Attorney Notes Pages 1578-1579, 1606-1607, 1609-1610

Annotated Secondary Research
January 1, 1982

Cite this item

Attorney Notes Pages 1578-1579, 1606-1607, 1609-1610 preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Date is approximate.

LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorney
- Leslie J. Winner
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Creator
- Lani Guinier
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 625a54f0-e092-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Attorney Notes Pages 1578-1579, 1606-1607, 1609-1610, 1982. 625a54f0-e092-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/a75f4fe8-fabf-41f1-b629-9a5df19edb5a/attorney-notes-pages-1578-1579-1606-1607-1609-1610. Accessed July 20, 2025.

Copied!

    t-s2y- z**fu^r/"Y.
a The propoeed revisioo of I 2 doel not Purport to mandate

system of proportional repreaenEation; indeed' it appears to

1579

explicitly reject any such notion' We underatand that in

teeEimony before thig eubcoooittee' boEh the eponeore and

supporEer8 of thia legislacion have disavor,ed any intention to

implement auch a syoten' A revierr of current lert and the proposed

changes will ehow, however' that the reeult may neverEheless be

Ehesame.Itiedifficulttoquancifythatriek'butevenifonly

niniual, we believe thaE there ie no reaaon to run thet risk at

alL, particularly eince ic is posaible to elioinate the risk

wiEhout uodermining the ProEection nhich ehould be afforded to the

effective exerciee of the franchiae'

There appears to be a general conaenaua thet the Voting

Rights AcE should not require proportional rePreseotetion' There

ia, however, a good deal of dieagreeent over shether the Present

language of S' 1992 is eufficient to insure that the courta do noE

impleoenE such a requirerent' tJe believe EhaE the present

language ie not as clesr aa it could be' and that the legislaEive

hietoryinthellougedoesnotclearuptheseprobleme.onEhe

oEher hand, we believe thaE an inlenE requireoenE' particularly in

the foro of a requirenent thet a "emoking gun" be ehown' ia not

neces8ary Eo inaure that the Act doeE not require proportional

rePreaentation, and iodeed' sould unneceeearily pertit

juriadictiona to escaPe liability for discrioinatory electorel

echemea. O

DrlBv-iaK 1je6
o some havc crPr'3t'd th' conc'rn that this lcgislati'on night

creatc a rlght to prolprtlonal rcPresentation by race or a racial guota

6yEtem. But the Plain worda of the Protpacd Scction 2 MendmeDt state:

The fact that rrb'r' of ' 
dtrortty grouP have

1607

not been elected in nunbers eqPal'to thc ErouP's

fiopolt:.o"-i! rik.;:;[',:li:l;;:]'.;;:' =::.::i."'itself, con

I am convinccd that this statutory language ls Eufficient to disPel any

inplication that the "retult'n standard could bc interpreted to create

a right to ProPortional r'Pr'3'nt'tion by tt":,.ot t::'.tt. n*t""'-t 
.

Lbq
OSenator Kpxrrov. Onc can, I thinlt, easily get mrred down rn or
scune law review debati ebout past cases. Of course, there is an

l6to

overr*'helming tr-ack reco.rd ""g:1-!!:^White 
v' Regester standard

o'hinh our bill adopts' It is a reassurrng. o''".b,9"?"-=:t.:l:Y:.-'*li3:f ,:;";,Irilfi ::1h:fr "i."'-;;;;;i,_sof:,bf "3:-':l,,il:1i.'*::ITrrS:L"}i ;'";ffi i;; ?*iffi-il,i,-il"t -ii 
seems that the rear

-.-^^+i^- I'ornro ,," ,:';'^;;i'ri.li.i'-tt"ice Congress will make nowrE no quota t'"'"*,."ri^rrli'*1;;i;ti''oi"f congress will make now
question -before us t
dn-d for tbe-.future.o

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Attorney Notes Pages 1578-1579, 1606-1607, 1609-1610

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorney

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in