Correspondence from Winner to Wallace

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at .

Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 0fcadc85-de92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Correspondence from Winner to Wallace, 1982. 0fcadc85-de92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/475e1d62-6715-4cc8-8230-7091cfcf4bd6/correspondence-from-winner-to-wallace. Accessed December 05, 2025.

Copied!

    CHAMBERS. FERGUSON. WATT, WALLAS, ADKINS 8c FULLER. P.A

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SUITE 730 EAST INDEPENDENCE PLAZA

951 SOUTH INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD

JULIUS LEVONNE CHAMBERS
JAMES E. FERGUSON. II
MELVIN L. WATT
JONATHAN WALLAS
KARL ADKINS

JAMES C FULLER. JR.
YVONNE MIMS EVANS
JOHN W GRESHAM
RONALD L. GIBSON
GILDA F GLAZER
LESLIE J. WINNER
JOHN T. NOCKLEBY'

 

' OF D C BAR ONLY

CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28202

TELEPHONE (704) 375-8461

April 21, 1982

Mr. James C. Wallace, Jr.

Deputy Attorney General for
Legal Affairs

N.C. Department of Justice

Post Office Box 629

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602

Re: Gingles v. Edmisten

 

Dear Mr. Wallace:
This letter is in response to your letter of April 20, 1982,
and in confirmation of our telephone conversation of earlier
today.

With regard to your second set of interrogatories, which con-
cern Congressional reapportionment, I have mailed today under
separate cover,plaintiffs'Request for Voluntary Dismissal of
the claims concerning the Congressional plan. If the Court
approves this dismissal, then I assume that you will withdraw
those interrogatories, and you agreed that there is no point
in plaintiffs' answering your second set of interrogatories
at this time.

Your first set of interrogatories concern the current appor—
tionment of the North Carolina General Assembly. As you know,
the United States Department of Justice entered an objection
to those apportionments on April 19, 1982. Thus, unless the
State files suit in the District Court for the District of
Columbia, and gets a declaratory judgment approving the plans,
they cannot be enforced. Thus those questions which relate

to the particular apportionments are, or may be, irrelevant.

I have enclosed our stipulation that plaintiffs will answer
these interrogatories by May 13, 1982, as we agreed today on
the telephone. I am also mailing three copiestKJthe Clerk.

Mr. James C. Wallace, Jr.
April 21, 1982

Page 2

However, I reiterate that I have signed the stipulation
Without waiving our right to object to questions about the
particular apportionments which are, or become irrelevant.

As we discussed earlier, I have appreciated our ability to
cooperate in the past, and I believe that we will both be
better off if we continue our past rational, level headed,
approachwhichhas,forthenwstpart,savedbothofim, as well
as the Court, needless work. After this afternoon's dis—
cussion, I am confident that this small dispute is resolved
and that we will continue to cooperate as we have in the
past.

Sincerely,

:1 ,2 [II/- [I

Leslie J. Winner

JLW: ddb

Enclosure

cc: Judge James Dickson Phillips, Jr.
Judge F. T. Dupree, Jr.
Judge W. Earl Britt
All Attorneys of Record

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Winner to Wallace

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in