Ltr. to Hon. Alexander Stevas from Elaine Jones
Correspondence
February 15, 1984
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Hardbacks, Briefs, and Trial Transcript. Ltr. to Hon. Alexander Stevas from Elaine Jones, 1984. a0076910-d592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e5994faa-71e9-4415-98fc-ea28e5eaa43f/ltr-to-hon-alexander-stevas-from-elaine-jones. Accessed December 06, 2025.
Copied!
I/1"^o /*^ a
Opal Tolbert
February l5, 1984
T0: Lani Guinier
It is a good thing that I
called Central. They couldn't
even find my order, but I talked
to the manager and he got someone
right over here and promised to
have it at the Court by 4z30 p.m.
Itp
I
February 15, I984
Dear Mr. Stevas:
Rarph Gingres, et a1., Respondents oppose petitioners,
Application to Stay the Mandate of the United States District'Court for the Eastern Distriet of North Carolina. As counsel.for Respondents, we request that the court not grant peti-
tionersr application prior to receiving Respondents' response.
Respondents received Petitioners' application today. As Mondayis a lega1 holiday, Respondents propose to file a response on
Tuesday, February 21, L9g4 or at such earlier date as is speci-fied by the Court.
we woul-d appreciate your bringing this matter to theattention of t.he chief Justice, before whom this matteris pendinq.
The Honorable
Clerk
United States
I,lashington, D.
Re:
LG:jj
Alexander Stevas
Supreme Court
c. ?0543
Rufus Edmisten, et al.
Eqlph GingIes, et aI. (
(Petitioners ) v.
Respondents )
Sincerely,
fl-*-. Gd^^-"- /roq.Jack Greenber g t
Leslie Winner
Lani Guinier
Cn,1 \
L-X,ua,',- \.X . \_-ilD--\\e----
Counsel for Respondents
8OO ISTH STREET, N.W., sulTE 940 (202)038-3278 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006