Memorandum and Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for the Entry of Declaratory Judgement and Injunctive Relief
Working File
January 26, 1983
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Memorandum and Order on Plaintiffs' Motion for the Entry of Declaratory Judgement and Injunctive Relief, 1983. 66aef257-d492-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/955d6273-8837-40e7-ac3b-208599b1e9b6/memorandum-and-order-on-plaintiffs-motion-for-the-entry-of-declaratory-judgement-and-injunctive-relief. Accessed November 28, 2025.
Copied!
a
IN THE T'NTTED STATES DISTRTET @TIRT
POR TEE I,TIDDLE DISTRICT OP GBORGI,A
THOMAS1'!'.Y.E DIVISION
CM. ACIION IrO. 75-3,0-tTlOt'tTHOMASVILLE BRA}ICE OF TTIB
NAACP, €t al.,
PlaLntl.ffe
V.
rBolrAs @tliITY, GEORGIA, et
Ilefeadants
)
,
I
I
I
I
"t.rl
,
)
FILEP
,r3:{.1-...}n.#*,.'-"*}r
HE|IoRAIIDUU I}ID ORDER ON PI,ATNTIFPS I
}I(yTIOrg FOR IIRE EIIIHT OP DESI^ARATORY
JUDG}TEI{![ A}ID INJIINqTIITE RSLTEF
!a !,he ca;e abve lderr0if,ie.i 'r;br: FiaintLffs have fiied a
mtlon for declaratoty Judgment rnd lor lnJrrncttrre rellef and
have flled a brlef in aupport of ttre rctlon. tlhe Defendants
have flled a brlef ln opposltlon to the rctJ.on.
In the rcBt recent declsion by ttre Court of Appeals
dealing vlttr thla case tbe natter vas remanded to ttrls Court for
a reevaluatlon of ttre queation of Lntent, the court of Appeals
detenlnlng ttrat tnrt uas txe only re'rrlnlng lgsue ia the caae
rtich had to be deteralned ln favor of tlre Platntiffg to enable
the Plalatlffe to prevall. Borever, tJrc C-ngress has nfr arended
tbc Votlagr Blghte Act of 1965 laclu&lng e rpeclfls rrnesdgrent to
Sactlon 2 of tbat Ast, a2 U.S.C. 51973, detcmJ.nlng ttrat lntent
ls Do longer rcgrrlred to be proved, ln a caae of thia aort. rn
l1ght of thle areadreat to ttre Votlng Rl'ghtg Act and tlre prevlous
JAN 2 61983
il'''ifl
"Eilt
ltl 8!'li!'.fil
il
1l
il
fln6lnga of thia Court rhich bave been afflrmed by ttre Court of
Appeals, lt ls ngul clear that tlre Plalntlf fs are ent,ld,lea to
prevall on ttrelr challenge to the at-larqre Danner of electing
County CorEdssloners ln Itrouras @unty. It lollore that the
Plalntlffs are entitled to the rellef sought.
Consietent s1tlr the foregolng, thi not1on of the
plalntllfs tor ttre entrfr of a declaratorT Jud,gment la granted an<1
the Court hereby dete:cmlnea that the ctrrrent method of electlng
@unty Colo,legloners ln lhonae County ls contaary to federal lau
aa now establLghed. ttrla neana tlrat a ner d:lgtrlct electlon plan
utlllzing no at-latge seata uust be adopted and, a epecial electLon
rqrst be coaducted at anr early date.
It only saprtng to be deterulned hor thls change ls to be
brought about. lthe Plalntiffs ask that the Court devlse a new
election plan and Ln the meantlrc enJoin tlre recently elected
thouas County Coloiaslonera from performLng the functlons of thel'r
office. Ehe Court rculd nuch prefer that ttre solution to this
probleur be brought about by leglslatlve act, and rlth tbe hope that
tJre uecesaarl,, changes nay be brought about ln that fashlon the
@urt rl11 not at ttrls tine grant the Plalntlffer prayers for
lujunctlve rellef. In ttre abgence of a leglslatlve aolutlon lt
u111, of clousse, be necestarl' tor ttre court to grant the inJunctlve
rellef eought.
IT IS SO ORDERED thle 26th day of JanuarT, 1983.
i. nonrnr EltrorI
T'NTTED STASES DISTRI T JUDGE