Plaintiff s' Preliminary Response to Defendants' Submission; Motion for Leave to Take Depositions; and Request for Evidentiary Hearing

    RALPH GINGLES, et a1.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

RUFUS L. EDMISTEN, et al.

Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF' NORTH CAROLTNA

RALEIGH DIVISION
No.81-803-Civ-5

PLAINTIFFS I PRELIMINARY RESPONSE
TO DEFENDANTSI SUBMISSION; I{OTION
FOR LEAVE TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS; AND
REQUEST FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING

I. Prelimina Re nse to Defendants' Submission

Plaintiffs respond to defendants' March 72, 1984, Motion and

Submission pursuant to the Courtrs Order and Judgment of January

27, 1984r ds follows:

A. Defendants have not demonstrated that they have completely

remedied the violati-ons of 52.

Having found defendants in violation of the mandate of 52 of
the voting Rights Act, of 1965r ds amended, 42 u.s.c. 51973, the

Court deferred further action to al1ow defendants an opportunity
to redistrict in compliance with 52 and "to assess the amended

statute's substantial new requirements for affirmatively avoiding
racial vote dilution rather than merely avoiding its intentional-
imposition." Mem. Op. at 70.

Defendants have the burden of demonstrating that their pro-
posed new districts adequately remedy the 52 violati_on found by

the court. This burden is required by the basic principles of
equity adopted by congress in amending 52. As the legislative
history makes clear, the relief should be fashioned so that "it



completely remedies the prior dilution of minority voting strength
and fu11y provides equal opportunities for minority citizens to
participate and to elect candidates of their choice. " senate

Report at 31. Defendants' Motj-on for approval of their substitute
plan must, therefore, be denied unless and until defendants demon-

strate that those plans completely remedy the violation found by

the Court and fu11y provide bl-ack voters in North Carolina an equal

opportunity to participate and to elect candidates of their choice.

Defendants have not demonstrated the absence of discrimi-
natory purpose and result in the proposed districts.

Plaintiffs preliminary examination of defendants' submission

reveals that defendants have failed to meet their obligation at
the remedial stage of this lawsuit. Examples are as follows:

(1) Defendants failed to demonstrate that they avoided dilution
of minority voting strength in districts which do not have effective
black voting majorities but do have recognizable and substantial
concentrations of black voters. These include in particular House

District No. 8, a three member distrj-ct composed of parts of
wilson, Edgecombe and Nash counties, and House Districts 36 and

54-60, which district Mecklenburg County.

(2) Defendants have failed to demonstrate the absence of
discrj-minatory purpose and discriminatory result in their combina-

tion of multi-member and sj-ngle-member districts, particularly in
the division of former House District No. B (wi1son, Edgecombe

and Nash counties) into proposed House Districts Nos. B and 70.

Defendants have further failed to show the absence of discriminatory
purpose and result in the contorted configuration of the Mecklenburg

-2-



n%fl,^W*Pfn?u
A*1do >e^q

' l/1.v

.- ^A,iltu^l^^ ^'6
>ruO/ lAA4a#

,fu'r*b ,r,n L&^ L U*t, 
"1"-/'4',off?^o*ffi

/, /L,1 
14";

'. ^^nf, U

l'1*, -l/,,.,)r^ W 59. to aar^
11 Q-^l-ui qb ' d(4,, o



,n ^. 6 03'17 I 7>3
Area Godc Extcnrion

IELEPHONEO

CALLEOTO SEE YT]U WILLC/ALLAEAIN

WANTSIOSEEYI]U

RETUFNEOYOUR CALL

5r ?#,!ilB,,,



county House Districts (Nos. 36 and 54-60). These districts
severely fracture communities of interest and are so irregularly
shaped that voters will not be able to learn in which district
they live in order to use their votes effectively.

(3) Defendants have failed to demonstrate that the plans

they submitted are based on any rational or objective criteria
other than the need to protect white incumbents.

Because of the deficiencies noted above, plaintiffs are

particularly concerned about defendants' failure to completely

remedy the violations of 52 in the redistricting of former House

Districts Nos. 8 and 36. Plaintiffsr preliminary examination

does not reveal substantial problems in proposed House Districts
Nos. 2L and 55-61 (Wake County), 23, 68-69 (Durham County), or

39, 66 and 67 (Forsyth County) , or in proposed Senate Districts
l, 2, 6, 9, 10, 11 and L4 (Northeast Senate Districts), or 22 and

33-35 (Mecklenburq and Cabarrus Counties).

II. Motion for Leave to Take Depositions

rn order to be able adequately to present to the court evi-
dence of the failure of proposed House Districts, particularly
Nos. 8,70,36, and 54-60, to remedy the violations found by the

Court, plaintiffs reguest leave to take the depositions of legisla-
tors and legislative staff members directly involved in developing

those districting proposals. Plaintiffs further request leave to
take depositions in lieu of testimony of witnesses who live outside
the subpoena jurisdiction of the court pursuant to Rul-e 45 (e) (1),

F. R. Civ. P.

-3-



III. Request for Evidentiary Hearing

Pursuant to Rule 43 (e) , F.R.Civ.p., plaintiffs request

that the Court schedule defendants' Motion for an Evidentiary
Hearing, to be heard on oral testimony and deposition, to
provide the court and plaintiffs an opportunity to assess the

adequacy of defendants' proposed remedy. plaintiffs further
request that the Court set a schedule for briefing of this Motion.

IV. The Court Should Order Complete Relief.
In the event that the Court concludes on the current

record that the plans submitted by defendants to not completly

remedy the viorations of 52, plaintiffs request that the court
order defendants to hold elections in former House District No. 8

i-n accordance with Exhibit 93 (H400 N54) and in former House

District No. 36 in accordance with Exhibj-t 94 lH4O0 N75) or Exhibit
9s (H400 N90 ) .

Each of these proposals was submitted to the North Carolina
General Assembry in the House Redistricting committee and on

the floor of the House of Representatives but was rejected.
Plaintiffs submit that each of these plans would completely

remedy the 52 vioJations found by the court and would provide

brack voters in these districts an equal opportunity to partici-
pate in the poritical process and to elect representatives of
their choice.

This lf day of t/\d*rA

-4-

, 7984.



Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Wa11as
& Adkins, P.A.

Suite 730 East Independence P:.aza
951 South Independence Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
704/37s-846r

JACK GREENBERG
LANI GUINIER
99 Hudson Street
16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
2t2/2L9-1900

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

-5-



CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I have served the foregoing PLAINTIFFS '

PRELIMINARY RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' SUBMISSION; MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS; AND REQUEST FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING

on all other parties by placing a copy thereof in the post

office or official depository in the care and custody of the

United States Postal Service addressd to:

James Wal1ace, Jr. \ , -Deputy Attorney General for ) D"/ 4P*
North Carolina Department of \Justice \ /;*Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 ) J

Arthur Donaldson
Burke, Donaldson, Holshouser &

Kenerly
309 N. Main Street
Salisbury, North Carolina 28154

Kathleen Heenan McGuan
Jerris Leonard & Associates, pA
900 l-7th Street, N.W., Suite 1020
Washington, D.C. 20006

Robert N. Hunter, Jr.
201 West Market Street
Post Office Box 3245
Greensboro, North Carolina 27402

This ltl day of rn a^J= 1984.

-5-



SOLID LINES = 1980 CENSUS TMCT B0${DARIES

BROKEN LINES = 1980 TOWNSHIP BOITNDARIES

NASH COLIITY

B,.,^cK ?olt' LATro D ?aaceru IAC{S

Dtsr.
brsf .

brsT.
Lrs(.

51 = CC .o'/.
g G t(8'3'A

55 z ao.?'/.

EDGECO}AE COUNfi

lotlL srltg POPULlttoi
Sltro o? arcnEs? to Lorgs?
i0tBEB or lBdSEES
IYEEAGE POPULIfIOH PER TzI8EB
dIXIdUT COiTBOLLIXG PEBCEITAGE
NAHGE OP DEYIATIOX PBOT XCEll
OTERILL STIGE
IVBSTGE DEYIIIIOI PIE IEiBSB
STITDIED DEVIATIOI

tBrrL Drstrlct pLtr - Eogsu (Hq00I5.l
rr. s{tttlnr sll!!stlcs

= $,$$tr765
= l. l0tB
= 120
= 09r0t5
= tl9. 2511
= -q. 99 ?9 ?o r. 6706
= 9.6685
= 3.2152
= l- l?13

g|rL
Fz
-tr

Dr sTRtc-T
8

\
t
t-'- --t,

,
I

bISrRteT
56

-{90%

DrsrRrcfe{

>rsftc( 55

FbpR
S3dGtu€
ftgnge'
DrsnRtcT3

WILSON COUNTY



f..
TEItt DrSfErC? PLli - EOUSE (Ell00i50)

LTSI OF ETTITIES Bt DISTBIC? CIIE POPI'LITIOTS

DISfPoP = POPgLlfIo[ OP tEB DrSfBIqf
8EL DEY = EELITIYE DEVIArIOT

BLICf,_P=PEBCEI? BLICKS Ir DISTBICT
II|DIAf,_P=PBBCETI IIDIATS Itr DISTRICT

POP = POP0LATIOU OP I COUTTI' TO8IISEIP, ETC. -

DISI

I

IETBENS DISTPOP

It6 r 565

BBL_DEY BLICT-P TXDITT-P

-t.9979 48. 3 0. 
'

Ertrtr

EDGBCOIBE COUttt
rP 1 TTBB TR 2O8P
aP I TAnE tB 209
TP I IABB T8 2IO
IP 1 IABB IB 2II
rP I rtnB tR 272
rP I tlBB rR 2t3P
TP I T CII TB 213P
TOTTSEIP 2, LOrEB COXE
foExsEIP 3, UPPEB COrE
TOTTSEIP O, DEEP CNEEf,
TOTTSEIP 5, LOTEB PISH
IOTTSEIP 6, OPPER FISE
STIFT C8 TB 2O6P
IP 8 SPTRT TB 2I3P
TP 8 SPIRT T8 2I6P
torilsElP 9, oTTEB CnEE
IOTBSEIP 10, LC'IEn ?Or
TOETSEIP tl, 8ILIUI CR
RI' TIP TB-2I3P
IOCTSETP t3, COffErglc TrP ED-1222
IIT.C TTP ED-1225

XASE COUTTY
CISTALIN TOTf,SEIP
GBIT TTP IB I O8P
6BTF TflP TB IO9P
rlrr ?rP rB t09P
xrsB ltP rR t08P
las8 lIP rB l09P
r r8r? frP T8 t07P
r TEIT ITP TB IOSP
8ED OIf, TOTNSEIP
S TEIT TEP ED 9?2
S SEIT TTP TB ?O?P
s rErr tlIP 'ra l08P
STOUT CBK TCP IOTP
STOTI CBK TTP TOSP

EDGBCOIBE COOiTI
srrr8 cB rn 205
8f, Crr aI,P-201
B[ Crr tl,*202p
BT CTI TTP-203P
8t cft tBF-20ltP
BI lTP IB-202P
8r rrP rB-203P
ru rrP rn-200P

POP

3t,892
t86

3' lltl I
3,88 8
3.132
3.962

380
l7

l,'t 29
953
986

t, f43
t,781
2,571

782
6S3

1,831
3,253
1,2f0
t, llto
1.267

1t
308

11,673
1.328

87
2. lq4

3r3
293
32t

l, 599
896

1.773
t0

1,316
652
3s0
577

21.095
636
r0t

5,035
4,57 6
6,065

908
588
752

50 6.570 -t.9877 66.0 0.t



DIS? EBIBEBS DISTPOP BSL-DEv 8I,ACf, P t TDIT ;- P

INTIL DISTRICT PLIf, - EorrsB (8{00E5tl

ET?IfI

ststtocl torisErP
SPEI'GBILL ?OCTSETP
sttrTo[s ED-?49r
s?ax?olls BD-750r
sTtrTors ED 7508
STAXIOIS BD-751
sIlDrolts ED 752
IAILOE a TICSEIP
?olsrot ?P ED ?00
rIL50X TtP ED-'|27
rrlsox ,TrP ED-728e
TILSON TCP ED 728C
TILSOf, TCP BD-729r
TILSOU TTP ED 729C
TTLSOII TSP ED 7298
rrLsor tBP ED 729n
TILSOT T3P ED-730
flILSOII TBP ED-73, T
TILSOX TIP ED 73IC
crLsof, t8P ED 732r
IILSOU TIP 8D-732C
TILSOT TTP ED 732D
IILSO' T19 ED 7328
TILSOD TTP ED-733
TILSOT TIP ED 73q
rrlsotr f3P BD 735
TILSOX TTP ED-736C
TILSOII TSP ED 736G
TILSOf, TIP ED 736J
gILSON TTP 8D 736L
TILSOT TTP 8D.737
TILSOI TTP ED-7387
TILSOX TTP ED 739C
TILSOI TTP ED-?[O
TTLSOT TgP ED 7668
TTLSOT CTT TIP.I
TILSOf, Clr rrP-3
TILS CTT OP-DGIP
IrLS Cfr IP-EG2
3ILS Car fP-BLq0l
trLsoi ct 4P Bl.tto2
IILS Crl tP-Er,rto3
trl.s cfr lP-BL.toc
IILS CTT qP-BLIO5
:rl,s ctr 0P-8L406
CILS CIT qP.BLOOT
IILS Crr gP-8L008
TILS CTT OP-BLOOg
IILS CrI lrP-BLt t2
trls crt iP-BLf13
iILS Crr lF-BLltrt
IILS CTT qP-BL415
TILS CTI {P-BLq 16
SrLS Ctl |P-BL017
IILS err tFBLrrtS

POP

2.192
2.064

920
6t0

0
90

0
2,328

t8f
f { t
791

0
256

0
0
0
2
2
0
0
t
0
0
2
0
0
6
0
0
0
t

771
0

2t5
0

llr 589
2,562
7.62a
t, 5t0

305
0

32
69
l5
I

77
68

i55
6t
62
t6
to
r6
r9
32



*.k District 3,,,36 - lvieckletrbut g

8 Members

% Bhck \bter Begislratirxr by PtEcincts

-t

f*'- l65%andoverL*J

-L-
2-

jority BIa SlngLe-

6t.62 E\

QD,,
tq,s?"

57
4 ,37" 67

rDi ict s

tt.g7" 
gt Populatlon

Population

of Elected

o4 ,22 st .

,>5

\"o2 sl

e9
Ll ,12, gl

66.1X gYack
7t.Z'lfrLack

sldenc

: PIAINTIFF,S

I WBfil*Ee RR ? t#7)
I,L 7, BI



a

c

o

o

,r!,

n

37

38

t
I

o

,

o

o

o

o

ftr

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

q
o

o

o

o

G

e

e

e

e

I.
fRIAL 0ISIPICT PLAI\ - HOUSE (P{00!1751

LIST OF EAIIIIES 8Y DISIRICI TTIIH PCPUTAIICAS

DISIPOP = P0PULATI0N CF fHE EtSTRICT
REt CEV = RELATM DEVIAITCN

ELACX P=PERCENT SLACfS Il( 0ISIRICI
It\0IAN P=PERCEtII TNCIANS IN 0ISIRtCI

POP = P0PUTAIICN OF ! CCUiIY' TOhNSHIP'

t9 55 !{ONCAT, trFch 5 r 1984 l2

OT
4l

DTST

34

35

36

t,EltEERS DISTPOP

zgt 1792

99 r 186

50r299

2

I

4.4543

1,. t798

2-62C2

14. 5

t5. ?

64.2

[0. I

3.6

REL DEV 8I,ACT P IATIAA P

EIC.

ET\IITY

C'8ARFI,S COUNIY
SIlhLY CCUhIY
Ut\l0N CCUNIY

FChAt\ CCUtiIY

l{tCKLEl.SLFG C0tNIY
CHARTCIIE IhP-TI
cFAFtClrE IhP-I2
CHAFLOITE I}P-I6
CHARLCI IE IhP-23
CH'FLCIIE IbP-24
CHARTCIIE IhP-25
CHART€IIE ThP-3I
CHIFTCIIE IhP-4C
CHARTCIIE T5P-4I
CHARLCIIE ThP-54
CHARTCI IE IhF-80
CHARLCII€ IIP-8I

D!VIDSCN CCUNIY
D'VIE CCTNIY
IRECELL CCUI\IY

TAGLE I'ILtS IOTNSHIP
UN I0t\ GRCVE lCht\ Sli IP

R'NDCLFI. CC[NII
8!CX CFEEX IC}NS'-IP
eRch ER tchNst- tP
CEDAF GRCVE.TChASHIP
ccr(ccF0 Ich^sHIP
GP!hI IOhNSHTP
I-EVEt CRCSS IChNSHIP
t\Elr PCPE TOhNSHIP
t\Eh IARKEI IChNSI-IP
PLErS!t\I CR0\,E IChASPI
FIChtANC I0htl SHIP
TABERNICTE IThftSI-IP
IRIAIIY IChilSHIP

o.2

c.2

0.1

o.2

o.4

PCP

85 r895
4e.5tt
?cr3gc

99r186

,c,299
' 3 r305

5r601
1 tl52
3r913
4.L55
3r€46
5t787
6 t142j 1439
3 t924
3 t449
2 t982

ll:irt62
2tt,599
2 t969
I t557
I t4L2

47r80?
2t799
lrll4
crcSg
lt219
2 t545
2 t496

8{9
5 r54C

516
2 t413
2 t433

lE t 245

1.40'730 -4.294t

47 t6O7 -2.4640

a

e

o

rio

,



'c

{

t

n

o

o

o

a

a

a

o

o

a

o

e

a

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

a

a

5t

52

53

54

rRIAL OISIRICI PLAN - HOUSE (H4OO!{75I
I. LIST CF ENIIIIES 8Y DTSIRICI TIIH PCPLTAIIENS

DISIPOP - POPULAIIOh CF IHE CISIRICI
REL CEV = RELAIM DEVIAIION

ELACK P=PERCEilT ELrCrS lN 0IStRICI
INDIAN P=PERCEAf IN0IANS IN EISTRICI

POP = POPULAIICN OF A CCUNTYT tOhtrSHIP, E

1,9 5' ilCACAY, trrFCt 5r 1984 l8

q

ol
0r sr

50

rEilEERS PCP

5C t655
5t2)e
2.7L1
2 tL58
2.149

3Lr525
tt274

l(0 r934
1 1925
lr77l
6tL54

21 r 417

I t643
s0?
ti6

46,495
25r8tt
16r827
lCr28,2

t8,933
c ,619
5t574
5t574

2Crt?8

t 1 r353
3r578
4r781
(r5ll
5r681
2 t953
6t122
2 t963
4 r347
3r68€
C t924

OISTPOP

50 r 655

192 t27 6 -1.9295

lOlrC59 3- 090 5

51r304 4.6706

5L t351 4 -77 06

REt OEY ELACK P IACIAN P

IC.

ENIITY

HENDESSCA CCUN IY
EtLE .F IDCE ICINS}IP
CLEAs CREEK IChIiSF TP

EONEYVILLE IChNShIP
CRTEN FIVER IChNSHIP
PEt\[ERSCnVIItE Itht\SF I
PITLS RITER IChASHIP

BUhCCPET CCUNIY
Htn0EFStt\ C0lNIl

CRAB CFEEK IChNSFIP
FCOPEFS CFEEX IChNSH IP

IRANSYL!!NI' CGUNIY

GF!H'P CCUA IY
S I ECCAI- ICht\ 5l I F
YEI.LCh CPEEI( IC}NSHIP

HAYT(CC CCLNIY
JTCKSCi CCtt\IY
ilnD I SCh C0UitI Y

slAIlt ccuilIY

CI. IRCXIE CCLNIY
CL!Y CCUNIY
GRAH!I CIUAIY

CHEC!H IChTiSP I P

l{ACOt\ CCUhIY

HECKLENEURG CCUNIY
CHAFTCI IE IhP.I3
CHIPLCIIE IhP-I4
CF!RLCIIE IhP-2C
CHAFTCIIE IhP-2?
CHIRLCI IE ThP-30
CHAFTCI IE IhP-42
CH!RtCIIE I}P-55
cirARtcl IE IIP-56
cHrRt cl r€ rlP-6c
CT1'FTCIIE IhP-82

3.3465 3.8 0. I

!

,l

fi

t

o

o

e

o

n

t

t

C

c.

8.0 0-2

t.5 5.0

1.6 t.2

65-6 0.3

a



o

a

o'

a

O

o

o

o

c

a

,la

,.

,l

t

e

o

56

0

0

o

o

o

o

e

o

ti

o

o

o

a

Q

4

,t

IR IAL 0ISIR tCT PLAI\ - HoUSE I 114OoN75l
T. TISI OF ENIIIIES BY DTSIFICI TIIH PCPUI-AII(NS

DISIPCP = PCPULAT tON tF IHE C ISfR ICt
PEL OEV = RELIIM DEVIAIION

ELACK P=PERCENf BIaCKS IN DISIRICf
IN0IAN P=PERCEhI INCM\S tN CISTR ICI

POP = POPULATICN 0F A CCUftIy, tOhNSHtp, EfC.

t9 55 FCITCAY, t APCt 5, 1984 l9

DT ST

54

55

I'EMBERS OI STPOP

5l t351

49 t264

RET DEV BI-ACK P II\CIAA P EAIIIY

ICAG CNTEK PCI-2

t{tcxtEdeuFG cct AIY
CH!RTCIIE IhP-22
CHAFTCIIE IhP.39
CHAFI.OIIE IrP-52
CHARTIIIE ThP-53
CHAFTCIIE IhP-58
CHARTCIIE IhP-59
CIlAFLCIIE IhP-7?
(HARI-CIIE IhP-78
SERRYI-ILL PCI
STE€L CFEEK PCI-I

l,lECxLEiEURG CCtt\IY
CH!FTCIIE IhP-4
CFAFLCIIE ThP-79
CH'RLCITE ThP-89
CORNET IUS PCI
CRAB CRCI.'RC PCI-I
CRAB CBCFIRO PCI.2
cAv Icsct\ PCI
hUNIERSVITLE PCT
I.EFLY FC I
tcAG cPEEx P(r-l
PALI,ARO CREEX PCI_I
PATI-ARO CFEEK PCI-2
CAKOTLL FCI
PAh CREEK PCT-I
PAh CREEK PCI-2

4-7706

0.5086

6 5.6

46.0

I1.3

0.3

G.4

0-3

PCP

3 
' 803

45 r2e4
5,3(l
5 t429
4 t993
q t794'e tll2
2 tl9S
7r89C
5 t496
2t129
J? 1618

48r931
3 t0e2
I r969
2,l0l
3r0Cl
2t641
€rc83
3 t562
3r803
3 t269
3 t44?
3r651
3 t561
3r031
2t613
3r0?9

48 t93L -0.1708 t4

o

o
o



t.
IRIAL 0ISIRICT PLAN - }1OUSE lP400Nr5l

LIST OF ENIIIIES 8Y DISTRTCI TIIH PCPULAITCAS

DISfP0P = P0PULAtI0f\ CF It'E CISIRICT
REL DEV = REtTTIVE DEVIAIICTi

BLACK P=PERcENT EtACKS IN 0ISTRICT
INDIAN P=PERCENT INDIANS IN C ISIR ICT

PGP = POPULAIICN 0F A CCUIII, I0hNSHlPr ETC.

REL OEV BTACK P IACIAN P

19 55 IlCt{CAY r l'APCli 5 r t984 20

'l

.l

o

o

a

o

o

Or

t)

at

dr

o

at

),

1

OT
DIST

5t

I'EHB ER S OI STPOP

5L, L24

50 tl 82

PCP

t t.124
lr?38
5 tlCl
2 r546
? t?95
2 t557
'lr86I
1r869
2 t344
3 tOZC
2t226
2 t924
2 r906
2 tC4l
lr65g
2t512
3rt0?
2 tl91
3r038
2r82e

50 tl 82
2t454
2t6C5
1t851
2t 127
? t494
3r7Il
2 r308
3t824
2o922
2 t6Q4
2 t824
? tlG4
4r270
2 t9lO
5 r{88
lr50c

4-3034

3-6056

4-9 c.4

t.6 0.3

EhTIIY

I{ECKTEhEURG CCLAIY
CHIRI.CIIE IhP. I
CHAFLCIIE I}P-2
CF!RLCIIE IhP-8
CHARLCIIE I}P-9
CHPFTCIIE IhP.IO
CI.IAFLCIIE ThP-T8
CHNRLCIIE IhP-I9
CH!SLCIIE IhP-20
CHAFI.CTIE IhP-2I
CH!RLCI I T I}P-32
CHARI.CIIE IhP.3?
CHARTCIIE IhP.38
CHAFLCTIE ThP-47
CHARLCI IE IhP-48
CHARTCI TE IhP-49
CHIsLOITE ThP-50
CHARLCI IE IhP-5 I
CHARLCIIE T}IP-7I
CHAFTCIIE IhP-74

TIECKLEhBI"RG CCLNIY
CHARTCIIE I}P-36
CHAFLCIIE ITP-5?
cHrFt_clIE IhP-65
CH'RLCIIE IhP-67
CHARTCITE IIP-68
cHASLCl lE lhP-69
CI'AFTCI I E IhP-?O
CHARLCI I E IhP-72
CHAFLCI IE I}P-?3
CHARTCIIE IhP.?5
CH!FLCIIE IhP.76
CHAFLCIIE IhP-86
CHARTCI IE I}P-88
PII\EVltLE PCI
PROV ICENCE PCI
SIEET CFEEK PCI-2

t

I

I)

a

r)

58

r
a

O

t.

t.___

o

o

o

o



o

d}

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

a

a

o

a

C

o

t.

60

IRIIL OISIRICf PLAn - vOUSE (H400t\?51
LISt OF EI,iTIITES BY DISIRICT HIIH PCPUI-AIITNS

DIStP0P = POPULAIIOh tF IHE DISTRICI
REL OEv = REL!rM 0EVIAIICN

SLACX P=PERCEtiT PLACTS IN 0ISIR ICI
Ih0IAN P=PERCEhI INDIANS IN CISTFICI

POP = POPULAIICN CF A CCUI\TYr fOhftSHIPr ETC.

l9 55 t{ONCAY, FAFCF 5r 1984 2t

POP

5Lt224
2 t141
3r581

, l'588
4 t22C
3r8{9
4r147
lr76(
4r5C8
3.493
2 t662
:1 r6l9
5 t39l
5 t251
4r813

tlr293
4.ee5
2tt3S
3.97 g

4 r08C
4 r C8 I
3r885
? t51C
3r722
4 r22e
2r616
! t5l3
3 tE21
3 t503
-2 r2lC

o

ol
rt

0

,

6

t

o

e

(D

o

G

o

o

6

o

c

c

DIST

59

TEHBERS DI SIPOP

5l t224

51t293

RET OEV BLACK P U{CtAt{ P

4.507 4 4.t 0.4

4.6482 14.3 0.5

ENI IIY.

,{ECKTEAELRG COUI\IY
CHARLCIIT IhP-?
CHARLCIIE IhP-34
CHARLCI T E ITP-35
CHARICIIE IhP-62
CHASLCIIE ITP-63
CI.IAFLCIIE IhP-64
CH'RLCIIE IIP.66
CH!RTOIIT IhP_83
CHARLCIIE IhP.85
CLEAF CREEK PCI
PAII}EhS PCI
rIi\I HtLt PCI-t
t{INI l. Itt PCI-2
IORilTAC SIAR PCI

fiTCKtENSLRG CCLTiIY
CH!FTCI IE IhP-3
CH!FI-CIIE IhP.5
CHARI.CIIE IhP-6
CHTFLCI IE IhP-T5
CFARTOIIE IhP-I?
CHARTCIIE IhP-28
CHARTCIIE IhP-29
CF!FTCI IE IhP-3]
CH!FLCI IE IIP-43
CHAFTCI IE IhP-4{
CHAFLCIIC IhP-{5
CHARTCI IE IhP-46
CHARTCIIE I}P-6I
CH!RLCI I E TTP-84

a

G

o

a

o



l-iouse District 36 - fuieckleliburg Uoutriy
54-60 @ ffiwgaers

J ir?p$n
r.jrg (ritr g ,t ,1ri'itvv Ngo

n"1ig

14i,crl\ tl

@
5?- {sotl

fr stfrci(
cfijsIJl

si,.fr"X.frr(*i- rSI:- .r'(Jr:/ 1 {.J.tD i
5 5-,:^14.b t

Ft i'j.'"d.{,
5;-'o,7 Q^
5x- !,6fo

bf
l,It= I

E fr,ql
<il0-l
rl

7r

5 c -: 4, e,rr;
f Abrr11;r€d



l.
l.
l-

o

.f
o

&

]

i

O

o

o

o

a

o

(a37

38

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

c

o
^
o

o

o

o

o

a

o

a

a

I

TRIAT OTSIRICT PLAN - HOUSE IH4OOIIgOI
I. LTST OF EilTTIIES 8Y DISIRTCI }IIIH POPUTAIICNS

OISTPOP = POPULAfION 0F IHE CISTRICt
REt 0EV = RELITIVE DEVIAIION

EtACK P=PERCENf ELACTS IN DISIRICI
INDIAN P=PERCENT INDIANS IN 0ISfRICT

POP - POPULAII0t{ OF A C0UNfYr T0HNSHlpr ErC.

[9 30 TEDNESoAY, I{ARCH 7, l98r t2

OI SI

31

35

36

HEIIEER S

4

DISTPOP

204 r792

99r186

50 r 299

t. 1798 15. ?

REt OEV ELACK P I NIIAI\ P

1.4543 14.5 0.2

ENIIIY

CASARRUS COLNIY
SI!T{LY COUNTY
uluori dcunrv

ROhAN COUNIY

I{ECKLEAEURG COLNTY
CH!FLCIIE IrP-II,
CHARLOIIE TTP-T2
CHARLCITE TTP.16
CHARTOTIE ITP-23
CHARTOII€ T'P-24
CHARTCII E TTP-25
CHARTGIIE ThP-3I
CHARI.OIIE TTP-TO
CHANLOIIE IhP-TI,
CHIRTCITE IhP-54
CHARTCIIE ITP-80
CHARLCIIE ThFsT

Drv I0sf t{ ccuNIY
0rVIE COt/tiIY
TFEDETL C6UNTY

EAGLE 
'{ItTS 

ICT'NSHIP
UNICIT cRCVE rCkhSHIp

R!N00[Pti CCtiilIY
EACK CREEK IChNSHIP
SROIiEF IOhNSHIP
CECAR GROVE IOLNSHIP
CONC6FO 

'OIiNSH 
T P

GRAt\I IIhttSPIP
[EVEL CRCSS TOhNSHIP
NEll l.,rCPE IOLt{SHI P

NEIT FARKEI If,hNSHI P
PLEASAIiI GROVE ICTIIiS}I
RTCHTAND IOhNSHIP
TAEERhACLE IOhNSHt P
IRINITY TOHilSPIP

PCP

85r89'
{8r517
?Cr380

99rle6

50 r 299'3r309
5r601
3t752
3 t913
4tL55
3t846
5t787
6tL42
3 1439
3t924
3 t449
2 t982

ll3, t62
24 t599

2 t969
L t55l
l14l2

47r807
2t799
lrll4
6 r 05 8
1t279
2t545
2 t496

8(9
5 r546

576
2 t4L3
2 r431

18 t249

2.6202

140 
' 

730 -4.294t

64.2 0. I

lo- t o-2

o.2

0.447 tSOl -2.1640 3.6

t o



o

c

o

t

a

a

a

o

o

o

a

O

o

o

o

a

o

a

5l

52

5'

rRIAL DISIRICT PLA'{. HOUSE TH4OON9OI
I. LISI OF ENTIIIES 8Y DTSIRICI TiIIH PCPUTATICilS

DISTP0P = POPULAII0t{ CF fHE CISTRICf
REt 0EV = 8EL!ItVE 0EVIAIION

ELACX PlPT,RCENT SLACKS IN OTSIRICI
IN0IAN P-PERCEttT lNOtlNS lN 0ISIRtCI

POP = P0PULAII0N 0F A CCUifYr f0hNSHIPr ETC.

l9 30 liE0NEs0AYr l,l!RcH 7r 198{ l8

OI ST

50

,tEIIBERS

I
OI S IPOP

50r655 3.3465

L92t276 -1.9295

l0l r059 3.090 5

5l r 304 t.6706

,L 1353 4.7706

REL DEV 8TACX P

3.8

8.0

t-5

1.6

65.6

ENIIIY

HEt\DERSCt\ CCUNIY
ELUE RIOGE IChNSHIP
CLEAR CREEK ICKNSHIP
EONEYVILTE IChNSHI P

GREEN RIVER IGhNSHIP ]

HE'TDERSCIiVILLE IOhNSHI
ilITLS RIVER ICTNSHIP

BUt{CCT8E CCUNIY
HETiDERSOT{ COUNTY

CRAB CREEK IChNSHIP
HCOPERS CREEK IOhNSHIP

TRANSYLYAN IA CCUNTY

GRAH!T CCUiTIY
SI ECOAI. IOhNSHIP
YELLCh CREEK IOhNSHIP

H!Yt 00c c0uttl Y

JACKSCT\ C0UNIY
,{,DISCN COUT{IY
ShA I tt CCUf.tI Y

CFERCTEE CCUNIY
CtAY CCUNIY
GR!HA'.i COUNIY

ct'{ecAH TchNstitP
I,I!CON COUNTY

,{ECKLEiELFG COTNIY
CHARTCITE ITP-T3
CHAFLCIIE IhP-I4
CHARTOIIE IhP-26
CHARTCIIE ThP.2I
CHARTOIIE IIP-30
cHARr-Cf I E IrP-(2
CHAPTCIIE IhP-55
CH!RTGIIE IhP-56
CHARLCIIE IhP-60
CHARLCITE IhP.82

IADIAN P

0.1

o.2

5-O

1.2

0.3

PCP

50 ,655
5 t218.
2tllL
2r158
2t749

1L 1525
6t214

160r934
I .925
lr77l
6rI54

23 14 L7

It643
90?
136

46 r195
25r8ll
l6 t827
10,283

18r933
6r6t9
51574
5t574

20r178

5tr353
3 t5l 8,

4t781
4r5ll
5r681
2t955
Ctl22
2 t963
I t141
5r688
6 t924

.lo
t

a

o

o

o

o

o

o

o

,
C

e

o

o

o

o

0

3

o

o

o

a



a

o

6

I|

o

o

f

o

o

o

o

a

o

o

o

o

I.

56

l^

o

o

fr

e

o

o

o

o

'c

t
,o

,I

'0

TRIAL OTSIRICT PLATi - HOUSE IH4OONgOI
LISI OF ENIIIIES 8Y DISIRICT HIIH POPULAII(NS

0ISTPOP = P0PULATION CF IHE 0ISTRICf
REL DEv = SELAIM DEIIAIION

ELACK P=PERCENI eLACKS lN 0IStRICI
tN0IAN P-PERCENT IN0IANS lN DISIRICT

POP = POPULAfICN OF A C0UhfY' fOhNSHlPr ErC.

REL DEV ELACK P

19 3O IiEDNESOAYT t{aFcH 7r l98t l9

1

,ri

)

e

'l

q

c

o

DI ST

54

55

t{Er{8ER S DTSTPOP

5L.353

5Or99 I

50r l?2

TNCIAN P

0.3

0.4

0-3

PCP

3r803

5C,99 I
2 t55l
5 t14l
5t429
1t993
4t794
CrL75
7r890
5.496
I r969
2t729
3r618

5CtL72
1 t062
3r210
2rl0l
3r001
2t64L
6r083
3 t5tr2
3;803
),269
! 1441
3r651
1 t56t
3r031
2t671
3r0?9

4. r706

4.0 3 20

2.'6LL

65.6

4{.7

I1.6

EIiI I IY

TCNG CREEK PCI.2

I{ECKIENEURG COUNIY
CHARLCIIE TTP-[C
CHARI.CIIE IhP-22
CHAFLCI IE IIP-39
CHAFTGIIE ThP-52
CHARTCIIE IhP-53
CHAFTCIIE IhP-58
CHARTCIIE IhP-7'
CHARLOI]E ThP-78
CHARLOIIE ThP-79
EERRY} ILL PCI
STECL CREEK PCI-T

IIECKTENBURG CCLNIY
CHARLOIIE I}P-4
CHNRTOIIE IhP-84
CHIRLOIIE TTP-89
CCRAELIUS PCT
CRAB CRCI.!IRD PCI-I,
CRAE GSCFARD PCI-2
DAVIDSCN PCI
HUNIERSVITLE PCI
LEFLY PCI
LCilG CREIK PCI-I
FATLAsO CREEK PCI-I
TALLARO CREEK PCI-2
GAKDELL PCI
PAI CRTEK PCT-I
PAI CREEK PCI-Z



l1

f)

o

e

c

el

a

o

a,

o

G

I.

(..

58

n

,,)

,t

,

a

o

e

o

o

4

o

,

a

o

a

a

o

rRIAL DISIRICT PLAN - HG,,SE (H4OONgOI

tISI OF ENTIIIES 8Y OISIRICT I{TTH POPUT'TIC'\S

DTSTPOP = POPULATION CF THE CISfRICf
REL DEV = RELATM OEVIAIION

ELACK P=PtRCENI SLACKS lN DISIRICT
INOIAN P=PERCEhT tNOIANS IN DISTRICI

POP = P0PULAIICN OF A CCUNTY, fOhNSHIPr ETC.

DISTPOP REL DEV BLACK P TiOIAT{ P

19 30 hEDNES0AY, T{ARCH 7r 1,98{ 20

DI ST

57

,,IEI{B ER S

.l

i

POP

{9r628
5 r163
2 t546

'1 t395'lr86l
I t869
2t344
3r020
2 t226
2 t924
2r906
2r04t
tr658
2 t512
3 r l0 ?

2t793
2t799
3r038
2t826

5A1782
2 t454
2 rG05
3r85?
2t127
3.494
3r7?l
2 t3GE
3 t824
2 t922
2t6C4
2t824
3 tl64
4tZlO
2t91A
5r488
I r50C

49t628 1.2512 4.7 0.4

50.782 3.60 56 L-5 o.3

ENI I TY

tttCxLtt\8URG C0UNIY
CHARLOITE IhP-2
CH!FLOIIE IhP-8
(HARTGTTE IhP.9
CHARLCIIE IhP-I8
CHARLOII E ThP.I9
CHAPLCIIE ThP-20
CHARTCTIE ThFzI,
CHAFLCI IE TTP.32
CHARLOTIE ThP-37
CHARTOII E IhP-38
CHARLOIIE ThP-{?
CHARTCTIE ITP-48
CHARTCIIE IhP.{g
CHARI.OIIE ThP-50
CHARTCfIE IhP-5I
CHARLCITE ThP-59
CHARLCI TE ITP-?I
CHARLOIIE IhP-74

}IECKLENBUBG COUNIY
CHAR!OIIE TTP-36
CHARTGTIE IhP-57
CHARLCI IE IIP-65
CHARTOIIE IhP.67
CHARTCIIE ITP-68
CHARLOI IE ThP-69
CHARTCIIE IhP-70
CHARLCIIE IhP-'2
CHAFTCIIE IIP-73
CHARTCI IE IhP-75
CHARTGI IE IhP-76
CHART6IIE IhP-86
CHARTCIIE TKP-88
PINEVTLLE PCI
PROVIOENCE PCI
STETL CREEK PCI-2

o

/\

o

a

o



c

o

'o

c

TRIAL OISIRICT PLIN. HOUSE IH4OON9OI
T. LIST OF ENIIIIES 8Y OISIRICI HITH POPUIAIIINS

DISIP0P = POPULAIION CF IHE DISTRICf
REL 0EV = R€L!TIvE DEVIAIICN

ELACK P=PERCENI SLACxS It{ 0ISIRICT
INDIAN P=PERCEITT lNDlnNS IN DISIRICT

POP = POPILATICN OF A COUNrYI fOhNSHtP, EfC.

t9 30 t{EDNES0AYT HTFCH 7r t984 2L
o

a

o

a

o

a

G

tIr
,

OI SI

59

tlEl,lEERS

I

OI STPOP

5L t224

49r821

REL OEV

4.5074

1.645 0

BLACK P

4.3

14.2

INCIAi P

0.4

0.5

Et\IIIY

l{ECKtEt\8UFG C0UNIY
CHARIOIIE ThP-7
CHARTgIIE I'P-34
CHARTCIIE IbP-35
CFARLCIIE ITP.62
CHARI.OIIE ThP-63
CHARLOIIE ThP-64
CHARLCIIE TLP-66
CHARLOIIE ThP-83
CHARTCIIE IhP-85
CLEAR CREEK PCI
I{AIIl.EhS PCI
I{INI I.,i ILL PCI-T
I,lINI PILT PCI-2
I,ORI.I ING SIAF PCI

t{tcKtEAEt"RG CCtNrt
CHARTCIIE IhP-I
CHARTOITE IIP-3
CHARTOIIE IhP-5
CHARI.OITE IIP-6
CHARTOIIE IhP-I5
CHARLGIIE ThP-T?
CHARIOIIE IhP-28
CHARLCTIE ITP-29
CHARTOIIE T5P_33
CHARI.GIIE I hP.43
CHARLOIIE ThP-(4
CHARI.OI IE IhP-45
CHARL€I IE I hP-{6
CHASLOTIE IhP-6I

POP

5 1 r224
2t343
3r581
I r588
4 t22Q
3r849

,4t147
ltlt4
q r50e
3 1483
2t6C2
3r6t9
5t393
5 r254
4 t8L3

49 )821
1r738
4 r865
2t139
3r978
{rC80
4r08t
3r885
3r530
3t722
4 t228
2t676
3t511
3 t823
3t5O1

60

o

o

o

o

o

c

c

c

o

,

rt

a

a

o

?
.l,

a

o

a

o

a

a

o

o

o