Motion for Extension of TIme and Proposed Order

    ao ?r

RUFUS L. EDM]STEN
ATTORNEY GENERAL

$tate uf $urt{ Ourslina
pepurlment of Slugtirr

P. O. BOX 629
RALEIGH

27602-0629

January L2, 1983

Honorable J. Rich Leonard, Clerk
United States District Court
Eastern District of North Carolina
Federal Building
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761L

Re: G5-ngles, €t dl., v. Edmisten, €t a'I., No.81-803-CIV-5
Pugh, €t d1., v. Hunt, et a1, 8I-1066-CIV-5
Cavanagh, et a.I., v. Brock, 82-545-CIV-5

Dear Mr. Leonard:

Enclosed please find for filing, the original and
three copies of Defendantsr MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
and Proposed ORDER.

to me.
Please mark one copy "fiIed" and return the same

Thank you for your usual cooperation.

Very truly yours,

RUFUS L. EDMISTEN

JWJR/p1

Enclosures

S

ty
Wallace, J
Attorney/GeneraI

Legal Affairs



oo

No. rrtr{J*Bo
t:,t:.\.; .i - Ir,,,

': 
/ll.-ii 

LLr-1 .,n^.." 
- '

" ""oo,{}:*#i^{,t,il',

No. 81-1066-CIv-5

JAMES B. HUNT, JR., €t d1.,

Defendants.

-and-

JOHN J. CAVANAGH, €t d1.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ALEX K. BROCK, €t a1.,

Defendants.

No. 82-545-CIV-5

Now col,tE the Defendants, by and through their counsel
of record, and respectfully pray the court that they be granted
an extension of time to and through wednesday, January 19, r9g3,
in which to respond to the cavanagh plaintiffs, Motion for
summary Judgment and to file an accompanying cross-motion for
sunmary judgrment. rn support whereof , Defendants show to the

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRTCT COURT
FoR rHE uot'ull"B13fl.l:$rSloilo*tH CARoLTNA

RALPH GINGLES, €t aI.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

RUFUS EDMISTEN, €t aI.,
Defendants.

-and-

AIAN V. PUGH, €t d1.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.



-2- oo
court that an extension is needed for the following reasonss

(1) That the Cavanagh plaintiffs' Motion for Summary

Judgment and supporting memorandum took more than the assumed

three days to reach all parties entitred to service thereof;
(21 That the period during which Defendants have had

the opportunity to work on their response and cross-motion

has included the Christmas and New yearrs holidays;
(3) That the need for coordination and mailing documents

between Washington counsel and the Office of the Attorney

General of North Carolina has consrunmed additional time; and

(4) That certain technical difficulties have arisen.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs in Cavanagh consent to the

extension requested herein.

WHEREFORE, the Defendants request the court to grant

an extension of time through and to Wednesday, January 19, 1983,

for the Defendants to file a Response to Motion for Summary

Judgment, a cross-motion for sunmary judgrment, and a support-

ing memorandum.

Respectfully submitted, this 12th day of January, 1983.

RUF'US L. EDMISTEN

Attorney Generalrs Office
N. C. Department of Justice
Post Office Box 629
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Telephone: (919) 733-3377
Attorney for Defendants

ATTORNEY GEN

Jagel Wal1ace, dr.
y Attorney

or Legal Aff*fus



oo

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day served the fore-

going Motion for Extensj-on of Time

by placing a copy of same in the United States Post Office,

postage prepaid, addressed to:

Mr. J. Levonne Chambers
Ms. Leslie Winner
Chambers, Ferguson, Watt, Wa1las,

Adkins & r.ulIer, P.A.
951 South IndePendence Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202

Mr. Jack Greenberg
Mr. James M. Nabritt III
Ms. Lani Guinier
I0 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019

Mr. Arthur J. Donaldson
Burke, Donaldson, Holshouser & Kenerly
309 North Main Street
SalisburY, North Carolina 28144

Mr. Robert N. Hunter, Jr.
AttorneY at Law
Post Office Box 3245
Greensbol'or North Carolina 27402

Mr. Hamilton C. Horton, Jr.
Whiting, Horton & Hendrick
450 NCNB Plaza
Irlinston-Sa1em, North Carolina 27101

Mr. WaYne T. Elliot
Southeastern Legal Foundation
18OO CenturY Boulevard, Suite 950
Atlanta, Georgia 30345

This the 12tt', day of Janrrary , 1983'

I

-t-rl
i
I



v oo
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THB EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
RALEIGH DIVISION

RALPH GINGLES, et dI.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

EDMISTEN, et a1.

Defendants.

-and-

RUFUS

ALAN V. PUGH, €t a1.,

Plaintiffs,
vs.

JAMES B. HUNT, JR., et d1.,

Defendants.

-and-

JOHN J. CAVANAGH, €t a1.,

Plaintiffs,

vs-

ALEX K. BROCK, €t tsI.,

Defendants.

No. 81-1066-CIV-5

No. 82-545-CIV-5

ORDER

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, it is hereby ORDERED that the

Defendants in the above-entitled actions are hereby granted

an extension of time to and through January 19, 1983, in
which to respond to the Cavanagh Plaintiffs' Motion for
Summary Judgment and to file a cross-motion for sunmary



,' oo
-2-

ay of January, 1983,

d,nffi
U. S. Eastern District of North

CaroIi-na

judgment.

This the E^



RALPH GINGLES, et al., )
)Plaintiffs,

vs.

RUFUS EDMISTEN, €t al.,

)
)
)

)
ALAN V. PUGH, €t d1., )

oo

No. 81-803-CIV-5

No. 81-1066-CIV-5

IN THE UNITED STATES DTSTRICT COURT
FoR rHE EASTERN"BI:l.i:$r3loilo*rH CARoLTNA

Defendants.

-and-

Plaintiffs,

vs.

)
)
)
)

)
JAMES B. HUNT, JR., et d1., )

)
Defendants.

-and-

JOHN J. CAVANAGII, et a1.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ALEX K. BROCK, €t a1.,

Defendants -

No.82-545-CIV-5

ORDER

FoR GooD cAUsE sHowN, it is hereby oRDERED that the
Defendants in the above-entitled actions are hereby granted

an extension of time to and through January 19, 1993, in
which to respond to the cavanagh plaintiffsr Motion for
summary Judgrment and to file a cross-motion for sunmary



oo
-2-

judgrment

This the _ day of January, 1983.

F. T. Dupree, Jr.
United States District Judge



I EII--

State of Nort! Carolirra
Beparlmenl nf luoticc

D O BOX 629

BALE|cH 27602-0629

o
oMR. Jack Greenberg

Attorney at Law
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York 10019