Ltr. to Kathleen McGuan from Leslie Winner

Correspondence
March 29, 1984

Ltr. to Kathleen McGuan from Leslie Winner preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Correspondence from Chambers to Smith, 1985. f4eafd24-de92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/de758553-d465-44e4-b1c0-26d1c60563c8/correspondence-from-chambers-to-smith. Accessed April 06, 2025.

    Copied!

    3
L esar E&rense H. U$ i.",:i"'""#i:iH',31: 

^i 
?:i;'l;ra.N

June 25, 1985

George C. Smith, Esq.
Associate General Counsel
Washington Legal For.rndation
1705 N Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036

Dear Mr. Smith:

t am writing in response to your letter of June 17, 1985 seeking
consent for filing an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court in
Thornburg v. Ginqle.s. I enclose a copy of the letter of consent which
ffirk of the United States Supreme Court.

Sincerely,

JLC /nlc
Enc!.

Contri.butiont are dcductiblt -for l'.S. intont( Lai purfnses

The NAACp LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIoNAL FUND rs not parl o{ the National Association tor the Advancemenl ol CotoreC People altnough 11

wasloundedbyttandsharesitscommitmenltoequalrights LDFhashadlorover25yearsaseparaleBoard.program slatl otliceandbudget

c.
1900

ulius L. Chambers
Director-Counsel



June 25, 1985

The Hon. Joseph Spaniol
Clerk
United States Supreme Court
Washington, D.C. 20543

Re: Thornburg, et al. v. Gingles, et al.

No. 83- I968

Dear Mr. Spaniol:

I am writing as counsel for respondents in

Gingles, et al to consent to the timely filing of

the Washington Legal Foundation.

JLC /nlc

bcc: Leslie Winner
Lani Guinier

Thornburg, et al. v.
a brief amicus curiae by

Very truly yours,

lius L. Chambers
Counsel for Respondents

NINETY NINE HUDSON STREET (.212) 219- 1 900 NEW YORK N.Y 10013



WesurNGToN Lnc^u FouNoerrorv
I7O5 N STREET, N. W.

WASHINGTON, D. C.20036
?o?- 457-0240

June 1-7, 1985

Lani Guinier, Esq.
NAACP Legal Defense

& Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson Street - 15th Floor
New York, NY I00I3

Re: Edmisten v. Gingles, No. 83-1968 (U.S. Supreme Court)

Dear lv1s. Guinier :

The Washington Legal Foundation ("WLF"), a non-profit public
interest law center based in Washington, D.C., is planning to file
a brief amicus curiae supporting the appellants in the referenced
case. In accordance with Supreme Court Rule 36, we hereby request
the appellees' consent to the filing of wLF's brief.

In essence, WLFrs brief will argue that the district court
erred in treating Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act as though it'
compels the fashioning of districts which, wherever possible, will
allow bloc voting by minorities to control the outcome of
elections. wLF,; brief wilI also argue that the district court
erred in finding that the North Carolina districts were
characterized bi u legalIy fatal degree of "polarized voting".

Counsel for the appellants have already indicated their
consent to the filing of WLF's brief. If you agree to consent to
the filing of our brief, would you please send a brief note to
that effeit so that, in compliance with RuIe 36, we can file
without seeking leave of Court.

Thank you for Your consideration.

Sincerely,

,v/'vk-<r"//4t G"org" c,/ smitrr

GCS:jab

Associate General Counsel

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top