Correspondence from Edmisten to Leonard
Public Court Documents
January 27, 1982

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Correspondence from Edmisten to Leonard, 1982. 3d1f291c-e292-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/59d9874d-48a5-47cd-a743-a82c4230a667/correspondence-from-edmisten-to-leonard. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
A" tU'U' L EOMIS?EX Attoatrlv Olhla l tr )r 'iJ ,r i:, ,v ,- -l J; i -3 i:'bZ tliAiriliiS, f::::::l; VllII, lIALLtS; Ft.ii;is & frillX, Pl\ Strrtc of. Forttf @uolina papartmart of Uusticc P. O. Eox 629 RALETGH 27602 January 27, L982 Honorable J. Rich Leonard, Clerk United States District Court Eastern District Federal Building Raleigh, North Carolina 2?67L RE: Gingles v. Edmisten, Civil No. 81-803-CIV-5 Pugh v. Hunt, civil trlo. 81-1006-cIV-5 Dear Mr. Leonard: Enclosed please find, for filing, four copies of defendants' Motion to Consolidate and Request for Three-Judge Court. The Motion, of course, concerns the above-entitled matters. Counsel for all plaintiffs have been contacted, and all have authorized me to inform you thattkre/ consent to the consol-idation. In light of that fact, w€ have not prepared a brief in support of the motion. If, in spite of the consent of all parties, the loca1 ruJ-es still require the filing of a briefr w€ will be more than willing to do so, if you so advise. Al1 parties trave also agreed to provide the Court with a stipulation regarding the new discovery scheduie shortly. f wi1L prepare and forward that stipulation to you upon its completion. Please return a copy of the "filed" Motion to me at your convenience. Thank you for your usual cooperation. Very truly yours, RUFUS L. EDMTSTEN peputy Attorney General e2, Legal Affairs "r*ffiru JWJR,/dm