Ltr. to Kathleen McGuan from Leslie Winner
Correspondence
March 29, 1984

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Correspondence from Chambers to Smith, 1985. f4eafd24-de92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/de758553-d465-44e4-b1c0-26d1c60563c8/correspondence-from-chambers-to-smith. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
3 L esar E&rense H. U$ i.",:i"'""#i:iH',31: ^i ?:i;'l;ra.N June 25, 1985 George C. Smith, Esq. Associate General Counsel Washington Legal For.rndation 1705 N Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Dear Mr. Smith: t am writing in response to your letter of June 17, 1985 seeking consent for filing an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court in Thornburg v. Ginqle.s. I enclose a copy of the letter of consent which ffirk of the United States Supreme Court. Sincerely, JLC /nlc Enc!. Contri.butiont are dcductiblt -for l'.S. intont( Lai purfnses The NAACp LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIoNAL FUND rs not parl o{ the National Association tor the Advancemenl ol CotoreC People altnough 11 wasloundedbyttandsharesitscommitmenltoequalrights LDFhashadlorover25yearsaseparaleBoard.program slatl otliceandbudget c. 1900 ulius L. Chambers Director-Counsel June 25, 1985 The Hon. Joseph Spaniol Clerk United States Supreme Court Washington, D.C. 20543 Re: Thornburg, et al. v. Gingles, et al. No. 83- I968 Dear Mr. Spaniol: I am writing as counsel for respondents in Gingles, et al to consent to the timely filing of the Washington Legal Foundation. JLC /nlc bcc: Leslie Winner Lani Guinier Thornburg, et al. v. a brief amicus curiae by Very truly yours, lius L. Chambers Counsel for Respondents NINETY NINE HUDSON STREET (.212) 219- 1 900 NEW YORK N.Y 10013 WesurNGToN Lnc^u FouNoerrorv I7O5 N STREET, N. W. WASHINGTON, D. C.20036 ?o?- 457-0240 June 1-7, 1985 Lani Guinier, Esq. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. 99 Hudson Street - 15th Floor New York, NY I00I3 Re: Edmisten v. Gingles, No. 83-1968 (U.S. Supreme Court) Dear lv1s. Guinier : The Washington Legal Foundation ("WLF"), a non-profit public interest law center based in Washington, D.C., is planning to file a brief amicus curiae supporting the appellants in the referenced case. In accordance with Supreme Court Rule 36, we hereby request the appellees' consent to the filing of wLF's brief. In essence, WLFrs brief will argue that the district court erred in treating Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act as though it' compels the fashioning of districts which, wherever possible, will allow bloc voting by minorities to control the outcome of elections. wLF,; brief wilI also argue that the district court erred in finding that the North Carolina districts were characterized bi u legalIy fatal degree of "polarized voting". Counsel for the appellants have already indicated their consent to the filing of WLF's brief. If you agree to consent to the filing of our brief, would you please send a brief note to that effeit so that, in compliance with RuIe 36, we can file without seeking leave of Court. Thank you for Your consideration. Sincerely, ,v/'vk-<r"//4t G"org" c,/ smitrr GCS:jab Associate General Counsel