Motion Concerning Further Proceedings

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorney
- Leslie J. Winner
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 7c7e12cc-d692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Motion Concerning Further Proceedings, 1986. 7c7e12cc-d692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a5839402-f174-4ea7-b77c-24dbf45363b6/motion-concerning-further-proceedings. Accessed May 22, 2025.

Copied!

    IN THE UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF' NORTH CAROLINA

RALEIGH DIVISION
NO. B1-803-Crv-5

RALPH GINGLES, et dI.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LACY H. THORNBURG, Attorney
General, €t dI.,

Defendants.

MOTION CONCERNING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

This action is before this court on remand for action
consistent with the Opinion and Judgment of the Supreme Court of
the United States. Plaintiffs, with consent of defendants, move

that this court novr take the forlowing actions in light of the
Supreme Court's judgment:

1. Pursuant to Order of the Supreme Court, this action has

been remanded for reconsideration of this Court's determination
concerning Durham County, House District #23. plaintiffs do not
wish to present further evidence or argument concerning their
claims as to Durham County at this time. Plaintiffs therefore
move that the order and Judgment of January 27, 1984, be vacated

only insofar as it concerns House District #23, and that
plaintiffs' claims with regard to House District #23 be dismissed

without prejudice to plaintiffs' ability to renew these claims in
right of the circumst-ances of the future operation of the at
large method of election in Durham county or in right of other
material changes in circumstances.



2. Paragraph 4 of the Order of January 27, 1984, deferred
the award of costs and attorneys fees as prayed by plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs nc,\^r request that the Court establish a schedule for
determining plaintiffs' entitlement to attorneys' fees and costs
and specifically t"q,r"=i that plaintiffs and plaintiff-intervenors
have untir December r, 1986, to fire a petition for award of fees

and costs.

This ? U", of September, 1986.

WE CONSENT:

.Tames M. WaIIace, Jr.

Respectfully submitted,

73O East Independence plaza
951 South Independence Boulevard
C'harlotte, North Carolina 29202
(7O4) gts-8461
Attorney for Plaintiffs

Assistant Attorney General
Post Office Box 1166
Raleigh, NC 27602

Attorney for Defendants

Ferguson, -Stein, Watt, WaIlas
& Adkins, P.A.

-2-



CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I have served the foregoing Motion Concerning

Further Proceedings on all other parties by pracing a copy

thereof enclosed in a postage prepaid properly addressed wrapper

in a post office or official depository under the exclusive care

and custody of the united states postar service, addressed to:

Mr. C. Allen Foster
Foster, Conner, Robson & Gumbiner, p.A.
Post Office Drawer 2OOO4
I04 North EIm Street
Greensboro, North Carolina 2742O

This the q day of September, 1986.

LesIie

-3-



oo

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Motion Concerning Further Proceedings

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorney

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in