Excerpt from Senate Judiciary Debate RE: Vote Dilution
Annotated Secondary Research
June 9, 1982

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Guinier. Excerpt from Senate Judiciary Debate RE: Vote Dilution, 1982. 2421ec90-dc92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/e8199d1a-aebf-4ed4-995f-f014663ffb2b/excerpt-from-senate-judiciary-debate-re-vote-dilution. Accessed April 28, 2025.
Copied!
t.(G,/ _ _*4-<1. I I t I t , : ty dtuuo uf fofin8 derlvE tc Ua @c,Dctto& one cdr ol R.tt&v. of .t&c #uy* i, t *Donsc.ltc rcPt of vott dfi$ rirtlculated to Reuuolds' 3?? t .8- (1904), [s rn .ntlrcly different con'-tlin tUe o tnet bas evolved r provldooe o[ theYoting Rtgbts The Reynoli conceptlon ol "vota was ona thrS was "ealllY de' iritii 8nd rnqlrrer one 33O.mO iitele rrri,s.- dlutlo" ln thc' euc'-Dq. - 3f,9' U.g . lilD rndiDdara tc-mo far norc' ffiE A-i..r.l goupe Posseslr &fra*hlii': E- tffi-tbetu- fuf iiior represtrttm.'cceD ll trtrey lclong t4 drilr-tSr ol -equsl^ _popufe. 'Ifie Revnolc ead Fbrtson no' .o[ "voe AIdm' ha1,9-191!S aou but ths tr;'. No wltl,€si the Sendc JudclerY Conmlt' rasaUtoto rloe rnYttttog aPPmrt irg-s ooncrc* Endrrstsndlqr d Iea:*unamtof -wtG logx! llte h of rerir gouFi:: =-r :- " -i: : cqqegpt ot rced ttr Fort.'