Correspondences between Guinier and Stevas; Supreme Court Appearance Form for Guinier as Counsel; C. Lani Guinier Affidavit of Mailing;

    August 3, 1984

Honorable Alexander L. Stevas
CIerk
Supreme Court of the Unite,C States
Washington, D.C. 20543

Re: Rufus L. Edmisten, €t dI.,
vs. Ralph Gingles, €t aI.

No. 83-1968

Dear lvlr. Stevas:

Enclosed please find forty (401 copies of the
Dlotion to Dismiss or Affirm filed by Appelleer s
Ralph Ging1es, €t. al., in the above case.

A11 parties reguired to be served have been
served as evidenced by the enclosed Certificate
of Service,

Sincerely.

Lani Guinier
Counsel for Appellees

LGlad
Enc1s.

cc3 All Counsel

99 HUOSON STREET (2't2t 219-1900 NEWYORK,NYlOOl3



APP&TRANCE FORM

SIIPBMM COUBT OF TEE UNITED STATES

po.83-1968 , Oc:oaun Tenu, l9g

Rufus L. Edmisten, €t. aI. Ralph Gingles, €t. al.

(Petitioner or Appellant)

The Clerk will enter my sppearance aa Counsel for the

Eigneture

Type or Priat Name Guinier

Address 99 Hudson Street, I6th floor

City and g,"r" llew Yorkr New York 10013

NOTE: This appearance must be signed by an individual Member of the Bar of the Supreme

The Clerk is requested to notify counsel of action of the Court by means of:
[ ] CoUect Telegram

[ ] Airmail Ietter

I x] Regular Mail

NOTE: When more than one ettorney repnesents a single party or group of parties, counsel
should designate a particular individual to whom notification is to be sent, with the
understending that if other counsel should be informed he will perform that function.

(llespondent or Appellce)

In this case the person to be notified for
is:

Lani Guinier
(

99 Hudson Street, 15th floor
(Street Address)

New York, New York 10013
(c

co-73

[ ] Petitioner(a)

[ ] Respondent(s)

[ ] Appellant(s)

k I Appellee(s)

[ ] Amicus



August 3, 1984

Honorable Alexander L. Stevas
CIerk
Supreme Court of the Uniteci States
Washington, D.C. 20543

Re: Rufus L. Edmisten, et aI.,
vs. Ralph Gingles, €t aI.

No.83-I958

Dear lrlr. Stevas:

Enclosed please find forty (40) copies of theMotion to Dismiss or Affirm filed by Appellee's
Ralph Gingles, €t. dl., in the above clse.

All parties reguired to be served have beenserved as evidenced by the encLosed certificateof Service.

Sincerely2Ulw
Lani Gui-nier
Counsel for Appellees

LGlad
EncIs.

cc: A11 Counsel

99 HUDSON STREET (212) 219-1900 NEWYORK.NYlOOl3



I'Io. 83-1958

IN THE

ST'PREI',I,E COURT OF THE T'NITED STATES

October Term, 1983

RUFUS L. EDII{ISTEN, et d1.,

Appe1lants,

v-

RELPH GINGLES, €t aI.,
Appellees.

On Appeal From the United
States District Court For
The Eastern District of
North Carolina

AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING

C. LANI GUINIER, being duly sworn, deposes and states:

I. I am an attorney for Appellees Ralph Gingles,

et a1., and I am a member of the Bar of this Court.

2. Pursuant to Rule 28.2 of the Rules of this
Courtr on August 3, 1984, dt approximately 4:00 p.m., E.D.S.T.,

I caused to be placed forty (40) copies of the Appellees'

I',lotion to Dismiss or Af f irm in a package addressed to the Clerk

of this Court, with first class postage prepaid,. and caused the

package to be placed in the United States mail, in a mail box

under the exclusive care and custody of the United States Postal

Service within the City and State of New York.

c,
INIER

Sworn to before me this

3rd day of August, 1984.

w^tm R. P|SE
iobry Public, Stare of llew yon

I tto. al.{76688

;,*[xfl Jil.! ff[,,8i[,% re

Notary Pub1ic



tlo. 83-1958

IN THE

ST'PRET'IE COURT OF THE T'NITED STATES

October Term, I983

RUFUS L. EDIIISTEN, et &1.,

Appel Iants ,

RALPH GINGLES, €t d1.,

Appellees.

On Appeal From the United
States District Court For
The Eastern District of
North Carolina

AFFIDAVIT OF }IAILING

C. LANI GUINIER, being duly sworn, deposes and states:

I. I am an attorney for Appellees Ralph Ging1es,

et a1., and I am a member of the Bar of this Court.

2. Pursuant to Rule 28.2 of the Rules of this
Courtr orl August 3, 1984, dt approximately 4:00 p.m., E.D.S.T.,

I caused to be placed forty (40) copies of the Appellees'

I'{otion to Dismiss or Af f irm in a package addressed to the Clerk

of this Court, with first class postage prepaidr, and caused the

package to be placed in the United States mail, in a mail box

under the exclusive care and custody of the United States Postal

Service within the City and State of New York.

c,
INIER

Sworn to before me this

3rd day of August, 1984.

_ tvil.ilA R. P|SE
, irl|rry Public, Stare ol- ller yon

L l{0. 41.{?66E8

;,HXli fl Jil, l'i:?i,'3i[' 
.i, rz

Notary Public



l.lo. 83-1968

I}i THE

SUPREM,E COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

October Term, 1983

RUFUS L. EDMISTEN, et &1.,

AppelIants,

v-

RALPH GINGLES, €t d1.,

Appellees.

On Appeal From the United
States District Court For
The Eastern District of
North Carolina

AT.FIDAVIT OF IvIAILING

C. LANI GUINIER, being duly sworn, deposes and states:

I. I am an attorney for Appellees Ralph Gingles,

et dI., and I am a member of the Bar of this Court.

2. Pursuant to Rule 28.2 of the Rules of this

Court, oD August 3, 1984, dt approxirnately 4:00 p.m., E.D.S.T.,

I caused to be placed forty (40) copies of the Appellees'

I,lotion to Dismiss or Af f irm in a package addressed to the Clerk

of this Court, with first class postage prepaid,. and caused the

package to be placed in the United States mail, in a mail box

under the exclusive care and custody of the United States Postal

Service within the City and State of New York.

11
L-,

INIER

Sworn to before me this

3rd day of August, 1984.

- tvlt Ht R. P SSt
, ioLry Public, State of lhr yon

L t{0. 41.{766E8

;,?$:xli'x, Jil. !t:l:, Til 
,i, az

Notary Public