Correspondence from Chambers to Williams, Suitts, Kline, and Winner
Correspondence
August 31, 1981

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Correspondence from Chambers to Williams, Suitts, Kline, and Winner, 1981. fe342622-e292-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/bc1f9596-b239-44ab-8dc1-86a86eb0ab4b/correspondence-from-chambers-to-williams-suitts-kline-and-winner. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
ear,* ,J(JI.ItIS LEVONNT CTIAMBERS JAMES E FERGUSON, II MELVIN L WATT JONATHAN WALLAS KARL AOKINS JAMES C FULLER, JR C YVONNE MIMS ,OHN W GRESHAM RONAI.O L GIBSON GI{-L)A F GLAZER L.ESt IE J WINNER .HAMBERT l)*or.oN, wArr *ALLAS, ADKTNS Or.r.*. ".o.ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 73O EAST INDEPENOENCE PLAZA 95I SOUTH INOEPENDENCE BOULEVARD CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA 2A2O2 TELEPHONE (704) 375-8461 August 31, f981 Mr. Napoleon B. Williams, Jr. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. Mr. Steve Suitts Southern Regional Council Mr. Richard Kline Legal Services of North Carolina Ms. Leslie Winner Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Wallas, Adkins & Fuller, P.A. Re: North Carolina Reapportionment Suit Dear Gentlemen and Leslie: I met with the Department of Justice on August 26 and obtained a copy of the encloded submission by North Carolina and the objections which have been filed. I do not have the Republican objection. It is being mailed to me. I understand that Justice will ask for mcre information. I indicated, however, that we would be filing objections on behalf of our clients shortly and would indicate that we are putting together some additional supporting data. Even if Justice asks for additional information, I think we should get our objections on fi1e. You may or may not know that the thrce-judge court in Virginia declared the reapportionmenL of Virginia unconstitutional. The decision is based on the one-man, one-vote issue and since I Mr. Napoleon B. Williams, Jr. Mr. Steve Suitts Mr. Richard Kline Ms. Leslie Winner August 31, I9Bl Page Two variances in North Carolina are at least equal to the variances declared unconstitutional in Virginia, we should have a good chance with respect to this issue. For relief purposes, however, we need to file the suit as soon as possible. Please let us have your cornrnents about Leslie's latest draft complaint. I understand that Steve is preparing the draft objection letter. InIe need to file the objections before September L4 and indicate that additional supporting data will be submitted. I have spoken with Eddie Williams and with Armand Derfner. Armand is Erying to identify a historian for us. He has indicated that the Joint Center may be able to assist financially in covering the cost for the study. I am to meet with Armand again in the near future and will advise. The Lawyers' Conrnittee has expressed an interest in the case. I have forwarded a copy of the draft complaint to them. The Lawyers' Conrnittee has the experience from the Virginia case and may be of help to us. JLC:md Enclosures Since 1y yours, onne Chambers