1-24 of 46

Content type Title Description
Attorney Notes on Bradley Re-Argument Date is approximate.
Attorney Notes from Oral Argument (Transcript) Date is approximate.
Outline Preparing for Argument Date is approximate.
Attorney Notes on Argument Date is approximate.
Attorney Notes on Grosse Pointe Petition for Rehearing En Banc Date is approximate.
Attorney Notes on Allen Park Petition for Rehearing En Banc Date is approximate.
Attorney Notes on State Defendants' Petition for Rehearing En Banc Date is approximate.
The Pertinent Proceedings with Respect to Suburban Intervenors Date is approximate.
Attorney Notes on Rule 19 Issues Date is approximate.
Memorandum in Opposition to Petitions for Writs of Certiorari RE Bloomfield Hills Sch. Dist. v. Hon. J. Roth Date is approximate.
Draft Memorandum in Opposition to Petitions for Writs of Certiorari Date is approximate.
Reply and Supplemental Brief
Court Opinion from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals
Supplemental Brief for Respondents Bradley, et al. Date is approximate.
Copy of Conclusions of Law; Box Inventories Date is approximate.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Support of Ruling on Desegregation Area and Development of Plan
Ruling on Desegregation Area and Order for Development of Plan of Desegregation
Response of Defendant to Petition for Writ of Certiorari Filed by William Milliken and Frank J. Kelley Response of Defendant Detroit Board of Education to Petition for Writ of Certiorari Filed by William Milliken and Frank J. Kelley
Ruling on Desegregation Area and Order for Development of Desegregation Plan; Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Support of Ruling on Desegregation Plan Ruling on Desegregation Area and Order for Development of Plan of Desegregation; Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in Support of Ruling on Desegregation Area and Development of Plan
Motion to Quash Subpoena to Produce Document or Object and Notice of Hearing Thereon
Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Allowing Plaintiffs to Present Desegregation Plans at the Board's Expense Defendant Board of Education's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Allowing Plaintiffs to Present Desegregation Plans at the Board's Expense
Motion to Quash Subpoena to Produce Document or Object and Notice of Hearing Thereon
Defendants Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Allowing Plaintiffs to Present Desegregation Plans at the Board's Expense Defendant Board of Education's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Allowing Plaintiffs to Present Desegregation Plans at the Board's Expense
Inventory of Materials and August 27th Hearing
Return to top