Argument Form

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 088011ad-d692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Argument Form, 1985. 088011ad-d692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/74cbfb3b-0827-4302-a6a5-4f902f994f39/argument-form. Accessed October 31, 2025.

Copied!

    o
ARGUMENT FORM

COURT OF THE IINITED STATESST]PREME

TO: "Counsel of Record"

A Plcase complete Parts A, B, C (only if Diaided Aryument grcnted), and D and return immediately to: Sandy Nels€n, Assistant4r 
Clcrk, Supreme Court of the United States, lVashington, D.C. 20t13.

case No.(s). g3-1969

LACY THORNBURG, et aI. RAT,PI{ GTNGT.PS o} :'l
(Petitione(s) 07 Appelant(s )) (Respondent(s) or Appellee(s))

(Petitioner(s ) or Appellant(s )) (Respondent(s) or Appellee(s))

Date of Argument: December 4, 1985

Arguing Counsel: Mr. Julius L. Chambers
(Mut be a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Coun or must have been allowed to argue W hac crce by order of this Coun. t

(heferred Phonetic Pronunciation),

fitle, if any:
(Solicitor General. Attorney General, City Attorney, etc.)

Address: 99 Hudson Street, 16th Floor

City and State: New York, New York r0013zip:

Telephone: 2t2-219-1900

B

Were you appointed by this Court? D Y".

Name of party(ies) whom counsel will argue for:

ENo Allowed to argue pro hac vice?

Aooellee Ralph Ginqles

D Y". Exo

who are members of the Bar of the Supreme Court that arguing counsel wants to haveC Please indicate narnes of Other Counsel
rcated at Counsel Table:

C- Lani Guinier

T.aclio.T Winnar

City / State

City / State

New York / New York

Charlotte, / I[orth Carollna

D Ir IS IMPORTAT{T THAT ALL REQUESTED TNFORMATTON BE SABMTmED TO IS OFF. IYITHOW DELA'-.

Please complete the following only if Divided Argurnent has been Sranted:

Name of party(ies) whom counsel will argue for:

Plcase complete Order and Divigion of Time:

(Name of irst counsel)
Total Minutes:

Total Minutes:
(Name of second counsel)

DATE October 31, 1985 SIGNATURE
(Corinsel record)

l6ml-12-6.t

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Argument Form

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in