Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae

Public Court Documents
April 1, 1984

Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae preview

Date is approximate.

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Request for Extension of Time to Comply with Order on Discovery, 1981. d29de0c9-d892-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e1a24f7a-dfbf-4f86-a8eb-76c82821e065/request-for-extension-of-time-to-comply-with-order-on-discovery. Accessed May 22, 2025.

    Copied!

    O+r*

EASTERN

RALPH GINGLES, €t al.
P1a

v.

RUFUS L. EDMISTEN, €I

Def

Pursuant to Rule

plaintiffs, through t
attorney, jointly req

29, 1981 Order on Dis

the amount of time r
to October 30, 1981.

Assembly of the State

convene on October 29

subject of this actio
of the Eime needed fo

This #tr+. d

)ou

UNI
IN THE

STATES DISTRICT
FOR THE

TII,EI]
0()1.e 1 i"q6l

-,. lilCi-l I t.i r',14;,i,, (-.f i 1i;;
(.J. ::1, L)l:r I lil(j t ()i )Uii r.

L. Llll, r . l\(). (.Alr.

COURT

CAROLINAISTRICT OF NORTH
MLEIGH DIVISION
NO. 81-803-Crv-5

ntiffs,
REQUEST rOR EXTENSToN 0F

TIME TO COMPLY WITH
ORDER ON DISCOVERY

al. ,

ndants.

6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil procedure,

ir attorney, and defendants through their
st that the time set out in the September

overy by which counsel must stipulate concerning

uired for discovery in this action be extended

The parties make this request because the General

of North Carolina has indicated that it will
1981 to amend two of the statutes which are the

, and counsel will have a more realistic estimate
discovery after the General Assembly acts.
of October, 1981.

Suite 730
951 South Independence Boulevard
Charlotte, North CaroLina 28202
7041 375-846L

Attorney for Plaintiffs

v

Raleigh, North Carolina
9L9 / 733-3377

0ffice
27602

Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Wallas,
Adkins & Fuller, p.A.

S I^IALLACE, JR.
/ Attorney Gener { st Office Box 62Y

Attorney for Defendants



c{u

UNITE

EASTERN

MLPH GINGLES, €t al.
P1a

v.

RUFUS L. EDMISIEN, €I

Def

Pursuant to Rule

plaintiffs, through t
attorney, jointly req

29, 1981 Order on Dis

the amount of time re
to 0ctober 30, 1981.

Assembly of the State

convene on October 29

subject of this acti
of the time needed fo

This #tr4:, d

Jo#

IN THE
STATES DISTRICT

FOR THE
ISTRICT OF NORTH
MLEIGH DIVISION
NO. 81-803-Crv-5

ntiffs,
REQUEST FOR EXTENSTON OF

TIME TO COI{PLY WITH
ORDER ON DISCO\IERY

al. ,

ndants.

6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil procedure,

eir attorney, and defendants through their
st Lhat the time set out in the September

overy by which counsel must stipulate concerning

uired for discovery in this action be exEended

The parties make this request because the General

of North Carolina has indicated that it will
1981 to amend two of the statutes which are the

, and counsel will have a more realistic estimate

discovery after the General Assembly acts.
of October, 1981.

suire 730
951 South Independence Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
704/ 37s-8461

Attorney for Plaintiffs

v

leigh, North Carolina

Office

27602
9L9 / 733-3377

Attorney for Defendants

COURT

CAROLINA

S WALI,ACE, JR.
Attorney Gener{ s

t Office Box 62

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top