Correspondence from Hunter to Bradford Reynolds; Envelope to Guinier

Correspondence
June 8, 1982

Cite this item

Correspondence from Hunter to Bradford Reynolds; Envelope to Guinier preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorney
- Leslie J. Winner
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- Gingles
Case
- Thornburg v. Gingles
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- eac9dc85-de92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Correspondence from Hunter to Bradford Reynolds; Envelope to Guinier, 1982. eac9dc85-de92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/dd54cb6d-befd-4fb8-abed-ac6550ce2224/correspondence-from-hunter-to-bradford-reynolds-envelope-to-guinier. Accessed August 14, 2025.

Copied!

.i'ail
,l.] ii.ti

r
' \-/

Huxren. Hopcuex. GneExe & GooDMAN RECE'UEU
ATTOFINEYS AT I..A\^'

sutTE 4l o
GATE CIT\'SAVINOS & LOAN BUILDINO

20 I \\.EST MARKET STREET

cREE};SBORO. ^-CtRTH CAROLIN.A 2 7 40?' 3" 16
ROBERT N. HUNTER. JR.
ROIJT]RT SA\T'\'ETI HODG!.TAN
RIC}I.{RD M. (lREENE
G-A.R\'lj. COODMA\'

J. Bradforo Reynolds
Assistant Attorney GeneraL
Department of Justice
Civi I iri gi-rts Dirri sion
Iiashington, D. C.

P. O. BOX 0245
(9 r 9) 373-O9C.1
(9 t 9) 276- 134 r

JUN-gH
ffit 3!G.E-ftrrErn rfrrrn*

June B, 1982

DF" Pugh vs. Hunt, l!o. 81 E. 1066 Civ. 5
Eastern District, N.C

Dear i/rr. Rei;nolcs :

I represent the plaintiffs in a Voting Rights Act suit which
nas been brought aoainst the State of North Carolina for intentional-
racia1 discrimination in apportioning certain multimember districts
in the State of iiorth Carol-ina. The Department of Justi-ce earlier
this year interpcsed objections to reapportionment plans in the
State of il-orth Carolina in 40 "Section 5" counties where concentration
of ininoritlz memDers hat,e been submeroed into larger multimember
oistricts. Iicwever, in the remaining sixti, counties of i'iorth Carol-j-na
not covereo b]'section 5 of the Voting Riqhts Act, the irlorth Carolinaj.egislature reoistricted the state in such a v/ay that concentration
of r.rinority voters in four areas have been submerged into large
mul-timember districts. These areas are Forsyth, Wake, I,iecklenburg
anc Durham counties.

Our suit nas been brought by four Republican plaintiffs who are
ver)'concerneo about the adverse effects of this redistricting on both
poli-tical and raciaL minorities. We have previouslr, provided a 1ot of
information and data regaroing this matter to the staff of the Voting
P.ights Section in preparinE responses to the State of i'iorth Carolina's
l-'ians.

I am requesting that the Department of Justice intervene in the
suit as an amicus curia to be of assistance in proving our case of
intentional voter afscrimination. I fear without such assi-stance and
material- help in terms of legal time, expert witnesses ano financial
abilitlt to conouct depositions that we will be unable to ful1y and
aoequately litj-gate this matter. Our request is of an urgent nature.
The voting rights of many minority raciaL and political- elements of
r.lorth Carolina will be adversely effected should our cause not be
sustained in the court. For the next ten (10) )rears large segments
of iriorth Carolina's voting population will- be ef fectively unable to
exercise their franchise. Although T have not asked them to wrj-te

J. Bradford Reynolds
Page Two
June 8, 1982

such a letter, I am sure the NAACP counsel in this matter would
join in this request. I trust you will give this matter your prompt
attention ano I urge you to authorize your staff to intervene as amicus
curia in tire above-captioned lawsuit so that we might have the beneEft
Eno'-Essistance of the United States Department of Justice in litigating
this very important matter

With kindest personal regards, f drirr

RNHJT,/ms

ly,

CHAMBERS, FERGUSON. WATT, WALLAS, ADKINS & FULLER. PA

SUITE 73O EAST INOEPENDENCE PUZA

951 SUTH INDEPENOENCE rcULEVARD

CHARLOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA 2A2O2 . --\i l
I

lL !lr
lii
UEi-L: \rL-j "
CXzttt.|A', '"

--l

Ms. Lani Guinier
Legal Defense Fund
Suite 2030
10 Coltrmbus Circle
New York, New York 10019

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Correspondence from Hunter to Bradford Reynolds; Envelope to Guinier

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorney

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in