Gingles v. Edmisten, Pugh v. Hunt, and Cavanagh v. Brock Motion to Consolidate; Envelope to Greenberg
Public Court Documents
May 12, 1982
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Gingles v. Edmisten, Pugh v. Hunt, and Cavanagh v. Brock Motion to Consolidate; Envelope to Greenberg, 1982. b7763f6b-d792-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a323da94-d49e-446b-8951-f5f98fa53892/gingles-v-edmisten-pugh-v-hunt-and-cavanagh-v-brock-motion-to-consolidate-envelope-to-greenberg. Accessed November 29, 2025.
Copied!
L-. r
/.,(i
I
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
RALEIGH DIVISION
trILE:]
UlLl 21e8'z
.,LT's
s;,ft-diiiiT^
RALPH GINGLES, et dl.,
Pla'intiffs,
V.
RUFUS EDMISTEN, etc., et a1',
Defendants.
ALAN V. PUGH, et a] .,
Plajntiffs,
V.
JAMES B. HUNT, JR., etc., €t dl.,
Defendants.
JOHN J. CAVANAGH, et dl.,
P1 aintiffs,
V.
ALEX K, BR0CK, etc., €t al.
Defendants.
cIvrL N0.81-803-CIV-5
) cIVrL N0. 81-1066-CIV-5
)
)
)
CIVIL NO, 82-545.CIV-5
MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
CoME NOtl the defendants in each of the above-entitled actions, and nrove the
court to order a complete consolidation of the above-entitled actions, for all
purposes, pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
In support of the nrot'ion, and as grounds therefor, defendants state:
1, Each of the above entitled act'ions challenges the apportjonment p'lans for
the House of Representatives and Senate of the North Carolina General Assembly,
although plaintiffs John J. Cavanagh, et a1., have challenged only those portions
of the plans insofar as they pertain to Forsyth County,
2. Each act'ion involves common questions of law and fact relating to the enact-
ment of redistricting p'lans for the North Carolina House and Senate in compliance
with the United States Const jtut'ion, the Voting R'ights Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 51973)
and the North Caro'lina Const'itution. Relief, if any, granted to any of the plaintiffs
rel at'ing to legislat'ive apportionment must be consistent,
3. The defendants in each action are essentially the same, although p'laintiffs
John J, Cavanagh, et al., have named only the Execut'ive Director and members of
the North Carolina State Board of Elections as defendants, wtrile plaintiffs Ralph
Gingles, et a1., and Alan V. Pugh, et al., have included as defendants additional
State officers acting in their official capacities.
4. The defendants' defenses to
rel ated.
5. Each action seeks to represent a class
and who seek' rel i ef rvh i ch may be j ncons'i stent '
No prejudice to any party wi'1.1 result from
Consolidat'ion w'i11 avoid multiplic'ity of suits,
thetical judgments, w'i'll save considerable time
and al1 parties, will expedite the presentat'ion
and w'il I be in the f urtherance of justice '
each action are the same orinseparably inter-
wtrich includes overlapping members
a consolidation of said actions.
w'i1l avo'id confl'icting or ant'i-
and expense for the court, counse'l ,
of evidence at trial Proceedings,
Ral ei gh , North Carol 'i na 27 602
Telephone: (919) 733-3377
Norma Harrel I
Ti are B. Smi 1ey
Assistant AttorneYs General
John Lass'iter
Associ ate AttorneY General
Jerri s Leonard
Kathleen Heenan
Jerris Leonard & Associates, P'C.
900 17th Street, N.W.
Su'ite 1020
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone z (202) 872-1095
Attorneys for Defendants
Respectfully submitted, this the /) day of May, 1982'
RUFUS L. EDMISTEN
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Attorney General
Legal Affairs
. Department of Justice
st Office Box 629
-2-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing Motion to Consolidate
upon plaintiffs, Attorneys by placing a copy of same in the United States Post
Office, postage prepaid, addressed to:
J, Levonne Chambers
Leslie tJinner
Chambers , Ferguson, l'latt, Wal 1 as,
Adkins & Fuller, P.A.
951 South IndePendence Boulevard
Charl otte, t'lorth Caro'l i na 28202
Jack Greenberg
James M. Nabrit, III
Lani Guinier
L0 Columbus C'ircle
New York, l{ew York 10019
Arthur J. Donaldson
Burke, Donaldson, Holshouser & Kenerly
309 North Ma'in Street
Sal 'i sbury, North Carol i na 28L44
Robert N. Hunter, Jr.
Attorney at Law
Post Office Box 3245
201 }Jest Market Street
Greensboro, t'lorth Carol 'ina 27 402
Hamilton C. Horton, Jr,
t,lh 'i t i ng , Horton and Hendr i c k
450 NCNB Pl aza
l{i nston-Sa'lem, llorth Carol i na 27L0t
Wayne T. E'l I i ot, Esq.
Southeastern Legal Foundation
1800 Century Boulevard, Suite 950
Ihis the /L day of
-3-
Ftfre at Frtth Outsli#
prynrtrnaf ol
-iurii.."
?.6. bx
'.29
RALEIGI{ 22CO2
Jack Greenberg
James M. Nabrit, III
Lani Guinier
10 Columbus Circle
New York, NY 10019