105
]
: Annx. 1 1925. 1952______________ 3 .2

LESSENGER J.H. 8.3 1040 1070 0 -30
j '

10.0

LILLIBRIDGE 9 3 . i • 1551 1696 192 -145 i 1905*
j
1 1908. 1912, 1924 3 .9

LINCOLN 100 1194 1678 0 -484 ! 1912
J

I. .1916, 1920 1 .5

LINGEMANN $0,2 967 89 6 64 71
i
! 1915 | 3 .7

LODGE 1,0 . 341 4 i6 0 -75 ! 1950 7 6.0
LOGAN 2*1_ 588 ~~W\ 0 1926 2.1
LONGFELLOW J.H. 99.8 ___1Q27 - - 1638 128 -611 1917 1919, 1925, 1957 in  7

LYNCH 600 608 0 -8 19 14 1921 ___1*5



7 .
.......... ... r.... .....V .............

! TOTAL
<&B IENROLL.

TOTAL
CAPACITY

TEMPORARY 
CAP. -f~OR~ 1

ORIG.
DATE

DATES OF ADDITIONAL 
CONSTRUCTION

SITE
£pZE •

MACCULLOCH

r* ■
• '
59.3 1482 ; 1536

!
64

CAP.!
-54 1 1925 ! 1926, 1938 3 .8

MACDOWELL
■

98.2 910 I 976 ; 0 -66 19^2 ; 1944, 1948, 1949,& 1 3 .2

MACK PRIMARY 98.8
i

173 !
! 1• . ; 1 1950.

1

MACKENZIE S.H. 96.8
V

3250 2820 210 430
.

1927 1929, 1930, 1938,& 19.7

MACOMB 2.8 . 537 544 0 '
i

-7 1929 I 2 .1

MANN 3 .If if 99 &  ! ---- m
' i

0
£ 0 5a*""' (. -t- f  * 1944 : 19^9, 195^ 3 .7

MARCY 98.3 594 ... 8.32 ! 128 -238 : 1912 1922, 1958, 1959 1 .7

MARK TWAIN QQ.7 684 992 : 128
i !

-308 ________ 1961 5 .0  ‘

MARQUETTE 0. f3 688. 928
- 1 

0 -240 i 1950 1952, 1956 7.4

MARXHAUSEN 96.9 1108
.1

928 p ‘ ! 180 1
|

1914 1920, 1959 . 3 .8

MARSH 0 183.
■

352 0........
J

-169 i 1955
• ■

1 .2

MARSHALL 6 i.n 1392
s :

1280
i I

0
t

112 i 1929 1931 2 .7

MASON S2-7 837. 768
■

0
!

69 S
.

1931 1946. 1952 3 .9

MAYBEE 99.6 454 832 64
11

.-378. 1916 1921. 1959 2 .9

MAYBURY P.Q (399 808 0 . 21.. 1957 1962. 1969 0.5

McC'OLL n.5 394 f 544 0 -150 1951. 1951 ____3*8

McFARLANE 8 ? .0 935 .1308 448 -373 1926 ... 1931. 1952 ■ ..... .3 ,7

McGRAW qlf.7 659 800
<

0 -.141 . 1899 ♦ 4 .2

McGREGOR ,17.6 . 438 . .480 0 -42 1953

McKENNY 5*7 . .840 1152 . 0 -312 1951 1953. 1959. 1961 4 .4  (

McKERROW 9 8 .6j 1078 _ 1248. i  64... -170 1927 j 1957

McKINSTRY if.o '1 596 640
!
! 0 1905 1962 2 .9

McLEAN 0 214 352 0 -138 1953 1 . 2 .2

McMICHAEL J.H. 99.8 .... 980 1540 0 -.560 1916 1921

McMILLAN K;7B-9^ 48.5 426 ... 640 . 0 -214. 1895 1925, 1962 2 .1

METTETAL J.H. 36-1 653 700 0 -47 Annx. 1926, 1956 3 .1  -

|

I M . II- M» M *(



8

—

#B
TOTAL
ENROLL.

- ...........
\

TOTAL
CAPACITY

i
TEMPOR.
CAP.

A R Y
+ 0R ~
-CAP.

ORIG.
DATE

DATES OF 
ADDITIONAL CONS.

SITE
SIZE
!

MILLER J.H. 98.3 1055 1450 0 -395 1918 1922, 1931, 1951. 6.3

MONICA PRIMARY 98.4 377
1957-

MONNIER 88.4 1405 i  1344 0 61 Annx. 1924 3 .9

MONTEITH 8Q. 5 ! 762 ..1040 192
i

-278 i 1905 .1959, 1963 3 .4

MORLEY 16,6 1 .685
3?6
C T ' 0 •

5 / /
.1903 1924. 1958. 1962 2 .6

MOORE inn
i ■
f 533 999 __ Q____  -459 1907 1912. 1919 . _ 3 .1

MUMFORD Qft.l
f : .

20,59 ...?6on 0 459 1948 1949. 1951. 1954 19 -7

MUNGER J.H. k 6 , k .980 S 6 ¥ -576 /<&> .1965 4 .0

MURPHY J.H. 0 .8 1259. 1280 0 -21 1962 7.6

MURRAY-WRIGHT S.H. 95.3 2072 2640 0 -■?68 1965 6 .6 -

MYRTLE 58.12 500 6 3 2 0 - / J £

NEINAS 4 .4 702
•!

768 i 0 1916 1922. 1924. I960 1 .5

NEWBERRY 72 .8 946 992 0 -46 1928 5 .6

NEWTON 21.8 849 880.. 0 -31 1924 1929. 1949, 1951 2 .9

NICHOLS 99.0

■

799 1048 128 -249 1910 1919. 1957-9.& 2 .1

NOBLE K-9 9<?t5 1903 1720 320 -183 1921
1961.
1924 _ 6 .2

NOLAN J.H. (38.9 1799 1370 __ Q____ ___ 22_ 1926 1930 _ 8 .2

NORTHEASTERN S.H. 93.2
; v.

1437 1590 0 ! -153
•

1914
♦

_ 5 .4

NORTHERN S.H. 98.9 1767 9930 120____ -463 1914 1921. 1957 £ a3

NORTHWESTERN S.H. 99.9 . 9981 984n 0 l4 l
‘

1912 1921r 1924 1 1 .6 3

NORVELL inn 996 51 9 __ Q____ __216.
,

1879 1894, 3.895 —2.9

OSBORN SH ik  n 3071
1

9630
" !.

n 44i 1957 1962...................... 23.2

OWEN 7n.8

J  1

ka6.
8 3 a
3 t

3 3 6
198___ . rrrs- l f t 7 9 1 901 r 1902j. 1958 2.9

PARKE & ANNEX 57.9 897 099. 384 -1 83 1900 1 91 9r 1961 1.0

f f lS k M W * # 8
64n I?91 m . 1 948x 1956

PALMER i n  9 Ji?3 768 6k ... _3k3 1890 1901 1.0

PASTEUR 99 1 m o o ... 1190
, V 

0 -120 1931 1950. 1955 .. 3.3

PATTSNGILL QQ )i_ l l l i o n -188 1919 1921. 1957---------------



\

9 .

- 1
j ' $>B - :l 

99.5 !

TOTAL
ENROLL.

TOTAL ! 
CAPACITY

TEMPO] 
CAP."]

3 ARY 
33R

ORIG.
DATE

DATES OF 
ADDITIONAL CONS

SITE
.SIZE

P .QPECK 985 1248 0
CAP.
, 2 6 s lQ6l . j

PELHAM J.H.
“ f

81.3 721 930 0 -209 i ' ...
8 .6

PEIRCE 62.1 483 576 0 -93 ' j 1915 ! 1921, 1952 2 .4

PERSHING S.H. 63.8 3244 2600 30 1 644 : 19 29 ! 1930, 1939, 1945, TQ.o

PINGREE 100 706 848 64 ! -142 1902 j
& 1949.
■\ qc;A -1 a£o 1 Q

PITCHER ___6 .4 .... 6̂ 7
j

- A 96 . 0 -2PQ *
i

lQlift i 1950. 1Q5Q 4.5

POST J.H. —go. 3....j j ..
. . ' I 

1673
j

isnA
j

0 ; 1 6 5 ! 1 QPO 1Q54 9 .4

POTTER --fi.5-».Q....
i• -. _ • ■ | 

ISP 224 0 -73  i 1956 0 .8

PRESTON
, 32 . 2 , 255

. 1 ■ |
352

■ i
0 -97 1 1894 1962 0.7

PRIEST ...16.8 JL057
1

0
-65*1

1924 1925. 1931 10.4

PULASKI
____£ L 3___ TOO 1168

i
0 -459 1944 1947. 1950, 1955 3-1

REDFORD S.H. ___ a .„9 .. -3 ?8 l 2710
■ ! 

0 1071 1921 1937. 1949. 1953 13.7

REEVES 2 - 2
'
- 8 q 160 0 -71 1961

• '
0 .6

RICHARD K-9 — 3-h3__ ....6 q q 920 0 -221 1929 1931. 1944 3.3

ROBINSON ___ 2 - 6 ....
-

■ ■755 012 0 -157 1925 1926
■ >

3 .9

ROOSEVELT — 99.7 . - 1^78 I 76O ... 0
*

-182 1925 1930. 1958 3 .4

ROSE
. . •

97 -7
■

6k 5 5 7 6 64 60 1 1899 ( 1 .3

RUDDIMAN J.H.
— 1 9 .4 JI9Q.. 1200 0 10

1
! 1922 ! 1955 *

RUTHRUFF — 99-1___r 60S 736 ... 0 : -41
t— .....
j 1925 1930 1 .0

SAMPSON
- . - 9 9 -9 ___ . 766

&C0
0

u W
i d t i t ! 1911 1920. 1921 2.5

SANDERS
— 9 9 . 9 ___ .1024

.
0 U «  !

3 .j .
5 .6

SCHULZE 9 6 , 6 9 1  6 1 0 5 6

•
0 ^-140

1
! 1028 1 19P9. 1944. 194<?. 5 .8

.qfPTPPc;
— 9 8 .6  . 852 ! 832 * 0 1 20

1
! 1808 & 1953 3 .0

SCRIPPS' ANNEX - . 98. 1.1 3 7 9 1 s A k 6 k
1 j

-205 ! 1.1
SHERRARD J.H. —100 ....

■
1 75n ..0 -114 1923 4 .6

SHERRILL
— 9 9 0 )__ - 1 3 5 7

’
ikkO ... 0 -83 1924

1
! 1926. 1930 7 .4

SILL -  95.7— —£ U___
s w

0
T S S

4^3 1905 1 .0

SOUTHEASTERN S.H -̂Uq-3 9710 ,-2310
1/

60 400 - 1 2 1 5 - .-1222____________ 8.1



10

• - n---------- -

$B
TOTAL
ENROLL

L......

! TOTAL 
i CAPACIl

TEMPO 
Y CAP.

3ARY
f-O R -

ORIG.
DATE

DATES OF
ADDITIONAL i^^NST.

SITE
SIZE

20.5

6*3

! 3 .8

7 .2
j
' 1.6 

! ^ 5

w /s t .C la ir  

6.1 

39.6

SOUTHWESTERN S.H 74.3 1767 1930 30
CAP.
-163 1915

. ....... ..nYin.....
1920

SPAIN J.H. WITH LINCOLN
)

STARK 98.0 853 912 ‘ 0 . ! -59 , ’ ■

STELLWAGEN 0 827 736 128 ! 91 1928 19^1 , 1934
STEPHENS 98.9 973 1088 0 -115 1913 1917, 1921
STEVENSON 317

j
192 192 : 125

ST. CLAIR 97.0
j . i ,

911 1 1568 0 “657 I 898 1914, 1915
ST. CLAIR ANNEX 99.2 517 j • ' • ' 1 . •

■

STEWART 98.8 7 66 800 0 -34 .

TAFT J.H. — P-t.7., ____987 970 0 17 1962
TENDLER —8,8.0

|. i ■ 
------376 288 0 88 1962 1 .7

TAPPAN J.H. —9.9.8 - 1 4 6 9  1460 0 1928 1920. 1090.
"F  ' r >  

5.6
THIRKELL -LOO

9 o a  |
. « s a s -  1 1344 fiu n - 1014

' .
10P0. IQRft 3 .0

1.3

4 9

THOMAS —92.1
s w

-
’ ... ' ! ; 0?*
568 0 ' Ujk 1Q0S !

TRIX ___n
j —■ 

___688 ___Q__
1

1Q44 10S0
TROMBLY 00.9 ___ 300.,...__________

!s
!

■

TURNER,E.M. TOO
I

___ 300 : 384
j

- _ o ____[ - 8 4 1014 1 1.15
VANDENEERG 09. S Eli-S . 4 l6 0 -71 10S4

4
2 4

VAN ZILE -A1..S ___4l 8 W/Er-tw
■
e ll IQ?! P h

VERNOR - Qfi-Q ___ 794 q ? 8

• ; | 
TOP -194 1047 1 QRO c: 1

VETAL - O-P oo4 lOSfi fi4 ! -fip
. ;

1 OPS !
1 090. 1 QliP

J it -* -  

k 7

VON STEUBEN J.H.
S L 3 ------- -3 3 79 . 070

1

0 PCtt 1090
1

io 4 s . i q 4 q . i

- i f  I

4 P
WAYNE

1 . 6 ___806 .832 1 0 -26 1030 1091. 1090. 104C 5  q

WEATHERBY _Q______
j

___330 ...4 l6  ■ 64 -86 10S7
& 1948.

i .J  • 7

3 0
WEBBER J.H. - 9 9 .7 -1 3 8 9 1 S00 0 ! -111 10.0
WEBSTER 1 1 -9

I
— 788, ; .8 3 2  ! 0 -44 1887 19SS 4.1

WESTERN S.H. 2241.
j

1950 ! 0 291 1924 1937 2.6
W H I T E ________ 1696 0 -654 1919 1925, 1929 4 .9  •



1

11
* * • > * . 1

TOTAL
ENROLL.

TOTAL
CAPACITY

— !
TEMPO?

CAP.
ARY • 
-f-OR-

1
ORIG.
DATE

DATES OF ADDITIONAL 
CONSTRUCTION

SITE
SIZE--—— -4--r*-* .

WILKINS 13-1
, |

966 i 928 0
CAP.
38 1925

KK

1926 *4.0

WILLIAMS 99-3 886 1216 38*4 -330 1929 1958 14.21

WILSON J.H. 2.1 1123
,

1180 0 -57 1916 1927 5.1

WINGERT 99.0 635
8 W

! °
/87

1906 1921, 1957
>11 1 H II. »•» 
2 .1

WINSHIP K-9 70.3 1103 ...
v

1125 0 -22 19*43 19*47, 1950, 195*4 3 .8

WINTERHALTER: 99.0 807 1150 0 -3*43 1921 192*4 11.7

WOODWARD 99 .0 .. 781
% s

tZJ 0 3 .1

YOST ... 317 ’ k80 0 -163 1926 1962 5 .2

■ ».

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

1970 Analysis of Facility Utilization

Impact area

Topic

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in