Correspondence from Williams to Guinier; Summary Sheets of the North Carolina General Election by County, 1980-1982
Working File
February 3, 1987
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Correspondence from Williams to Guinier; Summary Sheets of the North Carolina General Election by County, 1980-1982, 1987. 707e2798-de92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/bf8a627c-1709-44c6-b533-d3f26935b32d/correspondence-from-williams-to-guinier-summary-sheets-of-the-north-carolina-general-election-by-county-1980-1982. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
/i%§§{;{{
7¢ano /&onn ~ €12? \
NapoleonB.Williams,Jr. Q7136 fLQ
February 3, 1987
To: Lani Guinier
Thanks for loaning me copies of
these materials from the Gingles files.
nbw
\‘\~
SURMARY SHEET
BASIC RUN I --GENERAL ELECTION
. .,/
Type of Eiection ##ZZL«|¢-La r«<’€:,.cfll.,4“
County. Jiglt&{9-
Date of Eiection 3L’ra" # of Biack Candidates /
._____,__________
Name. Party and Candidate # of each Biack Candidate
- [Age-.910 0’5 1' .
Candidate #‘s. and Party‘of Hinning Candidates 1 “ (.0 0
Proportion of Biack ,Proportion of White
vote for candidate i vote for candidate i
Number of P‘ P'
Bci (p.21-22) (p 4) “C1 (p. 21 22)
Votes for Candidate # (p. 4)
Candidate i, Party regression extreme case regression extreme case
# i (p. iBi and Race (0311 estimate estimate estimate estimate
“1 roux; i 0 it} 57.5) ,1 9’ .- L.‘ E; . i! f?
green? 206 ‘9’0 99 I44 .Uv’
Aasfiao-a - M ,‘7 a .3‘ r3 . PI :7 =
“453.26! 40W (77 ,7'7 LN; .97
“5:37;: 5.02) ,7!“ :77 . q 4, . "-0
”sewage; apt." .7? ‘ '77 . l; J3 .. 7
Chsunz 749' .fi’?- 6! ?$’ 7 ‘
New??? BRW ‘0‘: .(l .34/ ' -
CASRPJS’K’J 9 Kw t. , I. / \ '3 6 , ‘ ’
: PLAflWflFPS
1 EXHIarr ,
17§c2 _
Gingles ;
\‘\
SUflMAR? SHEET
BASIC RUN I -eGENERAL ELECTION
. ./
Type of Eiection fi544~\.¢-La ,«</{:..cu..4¢9
County. 42¢!Q—
Date of Eiection 4-" r2" 2 D # of B‘lack Candidates /
Name. Party and Candidate 5 of each Biack Candidate .,
I /,¢ «(4.9, 5’ '51
i—o 0
Candidate #‘s and Party of winning Candidates
‘Proportion of White
vote for candidate i
Proportion of Biack
vote for candidate i
Number of [NBC ‘ p NC
Votes for Candidate # (p. 4) i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 21-22)
Candidate i. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case
# i (p. isi and Race (0311 estimate estimate estimate estimate
“1 rnuaj i 0 2.1,} FM) (7 ‘3’ r L: 1':- . L! f?
(:2me me .670 m ,w/ .w
A35‘73L20 [ibtl' {'7'? ..¥ {3 i {‘l (‘3‘ A
“45326—3" 40W :77 377 ,uo .9?
“5:37;: 5.0» f)!" h“? . q 4, . "'0
Markham 61.7" .7? .‘77 . 9J7 ~ 7
CA73'U393 7 '1’ 'o.’ m. 2 '1. M . 15" ‘ 3‘
c”‘3 r2707 8"“! .n .f / .. 3 4/ V . '5'
“saws—5*? 9 NW 0 . 2’7 / . 3 6 ‘ '
: PLAINTIFF‘S
}‘ mum ,
17gc2 _
Gingles 1
Lem
County 4KJEcAKQ—
Date of E‘Iection ”I" r2" 2 Q # of Biack Candidates /
SUMMARY SHEET
\'\
BASIC RUN I --GENERAL ELECTION
Type of Eiection
Name. Party and Candidate # of each Biack Candidate
Candidate #‘s and Party of Winning Candidates
/,ZA.D_,0‘55L
.Z—/¢~\|$-L4 —<(t(.
_ 5
-x; /
_____,___————
v
Proportion of Biack
vote for candidate i
x—o 0
VProportion of White
vote for candidate 1
Number of P'BC _ P WC
Votes for Candidate # (p. 4) i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 21-22)
Candidate i. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case
# i (p. 18) and Race (Dill estimate estimate estimate estimate
“14:3qu 1 0 11/ r; J’ ,‘i S’ i L: 5:. i! f?
Cay-29:2 20g: .90 9? ,w .4
A35‘73c2a 3 littl' {'7‘? ..¥ :7 I {‘1 , 5‘ A
“new: 40W ‘77 77 .uo .97
“55374? 5.021 ,7? n7 . L/ a . so
CAac-uuf/ apt" ‘7’? ‘77 . 1,113 - 7
“73:13:73 7 *8 u: . go 2 '1. (‘- f ? s' ‘ .‘
CAaraiqv aNKU .o‘l .C / .3¢/ ' '.
CASXVrfi’v'? 9 NW 0 {2 / t '3 e , ' '
I PLAJNTHNVS
' EXHHNT
l7§c2
Gingles
l
\‘\
SUMMARY SHEET
BASIC RUN I -.GENERAL ELECTION
County Helga ' Type of Election +Zo/"\|¢'LJ «(4' .. c. ,_/J‘
Date of Election .43».- 2 D g of Black Candidates /
Name Party and Candidate # of each Biack Candidate
‘ /'Z~D_,fl £915.41”
Candidate #‘s' and Party‘of Winning Candidates 1 " (.0 . [7
Proportion of Biack _Proportion of White
vote for candidate i vote for candidate i
Number of P'BC . plWC '
Votes for Candidate # (p. 4) i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 21-22)
Candidate i. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case
# i (p. )8) and Race (Dill, estimate estimate estimate estimate
' 3 l ' 5
“1 Hum i 0 it! «VJ CT '7 .- L. t:- . i! .‘t
(32:29:? 2296 +90 .99 (LIL! .810
imam. 3 0 t-t/ ;-i a .3‘ e . PI ,5- -\
“4:326: LOW . .‘77 ,7"? .Llo .93
“55374.? sou-J ,7!“ :17 ‘ q 4, . 7-,)
c%¢u~:/ simU ,7? ‘17 ' .Vfi ‘3“?
“73:13:23. 7 K’ by , ,5. 2 '1. o i . R 5- » '1 ._-t
”8727”? 314w ‘ .o 3 .6 l -. 3 4/ . , ’3‘
“93 wry-7 9 Km; 0 . 2“ / t '3 6 ,
PLANWHFPS
EXHNHT
17§c2
Gingles
l
SUfiEARY SHEET
BASIC RUN I - GENERAL ELECTION
.«0 ,
’ .V
County, /V¢.‘1/ .24:‘./2 e3. Type of Election .ch”.=wrta- ti r’stuezafl
Date of Election viii--sz .59f1 # of Black Candidates ~ L/
Name. Party and Candidate # of each Biack Candidate
#1 ’//[ n"
f 1 'El‘ 1:.-
Candidate #‘s and Party of Winning Candidates 4?. ZS ( "/F7
Proportion of Black Proportion of White
vote for candidate i vote for candidate 1
Number of P‘BC P'WC
Votes for Candidate # (p. 4). i (p.2i-22) (p. 4) i (p. 21-22)
Candidate i. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case
# i (p. lg), and Race (p.11) estimate estimate estimate estimate
“inky/u; 10W .09 .CN .92 .93
’CAZI/Olfi 2 aw .2; ~20 rf‘tia .53
’ C‘s/7.07s new .01} .;i .433 .4;
“4 a m 40w ./3 .07 ,5‘0 . we
‘CAS {795‘ 551.4 ~33 (.393 .33 .339
-Cl‘eg'3/7é 60H] .20 ,2: 4G? , (it?
“7 7
CA8 8
“9‘ 9
PLAJBHTFFS
EXIHBFI
$31.12—
Singles
SUfiKARY SHEET
BASIC RUN I — GENERAL ELECTION
, ’ by
l I ‘, .
County, ,/V7“3/.£L;2JLI— a.. Type of Election 1/?”.=»7C&- l- e’itaat
Date of Eiection ”ifn—SZ 59f1 # of Biack Candidates
V
.Name, Party and Candidate # of each Biack Candidate
A 1’1? [J "I" €-
——7
Candidate #‘s and Party of Winning Candidates .3. 3, 5‘. (t '/_7
Proportion of Black Proportion of White
vote for candidate i vote for candidate i
Number of P'BC P'RC
Votes for Candidate # (p. 4). i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 21-22)
Candidate 1. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case
# i (p. T§)_ and Race (p.117 estimate estimate estimate estimate
“mam 10W .09 .cw .92 ”:23
-‘:"2Hei{1 2 my o-JI .010 '51; .53
* “3/?0‘75 new .2} .31 «LP . .1. :2
CA4 emu: 40w ./3 . 0‘] :5“? . $15
-CA57!:?95'7 56"! ‘32 “93 ~32? .313
‘CA6/3/7CJ 61.0 LT] '20 r: 2 ‘GP p {:an
CA7 7
CA8 8
CA9' 9
PLAHWNFPS
EXPHBH'
.JQLLLL__
Singles
SUNKARY SHEET
BASIC RUN I - GENERAL ELECTION
/f"‘.-.,-.:—Ce f. _
///_.31’g’,.0/'~.__.
:44,“qu 0-3-
County, Type of Election
Date of Election # of Black Candidates
.Name. Party and Candidate # of each Black Candidate
24/,Za
.n f...
'n' '5.
.? .1? :5T. Z "/E7
Candidate #‘s and Party of Winning Candidates
Proportion of White
Proportion of Black
vote for candidate i
vote for Pcandidate i
Number of PBC P'wc
Votes for Candidate # (p. 4). i (p.2l-22) (p. 4) i (p. 2l-22)
Candidate 1. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case
# i (p. 18) and Race (p.11 estimate estimate estimate estimate
“main-i 10w .04} .CN .92 .423
'CAZI/Olé 28w .4; ”20 r-V‘Ca .53
‘CNH7073 303/. .8} .31 '6? .d«
“a. 9m: 40w ./3 0‘) :5‘0 . uh
CA5 7;»ng an; .23 (.493 .33 .39
‘9“513179 50w .27) ." 2‘. .6? “11.x
CA7 7
CA8 8
CAg‘ 9
PLAHWUFFS
EXPHBTT
.Lllil__
Singles
SUSEARY SHEET
BASIC RUN I - GENERAL ELECTION
l 10.], I ;.,--"/00
County, ./V7«l/.Jerinle be Type of Election ,K?”iawfte 1- t’a -4
Date of Election # of Black Candidates
V
.Name. Party and Candidate # of each Black Candidate
I / ,
[TQL441C/ (9 ‘53 5‘
I
Candidate #‘s and Party of Winning Candidates .3. 3 5.". (C an
Proportion of Black
vote for candidate i
Proportion of White
vote for candidate i
Number of P‘BC P'Hc
Votes for Candidate # (p. 4)_ i (p.2l—22) (p. 4) i (p. Zl—ZZ)
Candidate i. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case
# i (p. lg) and Race (p.11 estimate estimate estimate estimate
“twin-i 10W .M .7“; .32 .23
‘CAZIIOIJQ 2 (on; ..2; ”20 .5" .53
- “3/3075- .3021. .071 . 2.1 .473 .4;
“44/5“? 40m! .13 .0? 7579 .Ut’i
4®mg 56% .33 .493 .23 .3?
‘c“e./3/7e 60W '27) .2 1 ‘99 '5‘;
“7 7
CA8 a
CA9" 9
PLAHWNFFS
EXPHBH’
.JQLL11__
Singles
SUMMARY SHEET
BASIC RUN I - GENERAL ELECTION
County _j::;jle 'ICE£E47 Type of Election .n<{{~~‘?/: ,/T{.am—4a“:},
.. c /»7 9‘; # of Black Candidates 2
Name, Party and Candidate # of each Black Candidate
flrcf/fiaiflff'
Date of Election
Candidate #‘s and Party of Winning Candidates 2 . ? if"; 'Q
Proportion of Black Proportion of White
vote for candidate 1 vote for candidate i
Number of P‘BC P'Hc
Votes for Candidate # (p. 4) i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 2l~22)
Candidate 1, Party regression extreme case regression extreme case
# i (p. lg) and Race (pal) estimate estimate estimate estimate
“7 [3:25 l u/ .3 \ '97 0 ~ -2
CA2 #1:“? 2 0 w . 6 0 \ i 5-! . a"?
”a 0.277 3.9M; .17 ‘ \ .573 ‘44
”4911/2 40a; .35: \ I .9? .333
Afim‘ 506 '78 \_ .30 .3/
- \
Cat/7:; 55w “2;: .94 war
CA7 7
CA8 8
CA9 9
.1 PLAINTIFF'S
EXHIBIT
a 1351)
Singles
County 61/4 I} (1:;
Date of Election
SUMMARY SHEET
BASIC RUN I - GENERAL ELECTION
q
4.v’.'>‘ -_,..‘ def/:- 1/ 0.4.” ”M
We. (-7 ‘3 i‘e # of Black Candidates Z
Type of Election
“9/
Name, Party and Candidate # of each Black Candidate
/ré,(i?,<‘
Candidate #‘s and Party of Hinning Candidates 2, ?. if]; “4?
Proportion of white
vote for candidate i
Proportion of Black
vote for candidate i
Number of P‘8c P'Hc
Votes for Candidate # (p. 4) i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 21-22)
Candidate i, Party regression extreme case regression extreme case
2 i (2. l8) and Race (g.l) estimate estimate estimate estimate
CA1 (7"?5' l u/ .5 \ '9? C .14?
c"2 sc-r- ' 2kg d/ . 6 D \ » 5‘5’ . :7
“3’277 30M/ .17 ‘ ‘\, ”#3 .44
“an: ton,» .355: \ .9»? .ca
(gm: sol-s .7522 L .3 0 .3/
cs‘ilffe afl'a/ .215 \ .‘II/ 29:"
(2"7 7
c"a a
“9 9
:_ PLAINTIFF’S
amen
2 13(1)
Gingles
SUMMARY SHEET
BASIC RUN I - GENERAL ELECTION
/_/J
County Q/a we; Type of Election ,‘_ ,x new: 11-49),
We {.7 '3 £‘~ # of Black Candidates Z
Name, Party and Candidate # of each Black Candidate
//€'{Zf{4‘£172¥ <7-
Date of Election
Candidate #‘s and Party of Hinning Candidates .2 . ? 11,5“ Q
Proportion of Black Proportion of White
vote for candidate 1 vote for candidate i
Number of P'BC P'HC
Votes for Candidate # (p. 4) i (p.21-22) (p. 4) i (p. 2l-22)
Candidate 1. Party regression extreme case regression extreme case
g i (2. l8) and Race (2.1) estimate estimate estimate estimate
CA] (”:2 .3, 1 W 0'3 \ '9? C \ "F?
CA2 a"??? g n! . 6 0 \ . 5‘! . a"?
CA3 #277 30W {'27 ' \ .93 MH/
”4921/2 409v .35: \ .9“? 4‘3
Gig/3.1: 5013 my \ .3 o .3/
. \
c5973;- wa/ “In .94 .i-xr
“7 7
CA8 8
CA9 9
; mmnnvs
) EXHIBIT
13(1)
Gingles