Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and Request For Production; Requests for Admission
Public Court Documents
February 11, 1983

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and Request For Production; Requests for Admission, 1983. c2f4b020-d492-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/8dc8007f-b606-4f60-9521-13575a555f27/defendants-response-to-plaintiffs-first-set-of-interrogatories-and-request-for-production-requests-for-admission. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH DIVISION No. 81-803-CIV-5 FILED FEM-11983 J.mCH LDDNARD,CLERK U. S. DISTRICT COURT E. DIST. NO. CAR. RALPH GINGLES, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. RUFUS L. EDMISTEN, et al., Defendants. -and- ALAN V. PUGH, et al., No. 81-1066-CIV—5 Plaintiffs, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I vs. I I JAMES B. HUNT, JR., et al., ) I Defendants. I I -and- ) I JOHN J. CAVANAGH, et al., ) NO. 82-545-CIV-5 I Plaintiffs, ) I vs. I I ALEX K. BROCK, et al., ) I I Defendants. DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO (PUGH) PLAINTIFFS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION; REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION Defendants in the above-entitled action make the following objections to the Pugh Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production; Requests for Admission. -2- Each and every one of the interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admissions (numbers 1 through 39) is objected to on the ground that the Pugh Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production; Requests for Admission were not made within the required time limits. Specifically, said interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admissions were dated January 29, 1983, and received by Defendants on January 31, 1983. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 33, 34, and 36, Defendants have 30 days in which to respond to Plaintiffs' interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admissions, with an additional three days allowed for response after service by mail pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 6(e). On August 16, 1983, counsel for Plaintiffs signed a stipula- tion that all discovery would be completed by the parties to Pugh v. Hunt and Gingles v. Edmisten by March 1, 1983. That stipulation was also signed by counsel for all Defendants on August 9, 1982, and by counsel for the Gingles Plaintiffs on August 9, 1982, and was filed with the court on or before August 29, 1982. Pursuant to Rule 24 of the Local Rules of Practice and Procedure of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, discovery motions and requests must be propounded in time for respondents to have sufficient time to respond prior to the date set for comple- tion of all discovery. Discovery requests mailed on January 29, 1983, are not propounded so as to provide Defendants with 30 days to respond prior to the March 1 stipulated date for completion of discovery. V _3_ For these reasons, Defendants object to each and every one of Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production; Requests for Admissions on the grounds that they are all untimely. Respectfully submitted, this the _ll__ day of February, 1983. RUFUS L. EDMISTEN ATTORNEY GEN ep y Attorney eneral for gal Affairs st Office Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 (919) 733-3377 Norma Harrell Tiare Smiley Assistant Attorneys General John Lassiter Associate Attorney General Jerris Leonard Kathleen Heenan Jerris Leonard & Associates, P.C. 900 17th Street, N.W. Suite 1020 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 872-1095 Attorneys for Defendants CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this day served the fore- going Defendants' Response to (Pugh) Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production; Requests for Admission by placing a copy of same in the United States Post Office, postage prepaid, addressed to: Mr. J. Levonne Chambers Ms. Leslie Winner _ Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Wallas, Adkins & Fuller, P.A. 951 South Independence Boulevard Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 ‘Mr. Jack Greenberg Mr. James M. Nabritt III Ms. Lani Guinier 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Mr. Arthur J. Donaldson Burke, Donaldson, Holshouser & Kenerly 309 North Main Street Salisbury, North Carolina .28144 Mr. Robert N. Hunter, Jr. Attorney at Law Post Office Box 3245 Greensboro, North Carolina 27402 Mr. Hamilton C. HOrton, Jr. Whiting, Horton & Hendrick 450 NCNB Plaza Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101 Mr. Wayne T. Elliot Southeastern Legal Foundation 1800 Century Boulevard, Suite 950 Atlanta, Georgia 30345 This the A/ day of Februar , 1983.