Correspondence from Edmisten to Leonard
Public Court Documents
January 27, 1982
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Correspondence from Edmisten to Leonard, 1982. 3d1f291c-e292-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/59d9874d-48a5-47cd-a743-a82c4230a667/correspondence-from-edmisten-to-leonard. Accessed November 29, 2025.
Copied!
A"
tU'U' L EOMIS?EX
Attoatrlv Olhla l
tr
)r
'iJ
,r
i:, ,v
,-
-l
J; i -3 i:'bZ
tliAiriliiS, f::::::l; VllII, lIALLtS;
Ft.ii;is & frillX, Pl\
Strrtc of. Forttf @uolina
papartmart of Uusticc
P. O. Eox 629
RALETGH
27602
January 27, L982
Honorable J. Rich Leonard, Clerk
United States District Court
Eastern District
Federal Building
Raleigh, North Carolina 2?67L
RE: Gingles v. Edmisten, Civil No. 81-803-CIV-5
Pugh v. Hunt, civil trlo. 81-1006-cIV-5
Dear Mr. Leonard:
Enclosed please find, for filing, four copies of defendants'
Motion to Consolidate and Request for Three-Judge Court. The
Motion, of course, concerns the above-entitled matters.
Counsel for all plaintiffs have been contacted, and all have
authorized me to inform you thattkre/ consent to the consol-idation.
In light of that fact, w€ have not prepared a brief in support of
the motion. If, in spite of the consent of all parties, the
loca1 ruJ-es still require the filing of a briefr w€ will be more
than willing to do so, if you so advise.
Al1 parties trave also agreed to provide the Court with a
stipulation regarding the new discovery scheduie shortly. f wi1L
prepare and forward that stipulation to you upon its completion.
Please return a copy of the "filed" Motion to me at your
convenience.
Thank you for your usual cooperation.
Very truly yours,
RUFUS L. EDMTSTEN
peputy Attorney General
e2, Legal Affairs
"r*ffiru
JWJR,/dm