Correspondence from Williams to Guinier; Summary Sheets of the North Carolina General Election by County, 1980-1982
Working File
February 3, 1987

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Correspondence from Williams to Guinier; Summary Sheets of the North Carolina General Election by County, 1980-1982, 1987. 707e2798-de92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/bf8a627c-1709-44c6-b533-d3f26935b32d/correspondence-from-williams-to-guinier-summary-sheets-of-the-north-carolina-general-election-by-county-1980-1982. Accessed May 22, 2025.
Copied!
/i%§§{;{{ 7¢ano /&onn ~ €12? \ NapoleonB.Williams,Jr. Q7136 fLQ February 3, 1987 To: Lani Guinier Thanks for loaning me copies of these materials from the Gingles files. nbw \‘\~ SURMARY SHEET BASIC RUN I --GENERAL ELECTION . .,/ Type of Eiection ##ZZL«|¢-La r«<’€:,.cfll.,4“ County. Jiglt&{9- Date of Eiection 3L’ra" # of Biack Candidates / ._____,__________ Name. Party and Candidate # of each Biack Candidate - [Age-.910 0’5 1' . Candidate #‘s. and Party‘of Hinning Candidates 1 “ (.0 0 Proportion of Biack ,Proportion of White vote for candidate i vote for candidate i Number of P‘ P' Bci (p.21-22) (p 4) “C1 (p. 21 22) Votes for Candidate # (p. 4) Candidate i, Party regression extreme case regression extreme case # i (p. iBi and Race (0311 estimate estimate estimate estimate “1 roux; i 0 it} 57.5) ,1 9’ .- L.‘ E; . i! f? green? 206 ‘9’0 99 I44 .Uv’ Aasfiao-a - M ,‘7 a .3‘ r3 . PI :7 = “453.26! 40W (77 ,7'7 LN; .97 “5:37;: 5.02) ,7!“ :77 . q 4, . "-0 ”sewage; apt." .7? ‘ '77 . l; J3 .. 7 Chsunz 749' .fi’?- 6! ?$’ 7 ‘ New??? BRW ‘0‘: .(l .34/ ' - CASRPJS’K’J 9 Kw t. , I. / \ '3 6 , ‘ ’ : PLAflWflFPS 1 EXHIarr , 17§c2 _ Gingles ; \‘\ SUflMAR? SHEET BASIC RUN I -eGENERAL ELECTION . ./ Type of Eiection fi544~\.¢-La ,«</{:..cu..4¢9 County. 42¢!Q— Date of Eiection 4-" r2" 2 D # of B‘lack Candidates / Name. Party and Candidate 5 of each Biack Candidate ., I /,¢ «(4.9, 5’ '51 i—o 0 Candidate #‘s and Party of winning Candidates ‘Proportion of White vote for candidate i Proportion of Biack vote for candidate i Number of [NBC ‘ p NC Votes for Candidate # (p. 4) i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 21-22) Candidate i. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case # i (p. isi and Race (0311 estimate estimate estimate estimate “1 rnuaj i 0 2.1,} FM) (7 ‘3’ r L: 1':- . L! f? (:2me me .670 m ,w/ .w A35‘73L20 [ibtl' {'7'? ..¥ {3 i {‘l (‘3‘ A “45326—3" 40W :77 377 ,uo .9? “5:37;: 5.0» f)!" h“? . q 4, . "'0 Markham 61.7" .7? .‘77 . 9J7 ~ 7 CA73'U393 7 '1’ 'o.’ m. 2 '1. M . 15" ‘ 3‘ c”‘3 r2707 8"“! .n .f / .. 3 4/ V . '5' “saws—5*? 9 NW 0 . 2’7 / . 3 6 ‘ ' : PLAINTIFF‘S }‘ mum , 17gc2 _ Gingles 1 Lem County 4KJEcAKQ— Date of E‘Iection ”I" r2" 2 Q # of Biack Candidates / SUMMARY SHEET \'\ BASIC RUN I --GENERAL ELECTION Type of Eiection Name. Party and Candidate # of each Biack Candidate Candidate #‘s and Party of Winning Candidates /,ZA.D_,0‘55L .Z—/¢~\|$-L4 —<(t(. _ 5 -x; / _____,___———— v Proportion of Biack vote for candidate i x—o 0 VProportion of White vote for candidate 1 Number of P'BC _ P WC Votes for Candidate # (p. 4) i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 21-22) Candidate i. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case # i (p. 18) and Race (Dill estimate estimate estimate estimate “14:3qu 1 0 11/ r; J’ ,‘i S’ i L: 5:. i! f? Cay-29:2 20g: .90 9? ,w .4 A35‘73c2a 3 littl' {'7‘? ..¥ :7 I {‘1 , 5‘ A “new: 40W ‘77 77 .uo .97 “55374? 5.021 ,7? n7 . L/ a . so CAac-uuf/ apt" ‘7’? ‘77 . 1,113 - 7 “73:13:73 7 *8 u: . go 2 '1. (‘- f ? s' ‘ .‘ CAaraiqv aNKU .o‘l .C / .3¢/ ' '. CASXVrfi’v'? 9 NW 0 {2 / t '3 e , ' ' I PLAJNTHNVS ' EXHHNT l7§c2 Gingles l \‘\ SUMMARY SHEET BASIC RUN I -.GENERAL ELECTION County Helga ' Type of Election +Zo/"\|¢'LJ «(4' .. c. ,_/J‘ Date of Election .43».- 2 D g of Black Candidates / Name Party and Candidate # of each Biack Candidate ‘ /'Z~D_,fl £915.41” Candidate #‘s' and Party‘of Winning Candidates 1 " (.0 . [7 Proportion of Biack _Proportion of White vote for candidate i vote for candidate i Number of P'BC . plWC ' Votes for Candidate # (p. 4) i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 21-22) Candidate i. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case # i (p. )8) and Race (Dill, estimate estimate estimate estimate ' 3 l ' 5 “1 Hum i 0 it! «VJ CT '7 .- L. t:- . i! .‘t (32:29:? 2296 +90 .99 (LIL! .810 imam. 3 0 t-t/ ;-i a .3‘ e . PI ,5- -\ “4:326: LOW . .‘77 ,7"? .Llo .93 “55374.? sou-J ,7!“ :17 ‘ q 4, . 7-,) c%¢u~:/ simU ,7? ‘17 ' .Vfi ‘3“? “73:13:23. 7 K’ by , ,5. 2 '1. o i . R 5- » '1 ._-t ”8727”? 314w ‘ .o 3 .6 l -. 3 4/ . , ’3‘ “93 wry-7 9 Km; 0 . 2“ / t '3 6 , PLANWHFPS EXHNHT 17§c2 Gingles l SUfiEARY SHEET BASIC RUN I - GENERAL ELECTION .«0 , ’ .V County, /V¢.‘1/ .24:‘./2 e3. Type of Election .ch”.=wrta- ti r’stuezafl Date of Election viii--sz .59f1 # of Black Candidates ~ L/ Name. Party and Candidate # of each Biack Candidate #1 ’//[ n" f 1 'El‘ 1:.- Candidate #‘s and Party of Winning Candidates 4?. ZS ( "/F7 Proportion of Black Proportion of White vote for candidate i vote for candidate 1 Number of P‘BC P'WC Votes for Candidate # (p. 4). i (p.2i-22) (p. 4) i (p. 21-22) Candidate i. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case # i (p. lg), and Race (p.11) estimate estimate estimate estimate “inky/u; 10W .09 .CN .92 .93 ’CAZI/Olfi 2 aw .2; ~20 rf‘tia .53 ’ C‘s/7.07s new .01} .;i .433 .4; “4 a m 40w ./3 .07 ,5‘0 . we ‘CAS {795‘ 551.4 ~33 (.393 .33 .339 -Cl‘eg'3/7é 60H] .20 ,2: 4G? , (it? “7 7 CA8 8 “9‘ 9 PLAJBHTFFS EXIHBFI $31.12— Singles SUfiKARY SHEET BASIC RUN I — GENERAL ELECTION , ’ by l I ‘, . County, ,/V7“3/.£L;2JLI— a.. Type of Election 1/?”.=»7C&- l- e’itaat Date of Eiection ”ifn—SZ 59f1 # of Biack Candidates V .Name, Party and Candidate # of each Biack Candidate A 1’1? [J "I" €- ——7 Candidate #‘s and Party of Winning Candidates .3. 3, 5‘. (t '/_7 Proportion of Black Proportion of White vote for candidate i vote for candidate i Number of P'BC P'RC Votes for Candidate # (p. 4). i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 21-22) Candidate 1. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case # i (p. T§)_ and Race (p.117 estimate estimate estimate estimate “mam 10W .09 .cw .92 ”:23 -‘:"2Hei{1 2 my o-JI .010 '51; .53 * “3/?0‘75 new .2} .31 «LP . .1. :2 CA4 emu: 40w ./3 . 0‘] :5“? . $15 -CA57!:?95'7 56"! ‘32 “93 ~32? .313 ‘CA6/3/7CJ 61.0 LT] '20 r: 2 ‘GP p {:an CA7 7 CA8 8 CA9' 9 PLAHWNFPS EXPHBH' .JQLLLL__ Singles SUNKARY SHEET BASIC RUN I - GENERAL ELECTION /f"‘.-.,-.:—Ce f. _ ///_.31’g’,.0/'~.__. :44,“qu 0-3- County, Type of Election Date of Election # of Black Candidates .Name. Party and Candidate # of each Black Candidate 24/,Za .n f... 'n' '5. .? .1? :5T. Z "/E7 Candidate #‘s and Party of Winning Candidates Proportion of White Proportion of Black vote for candidate i vote for Pcandidate i Number of PBC P'wc Votes for Candidate # (p. 4). i (p.2l-22) (p. 4) i (p. 2l-22) Candidate 1. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case # i (p. 18) and Race (p.11 estimate estimate estimate estimate “main-i 10w .04} .CN .92 .423 'CAZI/Olé 28w .4; ”20 r-V‘Ca .53 ‘CNH7073 303/. .8} .31 '6? .d« “a. 9m: 40w ./3 0‘) :5‘0 . uh CA5 7;»ng an; .23 (.493 .33 .39 ‘9“513179 50w .27) ." 2‘. .6? “11.x CA7 7 CA8 8 CAg‘ 9 PLAHWUFFS EXPHBTT .Lllil__ Singles SUSEARY SHEET BASIC RUN I - GENERAL ELECTION l 10.], I ;.,--"/00 County, ./V7«l/.Jerinle be Type of Election ,K?”iawfte 1- t’a -4 Date of Election # of Black Candidates V .Name. Party and Candidate # of each Black Candidate I / , [TQL441C/ (9 ‘53 5‘ I Candidate #‘s and Party of Winning Candidates .3. 3 5.". (C an Proportion of Black vote for candidate i Proportion of White vote for candidate i Number of P‘BC P'Hc Votes for Candidate # (p. 4)_ i (p.2l—22) (p. 4) i (p. Zl—ZZ) Candidate i. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case # i (p. lg) and Race (p.11 estimate estimate estimate estimate “twin-i 10W .M .7“; .32 .23 ‘CAZIIOIJQ 2 (on; ..2; ”20 .5" .53 - “3/3075- .3021. .071 . 2.1 .473 .4; “44/5“? 40m! .13 .0? 7579 .Ut’i 4®mg 56% .33 .493 .23 .3? ‘c“e./3/7e 60W '27) .2 1 ‘99 '5‘; “7 7 CA8 a CA9" 9 PLAHWNFFS EXPHBH’ .JQLL11__ Singles SUMMARY SHEET BASIC RUN I - GENERAL ELECTION County _j::;jle 'ICE£E47 Type of Election .n<{{~~‘?/: ,/T{.am—4a“:}, .. c /»7 9‘; # of Black Candidates 2 Name, Party and Candidate # of each Black Candidate flrcf/fiaiflff' Date of Election Candidate #‘s and Party of Winning Candidates 2 . ? if"; 'Q Proportion of Black Proportion of White vote for candidate 1 vote for candidate i Number of P‘BC P'Hc Votes for Candidate # (p. 4) i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 2l~22) Candidate 1, Party regression extreme case regression extreme case # i (p. lg) and Race (pal) estimate estimate estimate estimate “7 [3:25 l u/ .3 \ '97 0 ~ -2 CA2 #1:“? 2 0 w . 6 0 \ i 5-! . a"? ”a 0.277 3.9M; .17 ‘ \ .573 ‘44 ”4911/2 40a; .35: \ I .9? .333 Afim‘ 506 '78 \_ .30 .3/ - \ Cat/7:; 55w “2;: .94 war CA7 7 CA8 8 CA9 9 .1 PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT a 1351) Singles County 61/4 I} (1:; Date of Election SUMMARY SHEET BASIC RUN I - GENERAL ELECTION q 4.v’.'>‘ -_,..‘ def/:- 1/ 0.4.” ”M We. (-7 ‘3 i‘e # of Black Candidates Z Type of Election “9/ Name, Party and Candidate # of each Black Candidate /ré,(i?,<‘ Candidate #‘s and Party of Hinning Candidates 2, ?. if]; “4? Proportion of white vote for candidate i Proportion of Black vote for candidate i Number of P‘8c P'Hc Votes for Candidate # (p. 4) i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 21-22) Candidate i, Party regression extreme case regression extreme case 2 i (2. l8) and Race (g.l) estimate estimate estimate estimate CA1 (7"?5' l u/ .5 \ '9? C .14? c"2 sc-r- ' 2kg d/ . 6 D \ » 5‘5’ . :7 “3’277 30M/ .17 ‘ ‘\, ”#3 .44 “an: ton,» .355: \ .9»? .ca (gm: sol-s .7522 L .3 0 .3/ cs‘ilffe afl'a/ .215 \ .‘II/ 29:" (2"7 7 c"a a “9 9 :_ PLAINTIFF’S amen 2 13(1) Gingles SUMMARY SHEET BASIC RUN I - GENERAL ELECTION /_/J County Q/a we; Type of Election ,‘_ ,x new: 11-49), We {.7 '3 £‘~ # of Black Candidates Z Name, Party and Candidate # of each Black Candidate //€'{Zf{4‘£172¥ <7- Date of Election Candidate #‘s and Party of Hinning Candidates .2 . ? 11,5“ Q Proportion of Black Proportion of White vote for candidate 1 vote for candidate i Number of P'BC P'HC Votes for Candidate # (p. 4) i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 2l-22) Candidate 1. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case g i (2. l8) and Race (2.1) estimate estimate estimate estimate CA] (”:2 .3, 1 W 0'3 \ '9? C \ "F? CA2 a"??? g n! . 6 0 \ . 5‘! . a"? CA3 #277 30W {'27 ' \ .93 MH/ ”4921/2 409v .35: \ .9“? 4‘3 Gig/3.1: 5013 my \ .3 o .3/ . \ c5973;- wa/ “In .94 .i-xr “7 7 CA8 8 CA9 9 ; mmnnvs ) EXHIBIT 13(1) Gingles